Esato

Forum > Manufacturer Discussion > Samsung > Samsung i8510 INNOV8 *official now*

Previous  123 ... 1516 171819  Next
Author Samsung i8510 INNOV8 *official now*
MWEB
Xperia X10 Black
Joined: Feb 13, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: somewhere nicer than you
PM
Posted: 2008-09-24 16:11
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
QVGA is really ancient tech IMO, VGA or better is fast becoming the norm with high end devices.
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-09-24 16:47
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-09-24 15:48:00, Trev1982 wrote:


When you nothing good to say, silence is better
Bonovox
LG G4
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-02 23:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Just read review of this in What Mobile mag and the picture quality looks amazing. But the only thing they said was poor about the phone was its signal strength. Does anyone notice that with this phone and would it be fixed in an update. I would love this phone.
chtan69
Model not set
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
Posts: 16
PM
Posted: 2008-10-15 10:24
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
My signal strength is fine. Here are some photo shots i taken with my Innov8.
Dawn, low light condition....
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/chtan69/Innov8/Photo063.jpg
Another dawn shot....
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/chtan69/Innov8/Photo056.jpg
Ferry
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/chtan69/Innov8/Photo057.jpg
Close-up, flower
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/chtan69/Innov8/Photo020.jpg
Time Square
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y161/chtan69/Innov8/Photo017.jpg
davicol
Model not set
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 37
PM
Posted: 2008-10-17 08:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'm posting pics in the photos section,if you like,go there and have a look.
Let me know your opinion about. have a good day all!
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-17 10:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^^ Amazing photos! Slightly better than C905
jj03
T68 gold
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-17 13:20
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-09-23 14:16:07, EMS06 wrote:
@mario/janbobejan

Oh, please! Just because you own a Nokia N95 you think it was the best camera phone before the INNOV8. The K850i was/is better than the N95 period.

The best camphone before the Samsung was the Nokia N82. Also, looking at the new pictures of the C905 vs the INNOV8 the latter doesn't look so hot anymore, the C905 does look somewhat more realistic in colour rendering though in terms sharpness it is rather unclear which one is the winner IMO.



The k850i remark, was of course, just your opinion, and in no way a fact. Of course, your remark would be supported on a se forum, but really...for a long period, the k850i sucked ass, photo wise.

I myself prefer the innov8 to the c905. The pictures are fantastic. Also, lets not forget that further updates to the innov8 can and will probably improve the camera's ability's.

I look forward to nokia's release of their 8mp (possibly touchscreen) n-series handset.
davicol
Model not set
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 37
PM
Posted: 2008-10-20 08:49
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Posting new pics in ther photos section
chtan69
Model not set
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
Posts: 16
PM
Posted: 2008-10-20 10:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-20 08:49:25, davicol wrote:
Posting new pics in ther photos section


Hello, davicol. I'd accidentally inserted one of my photo into your Innov8 section. Is there anyway to remove it from there? Or can i continuously adding in others?
Really sorry for that.

[ This Message was edited by: chtan69 on 2008-10-20 09:18 ]
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-20 15:58
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-20 08:49:25, davicol wrote:
Posting new pics in ther photos section

Comparing your photos from the INNOV8 with Marcus Radecker's C905 photos I would say that it's clear that Sony Ericsson has plenty of room for improvement.

For example, look at the grass and tree leaves in this INNOV8 shot and compare with this C905 shot. The C905 is using too much NR, maybe because of noisier sensor or not so great lens. The C905 may have a Xenon flash but what good will that do if the photos look like sh*t anyway?


On 2008-10-20 10:17:56, chtan69 wrote:

On 2008-10-20 08:49:25, davicol wrote:
Posting new pics in ther photos section


Hello, davicol. I'd accidentally inserted one of my photo into your Innov8 section. Is there anyway to remove it from there? Or can i continuously adding in others?
Really sorry for that.

[ This Message was edited by: chtan69 on 2008-10-20 09:18 ]

Don't worry. The Photos gallery is for everyone to post in. I'm sure davicol would be more than happy to share that space with you and all other INNOV8 owners that may want to post their snaps.

_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.

[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-10-20 15:08 ]
se_dude
Xperia Arc Silver
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-20 16:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@abubasim-you chose thw worst pic in the marcusdecker arena.Show me a low light clicked by the Innov8 as good as that by the c905.The pics by hr C905 R1AA085 were really good.

Check a few samples from the smapre view or the mobiel review one, they are quite good.
AbuBasim
Nokia N8
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2008-10-20 16:21
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
se_dude, What are you doing in this thread? Looking for someone saying bad stuff about SE phones?

Good low light from the C905? Assuming of course that it's something reasonably close! Compare this INNOV8 shot with this C905 shot. Both were shot in Auto mode according to the EXIF data but the result is very different. The C905 seems to have a problem with exposure in scenes that are too far for the Xenon flash. Notice how the car in the lower left corner in the C905 shot was hit by the flash but the rest of the scene is almost pitch dark.

The C905 sample I chose was the first one that looked somewhat similar to davicol's shot, with both trees and grass. Here's another one. Still a bit fuzzy in detail.

You mentioned SM@PE. Here's an INNOV8 and a C905 sample to compare with. Still the same problem.

I know that some people feel that color and saturation is more important than fine detail at full resolution. For me it's the other way around. Color and saturation can always be fixed afterwards before printing. Loss of detail on the other hand can never be recovered -- unless you're prepared to spend a long time on each photo painting back leaves and grass in Photoshop. Good detail is important if you print blow-ups or even more so when you have a (camera) phone with such as high resolution as 8 MP and you want to crop your photos to just view or print smaller parts of them.

_________________
Souvenirs, novelties, party tricks.


[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-10-20 15:37 ]
davicol
Model not set
Joined: Jun 24, 2008
Posts: 37
PM
Posted: 2008-10-21 08:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Sure everyone can post pics, it's not my innov8 section! and i'm very glad to see other's pictures!
chtan69
Model not set
Joined: Oct 15, 2008
Posts: 16
PM
Posted: 2008-10-21 09:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2008-10-21 08:26:20, davicol wrote:
Sure everyone can post pics, it's not my innov8 section! and i'm very glad to see other's pictures!


Thanks.
JiSm
X1 Silver
Joined: Nov 08, 2007
Posts: 404
From: New Zealand
PM, WWW
Posted: 2008-10-21 10:56
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Has anyone compared pics using C905 smart Contrast? In low light this made the pictures absolutely amazing.
"Back in the land of the long white cloud!"
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 1516 171819  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic