| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
he asked about night pics.. so whats the problem ???? (who cares if i show him some pictures who have been posted ONE time before).
are you some kind of Esato-mod or what...(you just like Raderski are just the same. never some positive or relavant information to share... just same all crap like allways)
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 14:17 ] |
|
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Lol, these resized images actually makes this camera better than on my T100 Digital camera
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
same all bullshit every time.. dont you have some imagination ????
f#ck man, get a girlfriend (or maybe a boyfriend suits you better) just do something who makes you happy !
is it so damn boring there you live or what ??? just nagging, complaining, it must eat you up from the inside man.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 14:15 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 14:28 ] |
rigved11
Joined: Jul 28, 2008
Posts: 4
From: India
PM |
@plankgatan
very nice pics...
can u tell me what settings you use for night photos??
i get very bad quality photos during night with my c902(R3BH002)... |
Fanofmodi
Joined: Jan 03, 2008
Posts: 191
From: Hindustan
PM |
Hell is empty,
All the devils are here.
K750>W800>W810>W850>J100>P900>K790>M600>K800>W880>K810>W580>K850>W890>C902. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
you just like Raderski are just the same. never some positive or relavant information to share...
get lost freak! you still don't uderstand what is the reason of all non-positive for your person posts? it's because of you - your lies, bulshits, resized pics and your pics everywhere. I'm not buying your bulshits you freak
... and look what you did. until now we had status quo after our yesterday "discussion" but you started again. one more time I had to make off-topic because of you. you just cannot live without flamewars
|
843
Joined: Jul 24, 2008
Posts: 42
PM |
Here's a full-size crop posted by mlkj. It's really hard finding low-light pics in the gallery. In fact, this was the only low light I could find where the only light source is the flash itself. I have yet to find one without flash.
http://www.esato.com/phonephotos/viewphotos.php?pid=13093
In my opinion:
-some noise despite shooting with relatively low ISO
-oil painting effect visible
-weak focus at macro distance
C902 performs well with sufficient light, but has nothing to brag about in low light conditions.
*wears flameproof armor* |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
843
*wears flameproof armor*
be sure! right now you need it more than water or even air! 
|
Pitzon
Joined: Oct 14, 2007
Posts: 435
From: Sweden
PM |
I have written many times and in several forums that i see c902 as a "day-time/good light" cam mainly. Indoors and in darker light i have a hard time to get any sharp pictures.
But outside in good light/strong sunshine the c902 rocks. I have never had a phone that takes better autopics. They are "nice" and almost always sharp. And the most impressive is the % of good pics that comes out of it. (in good light) You can really trust the cam and itīs almost impossible to fool the focus system.
I have on the other hand just placed an order for a black N82 (again) because itīs better indoors and in darker situations with the xenon flash who i miss a bit. |
elementz
Joined: Aug 27, 2004
Posts: 56
PM |
On 2008-08-18 17:25:57, plankgatan wrote:
dont get your point here, this 2 house pictures looks awesome for a cell phone, (and now i mean noise, details, etc).
they looks better then any i-mobile902 daylight picture ive seen.
Just for fun (sorry off topic) - i found some pics taken using my i-mobile 902 which has similar lighting, framing and subject as these two pics:
even indoor looks ok
Did a full size crop...
1) Indoor - hair
c902:
imobile902:
2) outdoor - flower
c902:
imobile 902:
3) outdoor - flat
the same portion of an apartment, under cloudy condition. But of course taken at different time (abt 1 year difference).
form your own opinion about the quality of daylight pics (noise, details) between these 2 phones.
basically when u down-size the pics, both phones' pics look very sharp. And yes, c902 shows better colors.
[ This Message was edited by: elementz on 2008-08-20 16:23 ] |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
taken in the evening with auto.... c902 handle less light with best colors i ever seen on a cell phone.
_________________
I C902, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-20 20:06 ] |
barr5790
Joined: Jul 27, 2008
Posts: 12
PM |
On 2008-08-20 15:53:23, Raiderski wrote:
you just like Raderski are just the same. never some positive or relavant information to share...
not buying your bulshits you freak
Bit harsh no? After all its only a phone... |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-20 17:17:36, elementz wrote:
form your own opinion about the quality of daylight pics (noise, details) between these 2 phones.
basically when u down-size the pics, both phones' pics look very sharp. And yes, c902 shows better colors.
Color accuracy is one area where even a CMOS sensor can be good.
Unfortunately, 5 MP is really wasted when most photos don't have enough detail to warrant so many pixels, hence the need for some to shrink their photos. And this is not the fault of the sensor but the lens. Take any photo from a C902, K850 or i-mobile 902 and shrink it to 3 MP and upsize it again to 5 MP and you will see no difference. I showed a couple of examples (K850i and N95 8GB) of this in the first two pages of the G900/G700 photos thread.
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
sorry that you have to read this but I'm harsh only if I have to be. I'm not the only one who is harsh here, you know what I mean... posts... not my...
back to status quo
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-21 08:09 ] |
PzK
Joined: Jan 31, 2007
Posts: 35
PM, WWW
|
Very low light shot with c902
 |
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-20 14:51
