| Author |
good pic-quality by W760i |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
im really really surprised by w760 pic-quality. this is maybe my next phone. a  phone with such a good camera is allways nice.
VERY good for a camera with NO AutoFocus  ...looks even better then my old K750 cid36 camera !
_________________
I  K850, W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2009-06-10 09:46 ] | |
|
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Stunning??? NO!!!
Decent??? Maybe... This is not the original resolution but I can still, clearly see the over-smoothness effect... |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
are you blind ???
for a non AF camera this quality is very very good.
(they looks nearlly better then a k800 who is Cybershoot branded, (with optimized cam driver + AF))
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 18:13 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
G702 easily beats this
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
G702 ????? which phone is that... he he
maybe you mean c702 (or g700).... i really dont think so, not by the pics ive seen.
w760 have surprising good sharpness for a phone whitout autofocus
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 18:17 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Plankgaton, your judgment of picture quality sucks.
|
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
Those Pictures were taken with a No-Auto focus Camera 
I have to agree with Plank, w760 Picture Quality is stunning!!!
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
the colour & exposure look nice, can't really tell what the quality is like from resized pics the over smooth pics is a result of compression & no AF. |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2008-05-23 19:15:28, plankgatan wrote:
G702 ????? which phone is that... he he
maybe you mean c702 (or g700).... i really dont think so, not by the pics ive seen.
w760 have surprising good sharpness for a phone whitout autofocus
Mizzle means g702, yes!
Look at this m8: http://www.mobil.se/ArticlePa[....]135518_MOB820/retrieve.cgi.pdf
|
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-05-23 19:24:00, QVGA wrote:
Plankgaton, your judgment of picture quality sucks.
You got your answer Plank... Sorry to say, I really like pics posted by you but as said by QVGA, your judgment of picture quality for SE PHONES just sucks NOW...
It's not me blind, but it seems you're blind in favor of SE... I know you do this in any topic where picture quality of any SE phone is brought up (especially K850), so I ain't gonna convince you...
You should be the first one here who should be knowing that autofocus helps in taking pictures at closer distances and not for long distances...  |
mariozlp
Joined: May 29, 2007
Posts: 368
From: Greece\Athens
PM |
On 2008-05-23 19:15:28, plankgatan wrote:
G702 ????? which phone is that... he he ( it's beibei)
maybe you mean c702 (or g700).... i really dont think so, not by the pics ive seen. (they should have such quality pic as this w760)
w760 have surprising good sharpness for a phone whithout autofocus (yeah i'm impressed but i dont like much its design, prefer w910, have to see it live)
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 18:17 ]
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
@hgautam do you really think i care about QVGA answers ???? a man who never show his own pics, just complaing on everyone else !!!
second, yes, you must blind... autofocus improves not ONLY macro shoots, it improves all pics because it have a different optic, of course it improves "more" on shorter distance, but if you look at the pics its several pics taken in quite short distance... so what do you know about photographing ????
i think they looks really good for a non cybershoot branded phone with no AF, no special optimized camera software (like example K-serie), and so on.
this pics have good colors, good sharpness............
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:34 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:35 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-23 20:24:36, plankgatan wrote:
@hgautam do you really think i care about QVGA answers ???? a man who never show his own pics, just complaing on everyone else !!!
second, yes, you must blind... autofocus improves not ONLY macro shoots, it improves all pics because it have a different optic, of course it improves "stronger" on shorter distance, but if you look at the pics its several pics taken in quite short distance... so what do you know about photographing ????
i think they looks really good for a non cybershoot branded phone with no AF, no special optimized camera software (like example K-serie), and so on.
this pics have good colors, good sharpness............
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:29 ]
You judgement in picture quality is very poor. You can talk about colors, optics, blah blah but it wont change that fact
Oh, and you know nothing about photography too.
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
plankgatan,
No, I do mean G702. It's yet unannounced, and its camera is also 3 mega pixels and fixed focus, yet it performs much better than anything I have ever seen before in that range, and probably also above.
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
qvga, you must be the most boring person on this forum. you dosent know anything about photographing... have you ever post one single pics from you own phone ????
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:40 ]
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-23 19:42 ] | |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-05-23 18:56
