| Author |
K850 VS N82: What's better? |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-05-11 10:48:19, plankgatan wrote:
no, i said that Symbian (overall) is slower and more unlogic then Java.
A cryptic statement from plankis. "Unlogic"? What do you mean exactly?
At least there is the choice. Symbian phones do also support Java but I would expect compiled C++ code to be faster than interpreted Java bytecode. Actually that isn't much of merit. If Microsoft ported VisualBasic to embedded devices, even that would be faster than Java. | |
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
who gives a shit anyway..... 
K850 looks much more beatiful then N82, (allways have, allways will).
@abu. what i mean is; when i search for someting in my K850, i find it easy and fast, that was NOT the feeling i had with my N82... ok
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-11 17:35 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-05-11 18:32:07, plankgatan wrote:
who gives a shit anyway.....
K850 looks much more beatiful then N82, (allways have, allways will).
_________________
I K850, W810 & T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-05-11 17:35 ]
I think N82 looks better. There i said it. Does that make it a fact? No! And neither does your statement.
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
I think this has gone as far as it can
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-05-11 14:01
