| Author |
K850i vs CANON IXUS 75 |
sblant
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 34
PM, WWW
|
Here a comparison between a SonyEricsson K850i 5MP vs a CANON IXUS 75 7MP.
K850i
http://www.imagecross.com/ima[....]ing-viewer-04.php?id=61232.JPG
CANON IXUS 75
http://www.imagecross.com/image-hosting-viewer-04.php?id=8802.JPG
[ This Message was edited by: sblant on 2008-04-26 12:10 ] |
|
|
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Links to do not work!
|
sblant
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 34
PM, WWW
|
thanks, now it should work.... |
Killfr3nzy
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Arabia and Hollanda
PM |
Good pictures, im not seeing alot of difference, only this one (too much light?):
 |
sblant
Joined: Mar 10, 2008
Posts: 34
PM, WWW
|
Canon makes better shots but is a real camera...
K850 is really impressive... |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
@Killfr3nzy,
Looks like the two shots were taken at slightly different angles. That light meter is catching a reflection from a light source above the scene so I don't think it's overexposed.
Easier to see (BIG) differences at 100 percent scale:
From the above, I would never think of making A4 prints of the K850 shot.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-26 13:05 ] |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
AbuBasim
I really think that A4 prints wouldn't suit any pictures taken by cameraphones. |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
No camera phone produces photos printable on A4? Have a look at these these.
_________________
Snuck! It's ointment time! -- Mad Jack the Pirate
[ This Message was edited by: AbuBasim on 2008-04-26 20:57 ] |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
Guess I was wrong then, mate. 
Nice pictures you took there.
[ This Message was edited by: G-Izzat on 2008-04-26 20:59 ] |
Killfr3nzy
Joined: Mar 08, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Arabia and Hollanda
PM |
@AbuBasim;
Yes, you're right i guess, didn't see it. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
wooaaah. very VERY good pic (from k850).
k850 (800 x 600)
canon (800 x 600)
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-04-26 21:37 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
^^ The colors may be similar but it's the noise that will separate the Canon and the K850 by a very wide margin. and there's no point in bragging that K850 can produce image as good as canon if we only refer to shrunked pics.
if it is imobile 902 that we compared with canon then maybe i'll change my first paragraph 
~19 years at Esato |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
As long as you print only postcard-sized photos then most camera phones, even those with CMOS sensors, will do just fine. So for this purpose, scaling down the photos is OK as 800x600 will still look good at 4x6". On the other hand, you will never be able to produce good looking blow-ups of the shots that you are really proud of.
|
dentoters07
Joined: Jan 15, 2008
Posts: 285
From:
PM |
a "camera phone" is verry different from a "stand-alone camera" and of course, th stand-alone camera always, always, will win over the camera phone.. there is no point of comparing those two.. k850 is out of it's league being compared to a stand-alone camera.. it's just like comparing a cat from a lion.. |
boom13
Joined: Apr 18, 2008
Posts: 25
From: Somersworth, NH
PM, WWW
|
Please let people have the rights to post stuff they want. Dont tell them theyre wrong. Leave them alone. Seriously people here have been flaming to peoples thread saying that the thread is a total mistake. Especially the guy "Prom1" |
|
|
Posted: 2008-04-26 12:47
