| Author |
Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot discussion |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
It's better to have more fps, just use 30fps qvga for forget vga it's useless on a qvga screen anway, plus file sizes will be smaller, i'm using 178*144 .3gp and there still perfectly watchable fullscreen.
|
|
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-11-10 16:12:37, number1 wrote:
My Low-light pics are still better than my k800's
...
digressions about the superiority of something over something are always a neverending story but there are limits of credibility. sorry but you are beyond the limit. please, don't post another boring comparision - people don't want to eat more than they can swallow. however if you want to prove something you can try to do this in my thread (about my camdriver for K800) where we can create further discussion. don't expect my pics from K800 in this thread about C702
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-11-11 22:24 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
You what?? i was just pointing out my hoilday pics came out better this year with my C702 than my k800
C702
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]&make=sony+ericsson&model=c702
K800
http://www.esato.com/phonepho[....]y+ericsson&model=k800i+special
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
uhh, wrong sentence quoted (I edited my post above). I have to admit, if we compare both in poor light conditions:
1. not-modified driver: C702 wins easily
2. modified driver: mission impossible for C702
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-11-11 23:40:43, Raiderski wrote:
uhh, wrong sentence quoted (I edited my post above). I have to admit, if we compare both in poor light conditions:
1. not-modified driver: C702 wins easily
2. modified driver: mission impossible for C702
Not really the C702 has to use longer exposure time due to smaller aperture, but the C702 at iso640 has the same quality as K800i at iso 320, My C702 does have a almost completed modded driver it's new max exposure is 1/4 iso640, and 1second for twilight landscape, 1/3 for twlight portrait. your modded driver with 2seconds of exposure time seems impractical no way your gonna be able to hold it still with your hands your always have to find a flat surface to put it on, 1/20 is meant to be the limit for handheld i can do up to 1/3 normally ok hand held, anything else requires somewhere to put the phone.
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
yep, every K800 shot on which ISO is not higher than 400 is not bad. the problem is that K800 often use ISO640 and C702 don't have to go that high. long exposure modes are still the only solution for K800. 2s mode indeed is good only if you have something stable under the camera but there are also much faster modes (1s - 1/3s) quite good enough for shaky hands
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-11-12 09:39 ] |
stain
Joined: Nov 03, 2008
Posts: 14
From: India
PM |
hey number1
thanks for ur reply.
A few more questions!!!
1) Would u rate the c702 audio capability on par with the walkman series?
2) Would u presonally recommend the c702 camera capabilities?
3) Is it possible to use the MXE-60 xenon flash with the c702?
Thanks...
Austin
|
stain
Joined: Nov 03, 2008
Posts: 14
From: India
PM |
another thing number one since u have updates ur firmware!!!
Can u post a video outdoors, indoors with FLASH on so i can get a rought idea of the video recording capability...
Austin |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
1. I'm using modded acoustics so sound is above the walkmans, loudpspeaker is very loud & surpisingly bassy.
2. Yep quality is always good above other camphones, colour can fail sometimes so got to make use of the whitebalances.
3. no idea i don't own 1 , but in the camdriver there is
Property 23, Xenon flash required.
I'l do you video a bit later when i walk the dog i am using a modded driver can record up to 36fps rather than the standard 30fps, also my led flash pics will be different from a standard C702's led flash pics.
|
stain
Joined: Nov 03, 2008
Posts: 14
From: India
PM |
well you could tell me how to do that...
2 years ago i modded my k750i changed acoustics made it quite loud...
Changed the camera drivers which improved cam quality...
Also i had done a 50-50 firmware. fs was w800 and the main of k750i
was quite stable...
i had used far manager and some other xs++, dont really remember...
What are the mods available for c702...
Thanks
Austin
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
C702 is very moddable, just no patches yet, everything can be changed
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=177034
|
stain
Joined: Nov 03, 2008
Posts: 14
From: India
PM |
which firmware are u currently using?
which acoustics are the best?
Which cam drivers are good? |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
I was using R3DA029 the latest but the menus would lag, so i manully flashed my main with R3CA038 which is fine,
Acoustic i got xplodIII for my loudspeaker & a DRC off acoustic for the headphones,
Camdriver i'm using my own one
Display driver i'm also using my own.
|
Lightspeed_x
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Dominican Republic
PM |
Hi, i would like to know what a modded display driver would do, i mean, does it increase brightness, quality of image or what?
Thanks in advance! |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
Heres the display driver, it increases the brightness and gives better contrast.
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=177163
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-11-11 22:10
