Author |
which cam is best for t68i? |
kzee26 Joined: Dec 30, 2002 Posts: 17 From: pque. philippines PM, WWW
|
which is better for t68i mca-20 or mca-25???
|
|
MarkOng Joined: Jun 11, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
If its for a t68, it won't make much of a difference as you can't use the added features like picture framing in the mca-25 with the t68. It was designed with the t300 in mind. Go for the mca-20. Anyway, I suspect it is cheaper. |
Andy. Joined: Apr 27, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
The cameras for t68i are not worth the cash. They only work well in good lighting conditions and max res is 640-480. Spend a bit more cash on a proper digital camera.
This post was posted from a T68i |
rogervdh Joined: Sep 27, 2002 Posts: 48 From: Kerkrade, Netherlands PM, WWW
|
I don't think there is a lot of difference between the MCA-20 and the MCA-25. It would be great if the MCA-25 would support 800x600 or something like thank. Unfortunatly, it supports max. 640x480. I would choose the MCA-20.
Regards, Roger |
omar302 Joined: Aug 01, 2002 Posts: 73 From: Qatar PM |
If you upgrade the sw of the T68i to R6A012 it can use te Zoom feature of the mca-25.
I dont know about the other features.
The mca-20 does not have the zoom and it doesnt have an eye veiwer. |
haki Joined: May 14, 2002 Posts: 390 From: The real MACEDONIA in GREECE PM |
All the extra features of the mca-25, like zooming, effects and viewfinder, work with the t68i with the R6A012 software. So the mca-25 is the natural choice! Have someone who wants to buy a plain t300 buy the one with the mca25. It will only cost you about 70 Euros!
This post was posted from a T68i |
zoolie Joined: Nov 10, 2002 Posts: 19 PM |
Mca 20=72dpi Mca 25=96dpi Thats the difference! Mca20 can store more pics than mca25 couse its only 72dpi.
This post was posted from a T68i |
darkman Joined: Dec 29, 2002 Posts: 138 From: Sweden PM |
Do the cameras make god pics????
--P1i-- |
zoolie Joined: Nov 10, 2002 Posts: 19 PM |
Yes,but only in sunlight. In dark the pics have noise/couse they havent got flash for nightshot/! Its not a digital camera quality but its fine! I like it. :-D
This post was posted from a T68i |
jellyellie Joined: Dec 27, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: England PM, WWW
|
most places r now selling them both for the same price.
www.jellyellie.com |
JwY Joined: Dec 03, 2002 Posts: 500 From: Canada GTA PM |
make sure u get the latest software if u get the mca-25
otherwise it won't be worth it as much. |
bart Joined: Feb 03, 2002 Posts: > 500 From: Flanders PM, WWW
|
i'm working on a revieuw on camera phones. and what i can say is that the best cam is the MCA-25. its better then MCA-20, the nokia cam, 7650,P800 and the panasonic GD87.
now its just wait and see how good the siemens cam is but i think we already have a winner! MCA-25 state of the art.
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA |
JwY Joined: Dec 03, 2002 Posts: 500 From: Canada GTA PM |
that's quality. |
lizardKng Joined: Oct 30, 2002 Posts: 20 PM |
An important thing to consider would be how many pixels the images are made up of. AFAIK the Panasonic have like 120x100 pixels and that is fine for MMS to another phone but not really useful at all for email to watch on a computer screen? |
lizardKng Joined: Oct 30, 2002 Posts: 20 PM |
Andy: Of course the cams are INFINATLEY (sp?) better than ANY digicam that needs to be attached to a computer because if you have no computer with you in you pocket they are... worthless... At least until you get home
[ This Message was edited by: lizardKng on 2002-12-31 02:59 ] |
|