| Author |
Nokia.com - new look |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
just discovered it
http://www.nokia.co.uk/A4221001
looks good and very helpful imo
_________________
Aquila non capit muscas - /// 4ever!
/// Ericsson Forum
[ This Message was edited by: BobaFett on 2008-02-29 05:34 ] |
|
|
Metamorphosi
Joined: Aug 11, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
what's new in this site,i guess it's all the same,can u explain what r the new things exactly? |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
Still, SE's site is miles better. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-29 08:08:26, NightBlade wrote:
Still, SE's site is miles better.
yeah, for a 2 year old. with that red flashy look.
|
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
sorry, it looks the same to me 
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
For how long was it that SE has had these features / options on their website? I'm just asking...
On 2008-03-01 09:04:17, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-29 08:08:26, NightBlade wrote:
Still, SE's site is miles better.
yeah, for a 2 year old. with that red flashy look.
On the contrary, Nokia's site looks like it was developed for dead people.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-03-01 08:31 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-01 09:24:17, Mizzle wrote:
For how long was it that SE has had these features / options on their website? I'm just asking...
On 2008-03-01 09:04:17, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-29 08:08:26, NightBlade wrote:
Still, SE's site is miles better.
yeah, for a 2 year old. with that red flashy look.
On the contrary, Nokia's site looks like it was developed for dead people.
[ This Message was edited by: Mizzle on 2008-03-01 08:31 ]
www.nseries.com
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
QVGA,
I failed to see how that is the NOKIA.COM website - don't you?
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-03-01 09:04:17, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-29 08:08:26, NightBlade wrote:
Still, SE's site is miles better.
yeah, for a 2 year old. with that red flashy look.
Actually it changes colour with every visit...
Again, yes, it is much better than the Nokia site.
(dead people  ) |
deepsme
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: New Delhi, India
PM |
IMO, rather than saying that one site looks better than the other,
I'd say that looking at Nokia's site layout, seems to be more targeted towards businessmen and professionals..
And SE's sites' seem to be targeting the younger college going kind of audience..
But overall one thing that both sites depict in an equally good manner is provide information about their respective mobiles and other stuff..which is what one would basically visit a cellphone site for...rather than look for the greatest site design in the world.
here, have a puff  |
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
Yeah, but still, people like eye-candy.  |
deepsme
Joined: Mar 30, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: New Delhi, India
PM |
I'd rather look for 'eye-candy' and 'cool quotient' in their cell phones and not their websites..
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: deepsme on 2008-03-01 09:23 ] |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-01 09:45:19, Mizzle wrote:
QVGA,
I failed to see how that is the NOKIA.COM website - don't you?
its a part of it. i found it by clicking somewhere in nokia.com
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
Aha, but it is not the nokia.com website, is it?
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-03-01 10:22:11, deepsme wrote:
I'd rather look for 'eye-candy' and 'cool quotient' in their cell phones and not their websites..
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: deepsme on 2008-03-01 09:23 ]
Again, SE has much more eye-candy in their cellphones than Nokia... but that may be just my opinion.
Anyway, moving on... |
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-29 06:34
