| Author |
S60 Demonstration Video on the new Touch UI |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
"S60 expands the UI offering by Touch UI with tactile feedback to create new type of devices and applications and by UI Accelerator Toolkit to create graphically stunning applications."
http://www.slashphone.com/118/9342.html
( video in the link )
| |
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
Graphically stunning, indeed! (not) |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-13 22:42:07, NightBlade wrote:
Graphically stunning, indeed! (not)
see? didnt i tell you everything that comes out of your mouth here is nothing but useless babble. go back to SE forum, for our sake!
|
islandprd
Joined: Nov 29, 2007
Posts: 176
PM |
Anyone notice the lagginess? See the part when she press the clock and nothing happens till 2 sec later. Typical symbian? Hopefully the final product is not laggy |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
I agree with NightBlade, it is indeed graphically stunning!! 
And what innovations they've achieved! "Press the clock to go to clock settings", woooooooooow. I wonder how long this feature (and many, many alike) have been part of UIQ. And lol, how laggy is this?? It's even running on a larger PC with better hardware than phones.
|
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-14 09:51:20, Mizzle wrote:
I agree with NightBlade, it is indeed graphically stunning!!
And what innovations they've achieved! "Press the clock to go to clock settings", woooooooooow. I wonder how long this feature (and many, many alike) have been part of UIQ. And lol, how laggy is this?? It's even running on a larger PC with better hardware than phones.
Ahan, so if we run a symbian on a PC, it will run a lot faster? Are you even remotely technically informed? Its not optimized to run on a PC. They dont even have a phone to run the OS on yet and here we are complaining about how laggy it is.
Dont forget nokia didnt kiss any body's ass, like SE did to HTC, to come up with the touch UI. XPERIA is a result of HTC's expertise and their expertise alone.
Oh i forgot, MS was also involved.
_________________
say hi to my widow for me
N71 + 2GB MiniSD
[ This Message was edited by: QVGA on 2008-02-14 09:00 ] |
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-14 09:57:53, QVGA wrote:
Ahan, so if we run a symbian on a PC, it will run a lot faster? Are you even remotely technically informed? Its not optimized to run on a PC. They dont even have a phone to run the OS on yet and here we are complaining about how laggy it is.
Dont forget nokia didnt kiss any body's ass, like SE did to HTC, to come up with the touch UI. XPERIA is a result of HTC's expertise and their expertise alone.
Yep, I do have lots of technical knowledge, but your comments made me unsure if you do. HTC created XPERIA, eh? Ah ok, almighty know-it-all. XPERIA is a product of SEMC, and not HTC.
Oh, and even if it's not optimized to run on a PC, surely even some of the most worst equipped PC's (like 512 MB RAM, 2 GHz) should be better equipped than, say, a N95 8GB with its 128 MB RAM and 330 MHz. And if it's not optimized to run it, why even bother?
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
On 2008-02-14 09:57:53, QVGA wrote:
Ahan, so if we run a symbian on a PC, it will run a lot faster? Are you even remotely technically informed? Its not optimized to run on a PC. They dont even have a phone to run the OS on yet and here we are complaining about how laggy it is.
That, sir, is complete rubbish. |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-14 10:02:09, Mizzle wrote:
On 2008-02-14 09:57:53, QVGA wrote:
Ahan, so if we run a symbian on a PC, it will run a lot faster? Are you even remotely technically informed? Its not optimized to run on a PC. They dont even have a phone to run the OS on yet and here we are complaining about how laggy it is.
Dont forget nokia didnt kiss any body's ass, like SE did to HTC, to come up with the touch UI. XPERIA is a result of HTC's expertise and their expertise alone.
Yep, I do have lots of technical knowledge, but your comments made me unsure if you do. HTC created XPERIA, eh? Ah ok, almighty know-it-all. XPERIA is a product of SEMC, and not HTC.
Oh, and even if it's not optimized to run on a PC, surely even some of the most worst equipped PC's (like 512 MB RAM, 2 GHz) should be better equipped than, say, a N95 8GB with its 128 MB RAM and 330 MHz. And if it's not optimized to run it, why even bother?
SE alone DID NOT make Xperia, get it? And why even bother with Windows Mobile? What happened to the almighty rubbish UIQ? Suddenly its not good enough to be on their top offering?
Secondly, a PC processor WILL NOT handle a mobile OS in an equally efficient way as a mobile processor will. Nokia hasnt even given a release date for a TS phone and here you are already concluding what a rubbish TS it will be.
|
Mizzle
Joined: Oct 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
QVGA,
Do your homework. XPERIA is the name of the brand and the software to operate with nine home screens. Not the phone.
Why use WM? You do know that it's several times more flexible than both S60 and UIQ, don't you? Well, there's your answer then.
As said, crappy thing to say that a PC CPU won't handle a mobile OS.
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
ahem... before this just keeps bouncing back and forth
the idea of this presentation is to show what the interface will look like.
although we are told it is the actual software running we have no knowledge of whether it is beta, what kind of emulator is running it etc etc, and so I don't think anything more than how the interface looks can be judged here
...and this certainly isn't a discussion of the X1 and nor does every Nokia or SE discussion have to be a Nokia vs SE discussion!
anyway, I'll close this as I know exactly where its headed
| |
|
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
|
Posted: 2008-02-13 22:40
