| Author |
Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot and C902 Cyber-shot discussion |
oddie k750
Joined: Jan 05, 2007
Posts: 399
PM |
On 2008-02-10 22:48:33, Luci'sPower wrote:
well on se.com says that it haves xenon flash
-that you can use while recording video? Unless it also has leds,I don't think so... |
|
|
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Light when you need it
Throw a little light on the subject with xenon flash. It emits a burst of high-intensity light at just the right moment, allowing you to shoot well-lit pictures indoors or in low-light conditions.
from se.com
|
oddie k750
Joined: Jan 05, 2007
Posts: 399
PM |
http://www.sonyericsson.com/c[....]pecifications/c902?cc=gb&lc=en i read: photo flash, photo light, video light-so who knows...
In the k850 the video light was a pair of leds that lit up during video recording. This photo light may be the use of these leds while using best pic.
^but it seems pretty unlikely for a xenon flash+2leds to fit inside this^
[ This Message was edited by: oddie k750 on 2008-02-10 21:58 ]
[ This Message was edited by: oddie k750 on 2008-02-10 22:02 ] |
mustafabay
Joined: Sep 27, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Egypt
PM |
Small screens, eh? Thanks but no thanks. I guess I'll just go for a Z750.
I don't want a signature anymore. |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
i Doubt it has xenon flash...look like is a stronger led flash
__
[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2008-02-10 22:20 ] |
Radiux399
Joined: Sep 06, 2007
Posts: 246
PM |
Wow, the higher end C902 seems to have a very, very tiny aperture. As small as that in the K770i, if not even smaller! If so, its going to really suck at taking low light pictures without having motion blur.
The 3mp C702 seems to be thicker, have a larger lens, and has dual led flash. Almost as if its better at taking pictures than the C902! I also think the 702 looks a lot better. The back panel reminds me of the K810i. |
Superluminova
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: ...Mummies Tummy!
PM |
Gotta say i love the c702!
OBEY GAINT |
paul101
Joined: Mar 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: first to last
PM, WWW
|
____________________
[ This Message was edited by: paul101 on 2008-02-10 22:28 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-02-10 22:48:04, jcwhite_uk wrote:
I seriously doubt that it will have a CCD sensor. They are bulkier, use more power and more expensive. Nowadays CMOS sensors are as good as CCD sensors.
When did you get that impression mate  CMOS sensor are no way better nor par at CCD sensors, you know the reason why DSLR cameras use CMOS sensors is because it's less power intensive than CCDs, yes you're right CCD consumes more power than CMOS, DLSRs cannot fit a better battery module to copensate for the intense power usage by the large CCD. and the mere fact that given the space for the sensor DSLRs can fit large sized APS-C CMOS sensors to ensure quality. large CMOS are capable of producing excellent images but any CMOS smaller than 1/2.5" and has a resolution of 5mpix are no match to a CCD even with a smaller 1/3.0"
10 years at Esato |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
good to see 'more' more digi cam features coming through. ie, face detection!
_________________
May the  be with you!
http://www.modmymobile.net/forum/index.php
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-02-10 23:26 ] |
DarkKrypt
Joined: May 15, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne,Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-11 00:23:11, >500 wrote:
good to see 'more' more digi cam features coming through. ie, face detection!
_________________
May the be with you!
http://www.modmymobile.net/forum/index.php
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-02-10 23:26 ]
word,now theyre realy becoming a cyber-shot range;)
 |  history 5110, 8210, 3310, P900/10,8250, 5210, 1100, 3220, GA628,T105,w810,K550, K610,W880,W910,P1,G900,C905, Satio, x10 mini, arc, XS, XZ, XZ3, XZ5P,XA2U |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-02-11 00:23:11, >500 wrote:
good to see 'more' more digi cam features coming through. ie, face detection!
_________________
May the be with you!
http://www.modmymobile.net/forum/index.php
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-02-10 23:26 ]
those are just gimmicks, what is important is for SE to use CCD otherwise it'll be a major disaster! 
10 years at Esato |
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
i know its nothing major, but its the little things that count! (sometimes)
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-02-11 00:43:50, >500 wrote:
i know its nothing major, but its the little things that count! (sometimes)
yeah sometimes, but i only think of the fact that if SE used a crappy CMOS sensor here then this shouldn't be a cybershot first and foremost. since Cybershots are imaging gadgets and imaging relates to quality pictures and quality pictures are only possible with the use of a proper sensor 
10 years at Esato |
clauf
Joined: Jun 17, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-02-11 00:36:30, razec wrote:
On 2008-02-11 00:23:11, >500 wrote:
good to see 'more' more digi cam features coming through. ie, face detection!
_________________
May the be with you!
http://www.modmymobile.net/forum/index.php
[ This Message was edited by: >500 on 2008-02-10 23:26 ]
those are just gimmicks, what is important is for SE to use CCD otherwise it'll be a major disaster!
It is small gimmicks like that that will get more business to Sony Ericsson. Honestly, the average phone buyer (especially American and Canadian ones) only purchase products because of good-marketing (iPhone) and small nifty features that seem like it's huge mobile development. Sony Ericsson can use it to their advantage now. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-10 22:53
|
history 5110, 8210, 3310, P900/10,8250, 5210, 1100, 3220, GA628,T105,w810,K550, K610,W880,W910,P1,G900,C905, Satio, x10 mini, arc, XS, XZ, XZ3, XZ5P,XA2U
