| Author |
Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot and C902 Cyber-shot discussion |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
On 2008-03-18 20:31:44, darknoob wrote:
,***** image quality is above Sony Ericsson K810.****"
Shorter focal length and all. Go figure |
|
|
NightBlade
Joined: Jul 29, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Nessebar, Bulgaria
PM |
***** image quality is above Sony Ericsson K810.****"
My little world has suddenly collapsed...
[ This Message was edited by: NightBlade on 2008-03-18 19:40 ] |
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
Really nice review!!!
But I don't think the pictures were any better than other 3.2MP cybershot phones... And as it doesn't have a xenon flash, it seems it can't beat K800/K810 in night pics... Though I would love to see comparison pics... |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
On 2008-03-18 21:28:48, hgautam wrote:
Really nice review!!!
But I don't think the pictures were any better than other 3.2MP cybershot phones... And as it doesn't have a xenon flash, it seems it can't beat K800/K810 in night pics... Though I would love to see comparison pics...
I was originally thinking the same thing, but every thing I've read about the new LEDs on the C702 and C902 say they're as good or better than the xeon. It's not old LED technology but new, or newer at least. We shall see I guess. |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
On 2008-03-18 21:43:25, Paul in LA wrote:
On 2008-03-18 21:28:48, hgautam wrote:
Really nice review!!!
But I don't think the pictures were any better than other 3.2MP cybershot phones... And as it doesn't have a xenon flash, it seems it can't beat K800/K810 in night pics... Though I would love to see comparison pics...
I was originally thinking the same thing, but every thing I've read about the new LEDs on the C702 and C902 say they're as good or better than the xeon. It's not old LED technology but new, or newer at least. We shall see I guess.
its only the c902 that uses the photoflash wereas the c702 uses good old led flash |
Paul in LA
Joined: Jul 23, 2007
Posts: 138
From: Los Angeles
PM |
On 2008-03-19 01:03:07, k850 successor wrote:
On 2008-03-18 21:43:25, Paul in LA wrote:
On 2008-03-18 21:28:48, hgautam wrote:
Really nice review!!!
But I don't think the pictures were any better than other 3.2MP cybershot phones... And as it doesn't have a xenon flash, it seems it can't beat K800/K810 in night pics... Though I would love to see comparison pics...
I was originally thinking the same thing, but every thing I've read about the new LEDs on the C702 and C902 say they're as good or better than the xeon. It's not old LED technology but new, or newer at least. We shall see I guess.
its only the c902 that uses the photoflash wereas the c702 uses good old led flash
Well that simply sucks. I rarely use the flash but regular LEDs are almost useless. |
Seanyb2
Joined: Jan 26, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
I just read review on GSM Arena very nice phone i really love the new look menu the one where it rotates in like 3D. Very cool that reminds me of the old 3D menus from old Sony phones. But if this is dust and splash proof where is the cover for the charger socket.
|
hgautam
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
@Paul in LA
I have used C902 also and it's Photo flash is not as strong as Xenon, though it's better than LED... I wish SE used 2 Photo Flash instead of one... It would have been great then...
So don't expect the photo flash to be that good people... |
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
found a demo video of c702. wonder why the color of c702 is like that..
http://www.planete-se.net/index.php?showtopic=24062&st=20
bottom part of the page
nice to know too that c702 scored excellently in the speakerphone test of gsmarena 
another video that tests dust and water resistancy of c702:
http://www.planete-se.net/index.php?showtopic=24062&st=40
amazing!
_________________
its not all about the money... the best things in life are free! 
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2008-03-21 09:35 ] |
bronxdude
Joined: Sep 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
well, c702 is my new baby |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-03-27 22:16:11, bronxdude wrote:
well, c702 is my new baby
thats nice. when is it due?
|
zaxan
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 417
From: United Kingdom
PM |
On 2008-03-27 22:29:24, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-03-27 22:16:11, bronxdude wrote:
well, c702 is my new baby
thats nice. when is it due?
End of may mate  |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
The c702s focal lengh is only 4.2mm my k800 is 5.2mm.
|
zaxan
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 417
From: United Kingdom
PM |
Thanks @crossmatched , that video really does show the durability of the c702 well  |
--anx--
Joined: Feb 26, 2008
Posts: 38
PM, WWW
|
I'm really looking forward for C902...for me it will be a good handset... |
|
|
Posted: 2008-03-18 20:37
