| Author |
Sony Ericsson C702 Cyber-shot and C902 Cyber-shot discussion |
zaxan
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 417
From: United Kingdom
PM |
On 2008-02-12 18:00:08, number1 wrote:
what about the c702 it shouldn't be as bad because it's not over-loaded with megapixels it has 3.2mp i was hoping it would have a sony sensor, i think the c902 has a micron sensor that means the c702 might aswell, the k850 has a sony camera module & sensor.
imo the k810 produces pretty decent pics for a 3.2mp camera phone so if the p702 either matches or even beats the k810 I would class it as having a very respectable camera on board 
[ This Message was edited by: zaxan on 2008-02-12 17:10 ] |
|
|
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
C702 hasn't xenon flash either, but i don't know about pic quality. only time will tell. |
Guto_ViP
Joined: Sep 24, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: |Brazil|
PM, WWW
|
http://www.sonyericsson.com/c[....]ephones/topics/c902/photophone
Here say the flash is Xenon on C902!  |
zaxan
Joined: Jun 01, 2007
Posts: 417
From: United Kingdom
PM |
Although it says it has on the  website the c902 doesn't have xenon flash. Often you will see errors on the website regarding phones specs and this is just another example of this afaik  |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
c702 looks way better than c902 :-/
I was expecting something more beautiful from SE. Some high-tech beauty. And that screen again.. so small. pity
k850i and k810i have a very good design. C series lack it. |
Coquito
Joined: Mar 28, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Moca, Rep.Dom
PM, WWW
|
i like c702 design
the dust and water proof is really cool!!!
[ This Message was edited by: coquito on 2008-02-12 22:42 ] |
crossmatched
Joined: Jan 05, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: RP
PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-11 20:19:53, milan91 wrote:
C702i have 4.2mm lens...
C702i is so good and good design, and all options, if price is normal i will buy it 
i fear this 4.2mm focal length will produce much noisier pics in lowlight conditions.
k800/k810 has 5.2mm
P1 has 4.8mm
nokia 6500 slide has 4.5mm
i like though the design and features. i just hope c702 will capture photos better than k770 (if it can not be at par with k800/k810)
_________________
its not all about the money... the best things in life are free!
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2008-02-12 22:49 ] |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM |
On 2008-02-12 23:47:04, crossmatched wrote:
On 2008-02-11 20:19:53, milan91 wrote:
C702i have 4.2mm lens...
C702i is so good and good design, and all options, if price is normal i will buy it
i fear this 4.2mm focal length will produce much noisier pics in lowlight conditions.
k800/k810 has 5.2mm
P1 has 4.8mm
nokia 6500 slide has 4.5mm
i like though the design and features. i just hope c702 will capture photos better than k770 (if it can not be at par with k800/k810)
_________________
its not all about the money... the best things in life are free!
[ This Message was edited by: crossmatched on 2008-02-12 22:49 ]
i think C902 camera will beat K850's. K850's single yet major issue with the cam quality was the nasty lens protector (with no low-pass filter) that causes all those purple fringing thingy and amplifies the noise even more exaggeratedly than G800's smaller sensor.
10 years at Esato |
kjao
Joined: Apr 24, 2007
Posts: 200
PM |
how does the camera module slide out i wonder...is there a button? or do we need to manually open it with both hands. since it's located only at the top part of the phone, it doesn't look as though u can slide it open to activate it with one hand |
Erotomaniac
Joined: Sep 27, 2005
Posts: 82
From: Novaliches
PM |
I don't like the designs of these two.
c702, very unelegant look. I know they're for rugged use but it does not have to look the part.
c902, boring look.
I was impressed by the features that's why I said they were nice, but now that i've taken a better gander at them, i'm a bit disappointed.
I applaud SE though for the direction they have taken with the keypads. wide and ample. I'm glad that it seems they have done away with the small squares.
I hope c702's cam takes great pics. especially scenic shots. if your an outdoor/hiking buff then this is the perfect phone. capturing those breath-taking views while on the top of a mountain, beautiful islands while on a boat out at sea, wild flora/fauna in the middle of a jungle.
I know it's still not a replacement for dedicated camera but if you want to save space with your packing and you're not too much into high reso images then then this is a welcome adventure gear. |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
Regarding the xenon flash....
it does not have xenon flash............. but it is not LED either (M-R is making a mistake)
this new technology is called (((photo flash))) and is OFFICIALLY stated that it matches xenon flash in case of photo lighting...
you see? it is called optimal lighting for exellent picture quality...
[ This Message was edited by: chombos1 on 2008-02-13 06:52 ] |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-02-13 03:11:01, razec wrote:
i think C902 camera will beat K850's. K850's single yet major issue with the cam quality was the nasty lens protector (with no low-pass filter) that causes all those purple fringing thingy and amplifies the noise even more exaggeratedly than G800's smaller sensor.
As far as i know purple fringing issue is because of microlenses.
and Eldar wrote:
the camera module is different, so don’t expect it to produce K850i-grade snaps; however the maker says they won’t be all that worse.
to me it means worse pic quality, and it make sense, because C902 is 6 millimeter thinner than K850i, shorter focal length, and predictably narrower aperture, so camera module should be different. just like K750i and K550i cam modules.
and for C702: if its pic quality is better or even on par with K800/K810, i think it's acceptable, otherwise it's another failure.  |
baconnugget
Joined: Jun 08, 2005
Posts: 429
PM |
both handset r nice, does anyone know whether the screen are scratch proof i.e mineral glass? |
Viking_40
Joined: Mar 02, 2006
Posts: 12
PM |
On 2008-02-11 15:38:56, oddie k750 wrote:
On 2008-02-11 15:15:48, crossmatched wrote:
any word about c702 and c902's video recording capabilities?
what resolution?
what frame rate?
I read that the x1 has vga resolution @ 30frames/sec. - so I think a new top-line cybershot ought to have it too.
do you have a link would be great if they did but wouldn't SE anounce that in the features? |
chombos1
Joined: Jun 06, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: IRAN.
PM |
go here and check
finaly VGA 30fps from SE.
http://www.sonyericsson.com/x[....]t.aspx?cc=GB&lc=en&lc=en&cc=US |
|
|
Posted: 2008-02-12 18:06
