Author |
se k-series differences . . . |
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
OK, so I saw this K770 sometime ago . . and FOUND out that it's a 3.2 MP camfone Now what made it DIFFERENT from: K800i and K790 aside from the 3.2 MP Auto-Focus cam that they all have Whose the BEST amongst the THREE . . .
[addsig] |
|
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
k790 is no umts fone. next to it, imo se wanted to follow the nokia way of marketing, sell the "almost" same fones 3 times. it works for nokia, but not for se as i see... k770 is very ugly imo, really donnow why se launched it, especially after k800, k790 and k810...
|
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
@boba - Well, I find the K770, a cutie mate . . . thanks for adding the K810i too (I forgot that) . . . so, what's the BEST for you The K810i
[addsig] |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
non of them, dont like and use se fones. well, the lila k770 is a bit strange imo... it would ok as a lady fone maybe
|
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
@boba - So, you've NOT been using fones for a loooong time now
I really LIKE the K770i . . . ithas a strikingresemblance with that of the: BROWN, K800i too
[addsig] |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
i dont use se fones since ages
http://www.esato.com/phones/index.php?phone=220&cp=221&cp2=271
http://www.esato.com/phones/index.php/phone=297
|
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
@boba - The first LINK does NOT show . . .
While the 2nd one is NICE ! I might quite AGREE with you that it's a fone after all . .. but I really LIKE it.
[addsig] |
Radiux399 Joined: Sep 06, 2007 Posts: 246 PM |
The K770i is more or less the same as the K800i. It does have a few advantages, and a few disadvantages though. The main advantages are that its a good bit thinner, and it has a nice flush camera lens which won't open in your pocket. The earpiece is also louder.
The main disadvantages are : no xenon flash, smaller lens means greater possibility for blurred shot in low light conditions, and no sleep mode clock. |
sranjanm2002 Joined: Jun 15, 2005 Posts: 271 From: Jaipur , Rajasthan , INDIA PM, WWW
|
K810i is still the Best Cyber-shot available at reasonable choice. I really don't know why you still looking at K770i.
|
razec Joined: Aug 20, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pearl of the Orient Seas PM |
On 2008-01-06 06:46:48, sranjanm2002 wrote:
K810i is still the Best Cyber-shot available at reasonable choice. I really don't know why you still looking at K770i.
because he wants:
-slim size
-light effects
-very fine display that doesnt degrade image quality even looking at diff. angles
-LED Flash
for me K800 is the best of them all in terms of useability K810 keypad is okay but K800 is better imo
~19 years at Esato |
technical-expert Joined: Mar 13, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Pacific Rim PM |
K770 is so slim fashionable with brown and beautiful in real life(amazed at holding one)
Nice use of sliding cover,No protruding lens cover,looks better from behind like a digicam.
K800-Nice classic look,little bulky doesnt look good from behind due to lens cover.
K810-Nice reduction in size and lens cover,worst keypad and joystick,And uneven design makes simplicity and classic looking k800i way a ahead.
Best Pic quality:k800i
Best camera Function:k800i
(Best pic & Xenon Flash)
Best looking phone:k770i
Best usbability:k770i
Best design :k770i
[ This Message was edited by: itouch on 2008-01-06 06:22 ] |
*Jojo* Joined: Oct 15, 2003 Posts: > 500 PM |
@i touch - Nice comparison mate . . . neva KNEW that the K770i does NOThave a built-in xenon flash !
[addsig] |
sunrise_ Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Posts: 325 PM |
K770i has smaller screen than K800i/K810i. 1.9" instead of 2".
|
SilveR. Joined: May 03, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
For me K770 looks ok, I mean midrange phone itäs ok...
But as I said before every one has different taste of things..
--------------------- |
|