| Author |
W610i vs K810i |
KCC4
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 175
From: England, North London
PM |
This is difficult... im gona get a new phone for christmas... And im amazed already by the Walkman 3.0( or so ), and the fantastic slide design... But really Dont want 3.2 megapixels and slim design go to waste!!! Im confused!!!
Help!! :S
And i must add... if i get the W610i... then i still have about £40 left for christmas....
_________________
How manyEsato Arguements have you had? Whats your myspace/facebook?
[ This Message was edited by: KCC4 on 2007-11-11 19:01 ] |
|
|
mo-00786
Joined: Sep 13, 2007
Posts: 204
From: London
PM |
5310 lol
|
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
simply if you dont need a 3.2mpix and need a good walkman go for w610 |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
go for k810 
It is better than w610 in many aspects:
much better camera
better and bigger screen
good design
3G
nearly as good musicplayer
|
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
simply if you dont need a 3.2mpix and need a good walkman go for w610 |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
simply if you dont need a 3.2mpix and need a good walkman go for w610 |
KCC4
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 175
From: England, North London
PM |
Put it this way. I want a phone with the same walkman version as W610i but with 3.2 mpx cam. Which shud i go for?
|
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
On 2007-11-11 19:55:00, croatia wrote:
simply if you dont need a 3.2mpix and need a good walkman go for w610
why have you written the same thing 3 times |
KCC4
Joined: Jun 26, 2007
Posts: 175
From: England, North London
PM |
On 2007-11-11 19:57:02, k850 successor wrote:
On 2007-11-11 19:55:00, croatia wrote:
simply if you dont need a 3.2mpix and need a good walkman go for w610
why have you written the same thing 3 times
I was gona ask that too... maybe croatia is just a very anti k810i guy 
_________________
How manyEsato Arguements have you had? Whats your myspace/facebook?
[ This Message was edited by: KCC4 on 2007-11-11 18:59 ] |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
|
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
sorry litlle prob with my cellphone or network |
croatia
Joined: Aug 06, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: zagreb croatia europe
PM |
[quote]
On 2007-11-11 19:56:29, KCC4 wrote:
Put it this way. I want a phone with the same walkman version as W610i but with 3.2 mpx cam. Which shud i go for?
currently dont exist in s.e. portfolio i mean 3.2mpix with walkman 3.0 afaik,k850 got walkman 3.0. but with 5mpix |
BadBoyTC
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Posts: 26
From: Manchester, England.
PM |
[quote]
On 2007-11-11 20:26:00, croatia wrote:
On 2007-11-11 19:56:29, KCC4 wrote:
Put it this way. I want a phone with the same walkman version as W610i but with 3.2 mpx cam. Which shud i go for?
currently dont exist in s.e. portfolio i mean 3.2mpix with walkman 3.0 afaik,k850 got walkman 3.0. but with 5mpix
The Sony Ericsson W890i is 3 Meg and the latest Walkman player but I'm not sure when it is released. |
C905
Joined: Jul 08, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM |
[quote]
On 2007-11-11 20:55:00, BadBoyTC wrote:
On 2007-11-11 20:26:00, croatia wrote:
On 2007-11-11 19:56:29, KCC4 wrote:
Put it this way. I want a phone with the same walkman version as W610i but with 3.2 mpx cam. Which shud i go for?
currently dont exist in s.e. portfolio i mean 3.2mpix with walkman 3.0 afaik,k850 got walkman 3.0. but with 5mpix
The Sony Ericsson W890i is 3 Meg and the latest Walkman player but I'm not sure when it is released.
w890 has 3.2 MP but with no AF, its camera is bad compared to w610 |
jtavera
Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Posts: 13
PM, WWW
|
I prefer w610 |
|
|
Posted: 2007-11-11 19:49
