| Author |
The first man on earth? |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-03 18:52:29, comfort mdu wrote:
I wonder if you have taken into consideraton the process of animatter. If people are a result of a complex reaction tnen where does the concept of antimatter fit.
Anti-matter is a separate subject from evolution. Anti-matter does not exist naturally on Earth and thus has no bearing on how different forms of matter interact with one another in chemical reactions.
I trully do not understand why you dont want to agree with the fact that there once existed first people on earth. As I haver said, the fact remains that science can not proove all that we want it to proove to us.
There was no first man or woman in the Biblical sense. Human beings, like all other life on this planet, evolved from previous life forms over millions of years. There is a great deal of scientific evidence for this.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
|
|
aatuif
Joined: Sep 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: KASHMIR
PM, WWW
|
i'd love to be the LAST 'MAN' on earth!!! 
|
msmmsm
Joined: Sep 03, 2003
Posts: 187
From: Edinburgh
PM |
Do you mean the last man, with the entire population being female?  |
PeterKay
Joined: Jul 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: The Ummah
PM, WWW
|
LOL
|
josefcool25
Joined: Aug 15, 2007
Posts: 14
PM |
the first thing what i wanna say is that i am a muslim addam is the first human who was created on earth and all humans are created from ground that's the veritable story /sorry for my bad english ;for more informations :if you have a java enabled phone go to www.getjar.com download pocket quran in english and you will understand.
the power of sony ericsson |
cokker
Joined: Aug 15, 2005
Posts: 56
From: Norwich, UK
PM |
scotsboyuk: There was no first man or woman in the Biblical sense. Human beings, like all other life on this planet, evolved from previous life forms over millions of years. There is a great deal of scientific evidence for this.
Agreed 100%.
I won't go into detail what i think about religion apart from it's the biggest load of tripe ever conceived.
This is my opinion, ignore it if you don't like it.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: cokker on 2007-09-05 00:47 ] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2007-09-04 09:16:44, goldenface wrote:
@comfort mdu
I would like to hear your thoughts on why people in hot countries tend to have darker skin.
. . . well I live in a HOT country . . . but it's NOT always like that matey . . . because we have - ALBINOs here   !
[addsig] |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
That is why I said that adaptation has nothing to do with this. If you guys believe in that people were a result of complex chemical reactions and evolution took it from there, are you implying that what we read in our religious books is a false satement?
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-07 12:15 ] |
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
What is said in the holy book shouldn't be taken literally - IMO.
However, if you believe that at one time there was just one man and just one woman then I respect your beliefs, but this idea doesn't hold up well when modern scientific concepts are applied.
Inbreeding would be a problem if there was just one man and woman. The appearance of Neanderthal man and the Dinosaurs, should not these be accounted for in the holy book?
_________________
Check out the UK's UK's Best Selling Phones
Voted Best European Member 2007 by Esato Members
[ This Message was edited by: goldenface on 2007-09-05 07:33 ] |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
Yes Mate
I do not deny what you are saying and I will 2say it once again: I belive in that there once existed first people on earth, not a first person
If you look closely at the accounts that I have quoted in the bibe, at first God said let there be people.
The bilble doesnt say that Adam was the first man on earth but it says that he was first to be made by Gods hands as opposed to the worb of mouth as we see it in the first account.
As for the scientific facts, I truly believe and atreangthen that Beyond what science can not answer God holds the answers for that as the bible states that he was present before time. Whatever it is said that people evolved from is simply nothing but the so-called first people if ican side with the scientist just for one second.
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-07 12:23 ] |
batesie
Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
the bible is fictional
they should only be listened to as a loose guide to how modern morals should be based on. ie the 10 commandments....
the rest is a load of cobbles 
[addsig] |
Yoruichi
Joined: May 10, 2007
Posts: 82
From: Many Places
PM |
interesting thread. I dont believe that humans are the offspring of just 2 ppl humanity wouldnt have been a viable species due to inbreeding. as to religions- a crutch for the weak and convenient excuse for humans to slaughter each other over a god who doesnt exist. look at history and at the world today humans are still slaughtering each other over primitive superstition.
Namo Amitabha |
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-05 04:40:34, comfort mdu wrote:
That is why I said that adaptation has nothing to do with this. If you guys believe in that people were a result of complex chemical reactions and evolution took it from there, are you implying that what we read in our religious books is a false satement?
If I may correct you; I don't 'believe' that humans are the result of evolution, I 'know' we are the result of evolution based upon the evidence we have that supports evolution. Evolution does not require belief or faith, it is a scientific theory that has evidence that one can look at for one's self.
You are entitled to believe whatever you wish of course, but, and at the risk of sounding rude, that doesn't make it true.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
Twometre
Joined: May 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Manzini, Swaziland
PM, WWW
|
On 2007-09-05 11:13:22, batesie wrote:
the bible is fictional
they should only be listened to as a loose guide to how modern morals should be based on. ie the 10 commandments....
the rest is a load of cobbles
The bible is a miraculous and one true famous book. Everything in gt is true. To me it is a book of guidance, inspiration and a holy constitution.
_________________
Please help me find a signature of the
The firtst man on earth
[ This Message was edited by: Twometre on 2008-04-10 13:29 ] |
batesie
Joined: Feb 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London, UK
PM |
@comfort....
as scotsboy said, "You are entitled to believe whatever you wish of course, but, and at the risk of sounding rude, that doesn't make it true."
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-09-04 16:36
