Esato

Forum > General discussions > Garbage threads > Hey Masseur. Can we have a small flaming war?

Previous  123 ... 111213  Next
Author Hey Masseur. Can we have a small flaming war?
sapporobaby
J110 Cream
Joined: Sep 14, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Finland. Kuwait maybe :)
PM
Posted: 2007-10-31 06:02
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post

On 2007-10-26 00:52:53, max_wedge wrote:
Actually sapporobaby, iPhone is a crippled giant, and SE is David with a slingshot. You can have your crippled propietary lump of technology if you want it, I'd take a P1 over iphone any day of the week

btw, I'm quite happy with my K800 but bluetooth is a week link (in terms of large data transfers), if I had a P1 I'd get more real world use out of the wifi than 90% of the people out there who just happen to have wifi in their phone (most of the people I know with wifi on their phone don't use it. When I mention it they usually don't even realise they have it.)

I'm not a feature whore, I don't mind if something is a little slower, as long as it can be done.

Unless it's camera's and sorry to say but SE DO Make the best all round AF cameras available in phones at the moment.

_________________
File System Tweaks for the K750 K750 Tricks
K800 Tips and Themes
Max's K800 Page

[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2007-10-26 00:07 ]


Possibly true but really. Who cares about camera phones really. If I want to take pictures I break out the Nikon. Camera phones are just a marketing add-on to sell more phones. Many in this forum fall for the marketing crap and whine and complain about this mega-pixel level or that mega-pixel level. Does anyone really rely on a camera phone for their photographic needs? When camera phones can shoot in RAW, then I might be interested.
*edited on a Mac of course. Mac: There is no substitute*

N82(YES), iPhone 3G, Shure es530, Nikon D300, more stuff. No more SE stuff, why am I still here?
RevoWution
K800 Silver
Joined: May 26, 2007
Posts: 231
From: New Zealand
PM
Posted: 2007-11-01 04:36
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
K800i's are good though camera-phones though hehe!

Btw, has Masseur even posted at this thread before? Lol.
Sony Ericsson K800i (Concrete Silver) w/ R8BA024 Taiwan Casino Royale firmware, 2GB M2 memory card w/ various mods.
My Wordpress Blog
unique1
T66 black
Joined: Nov 18, 2007
Posts: 8
From: London, UK
PM
Posted: 2007-11-24 21:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
k800's a crap camera phone
even the w810i has a better camera due to a better and more expensive sensor on the w810i

with a high compression rate camera driver for the w810i, it knocks the hell outta k800i one

I say that coz i have a k810i too

[ This Message was edited by: unique1 on 2007-11-24 20:18 ]
humphreybc
K800 Black
Joined: Oct 10, 2007
Posts: 64
From: Christchurch, New Zealand
PM
Posted: 2007-11-28 07:12
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
*cough* PS3 is better than XBOX 360 *cough*


*cough* Wii rules all *cough*

whizkidd
W950 Blue
Joined: May 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: India
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-11-28 09:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2007-10-31 06:02:09, sapporobaby wrote:

Possibly true but really. Who cares about camera phones really. If I want to take pictures I break out the Nikon. Camera phones are just a marketing add-on to sell more phones. Many in this forum fall for the marketing crap and whine and complain about this mega-pixel level or that mega-pixel level. Does anyone really rely on a camera phone for their photographic needs? When camera phones can shoot in RAW, then I might be interested.



You are wrong in assuming that there are people who dont use Camera Phones for serious photography. Mobile phones are sold all over the world and this means different markets with different dynamics. Not everyone requires an SLR. While there is no doubt regarding the fact that no camera phone will ever come close to a dedicated digicam in terms of image quality in the near future, I can safely say people ARE using camera phones for serious photography needs. This is not because they are unaware of the fact that digicams do have better image quality. This is simply because image quality in camera phones have reached an "acceptable level". There is also the all important affordability factor. For an untrained eye, image quality might not matter much. Phones are being sold here with offers for free print outs for images taken by them. Definitely a marketing ploy - but there are takers and thats what matters. Add to the fact that you are getting an all in one device which nullifies the requirement for seperate device for all your needs. Although cameras in phones started off as a gimmick, gone are the 640*480 days. The war is still being fought on the mega-pixel front. While purits may cringe, they have to be contented in having the option to buy the best devices for their varied needs. An Ipod for personal music, a Nikon for photography. For the masses, they would be happy with an N73 offering decent (printable) image and sound quality for music on the go. I can't imagine myself carrying three or four devices in my pocket while going to work. And yes, I do have a digicam which I use frequently but my cellphone serves me well for casual and serious photography as I do not always carry my digicam with me.
T230 >> T610 >> Ngage QD >> N73 >> N85 >> Omnia HD >> And countless other review units
procterdc
W810 black
Joined: Jun 03, 2005
Posts: 334
From: Lytham St.Annes
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-12-08 12:46
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Here's one for english vs americans lol...

Hatton Vs Mayweather Jr

Hatton is gonna kill him tonight - YEAH!!!
It ain't about how hard you hit, its about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward - Rocky Balboa
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 03:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I'll GO with - Mayweather-friend here . . . [addsig]
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 04:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I hate mayweather! - the reason is obvious imho when you hear him speak ... Hatton will kick his a**
10 years at Esato
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 04:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@razec - How about a BET matey If Mayflower WINS . . . you will change your USERNAME to: Jojo's Servant . . . BUT if: Patton wins . . . Ill change MINE to : Kuya Cezar's . . . house that [addsig]
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 04:41
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^ No i can't do that
10 years at Esato
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 04:44
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ME either . . . Kuya Cezar's GHOST (RIP) might haunt me . . . [addsig]
razec
W800
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Mars
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 05:01
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
^^ Who that guy? he even shares the same name with me and i'm still alive!
10 years at Esato
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 05:22
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@raze - You don't KNOW him He's the veeeery famoso AM Radio Announcer who reports soooooo SLOW (as he speaks) . . . I remember ONE time when he made a LIVE-report on a basketball game held locally . . . the GAME itself had already finished, while he is still making his 2nd Quarter assessment report on the game . . . [addsig]
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 06:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@raze - Good THING you did NOT BITE with my BET . . .

As per Yahoo Sports:

__________________________________________
Mayweather stops Hatton to retain title in 10th round

By TIM DAHLBERG, AP Boxing Writer
December 9, 2007

AP - Dec 7, 6:13 pm EST
More Photos



LAS VEGAS (AP) -- Floyd Mayweather Jr. didn't need to dance to beat Ricky Hatton. His fists proved a lot more potent than his feet.

Mayweather remained unbeaten Saturday night and retained his claim to being the best pound-for-pound fighter in the world by stopping Hatton in the 10th round of a brawl that featured none of the fancy footwork he has shown in the ring and on reality TV.

Hatton wouldn't let Mayweather move, but it didn't matter as Mayweather used precision punches to wear down the challenger for his 147-round crown. Hatton kept trying to get inside and score points, but Mayweather had an answer for everything he did.

The end came after Mayweather landed a crushing left hook that dropped Hatton on his back in Mayweather's corner. Hatton got up at the count of eight, but Mayweather almost immediately got him on the ropes and landed another flurry of punches to the head.

Hatton went down almost on a delayed reaction, while at the same time referee Joe Cortez moved in to stop the fight and Hatton's corner threw in the towel at 1:35 of the round.

__________________________________________


LINK:

http://sports.yahoo.com/box/n[....]tton&prov=ap&type=lgns
[addsig]
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-12-09 07:08
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@razor -





ngwek, ngwek, ngwek . . . ! [addsig]
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi
Previous  123 ... 111213  Next
Goto page:
Lock this Topic Move this Topic Delete this Topic