| Author |
Is the N95 as bad as the N80 was? |
Danny_BFC
Joined: Jun 18, 2006
Posts: 499
From: Barnsley, Phone,
PM |
Sorry this thread made me sound a fool so i removed it. delete it please massuer
[ This Message was edited by: ..:/Ğanny:.. on 2007-08-04 01:10 ] |
|
|
goldenface
Joined: Dec 17, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Liverpool City Centre
PM |
Eh, you! Watch it 
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
no, n95 is better imo... i do get your point, cos n80 was a really buggy one in the first time, n95 is not
|
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
agreed! n95 is better than n80, bugs wise. N80 was pretty bad!
|
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
On 2007-08-04 10:18:40, >500 wrote:
agreed! n95 is better than n80, bugs wise. N80 was pretty bad!
and it sucked in processing speed, 220Mhz CPU is tad too slow for a feature packed S60 N-series smartphone. not to mention N95 has animations in it's menu either 
~19 years at Esato |
Tsepz_GP
Joined: Dec 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Johannesburg, South Africa
PM |
Wel i hope not,although i just got an N80 2weeks ago and im loving this little monster,i havent had any problems with it so far just sometimes it does tend to be slow,otherwise im realy enjoyin the N80, and may get an N95 either now or next year when my upgrade comes, im stil not sure what people complaind about,maybe im just one of the lucky ones this time
Phone: Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max Silver
Tablet: Apple iPad Pro 11†Space Grey
Previously owned SEs: W800,W900,W880,K850 & Xperia X10 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
probably u got it with the latest fw, cos the first one of n80 was really crap
|
p900 lover
Joined: Jan 08, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM |
I got the N80 when it has its 1st fw and it was slooow lol, i then left it for like 4 months on my shelf and decided to sell it so i updated the fw and bang it was fast. Not as fast as my N95 tho |
|
|
Posted: 2007-08-04 02:09
