| Author |
SE T68i vs Samsung T100 colours |
SET300
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: 3
PM |
http://www.ocworkbench.com/2002/samsung/t100/colorshoot.htm |
|
|
jcpsad
Joined: Oct 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
feature-wise T68i is a runaway winner... but in design aesthetics i'd go for samsung because of the colors and poly's.
www.photos.panelo.com
www.panelo.com
www.bilog.panelo.com
www.pbalive.panelo.com |
orang3
Joined: Mar 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Never_never_Land
PM, WWW
|
it has already been discuss..
Sex is like hacking. You get in, you get out, and you hope you didn't leave something behind that can be traced back to you |
jj03
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
No one cares about the t100 its a crap phne! That was out of date b4 it was released pmpl
This post was posted from a T68i |
Calvin c",)
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: 108
From: neverland
PM, WWW
|
If we're going to stick with the title of this thread and talk strictly about color display, the Samsung T100 is capable of displaying 4096 colors compared to only 256 by  t68 series. |
Cophia
Joined: Jul 22, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney
PM |
4096 colours is still not enough for photograph quality, you need at least 65k colours (despite what Nokia and others say, see Palm m130 against Palm m515 - you can definitely tell the difference).
Despite that, the more colours the better and it's still better than b/w.
The Samsung T100 also has a bigger display.
However, the T100 main selling point is it's screen. It doesn't have much else to add to the phone (apart from polyphonic ringtones). It will soon be replaced by an MMS version.
|
Porter
Joined: Nov 03, 2002
Posts: 71
From: Bulgaria
PM |
forgot about T100 - there's now Samsung S100 ! 65k colours,MMS,Bluethooth (I think),GPRS,IR ... much better then T100 |
dal_l
Joined: Mar 23, 2002
Posts: 97
PM |
Yup ... S100 kick ass!!! 65K of goodness ..... |
Jowi
Joined: Feb 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Pilipinas
PM, WWW
|
still prefer t68i |
georgied
Joined: Oct 03, 2002
Posts: 156
From: Manchester, UK
PM |
I've played about with the T100, it's a nice little phone but has nothing on the T68. |
nookiehunter
Joined: Aug 04, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: My I-Mate JasJar
PM, WWW
|
only good thing about the samsung phone is the color depth and the lcd. other than that, the T68i kicks it's ass...
I Came...
I Saw...
I Kicked Ass... |
Ruvjet
Joined: Mar 22, 2002
Posts: 268
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-11-26 14:27, Porter wrote:
forgot about T100 - there's now Samsung S100 ! 65k colours,MMS,Bluethooth (I think),GPRS,IR ... much better then T100
|
|
S100 does not have MMS or bluetooth.
and the screen on S100 is STN, not TFT. that means if you put them side by side, the T100 screen actually looks better, even though it has less colours. |
701
Joined: Nov 26, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Romania
PM, WWW
|
I PREFFER THE T 100 CUZ IT IS USER FRIENDLY,CUZ THE SAMSUNG ìS VERY INTERESTING! HOW MUCH IS THE S100?
This post was posted from a WAP device |
cellularblach
Joined: Nov 25, 2002
Posts: 34
From: Europe;-)
PM |
Well,
i ask myself why you compare a 256 display to a 65000(or higher) display - doesn`t make mich sence!
Or do you also compare a Nokia 2110 to a P800 ?;-)
*cellularBlach*
Creating a phone - selling it and getting more than half of them back caused by BUGS - yeah - So on NOKIA  |
Scoobydoo
Joined: Nov 01, 2002
Posts: 113
From: Basingstoke, UK
PM |
Perhaps when replace the t68 we will get a similar sized phone with all the same features PLUS polyphonic tone and at least a 4k colour screen.
What more could u ask for? .. the right features on the right brand!
|
|
|
Posted: 2002-11-26 05:33
