Author |
I can't help it.W580 vs Nokia new 5070 |
c96sthl Joined: Mar 31, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
I think this should be a direct competing product since both are non
smart phone and consider mid to low end phone
for sure W580 rocks in my opinion  |
|
Wesley_NL Joined: Mar 24, 2007 Posts: 39 PM |
w580 is the nicest looking phone atm imo
[ This Message was edited by: Wesley_NL on 2007-03-30 11:45 ] |
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
Uhhh....that is the most retarded comparison i've ever seen.
Its suppose to be 5700vs W580/850 and nokia beats the living crap out of both of them.
P.S. Atleast compare music phone to music phone. Duh! |
Dups! Joined: Sep 24, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: GMT +2 PM |
@QVGA- and exactly where does the nokia come up on top in this particular comparison? |
nettl Joined: Oct 17, 2006 Posts: 89 PM |
Stereo speakers, for starters...
and yeah, comparing two low/mid-end phones which are seperated by 250€ is plainly stupid. |
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
On 2007-03-30 12:20:00, EMS06 wrote:
@QVGA- and exactly where does the nokia come up on top in this particular comparison?
For starters, 5700 has dedicated music keys, which SE is too retarded to put on a phone. Secondly its Symbian. Thirdly its 2.2'' screen. Fourthly its QVGA video recording. |
kristianm Joined: Aug 12, 2005 Posts: 490 PM, WWW
|
And let's not forget, 16 million color screen for the Nokia. |
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
Exactly, so please, think twice before making such comparisons. |
kristianm Joined: Aug 12, 2005 Posts: 490 PM, WWW
|
"dedicated audio chip" for the Nokia 5700 . . . I don't know how that would improve the playback quality, but it sure does sound impressive.
Come on SE, you can do better than just releasing redesigned old phones. |
Dups! Joined: Sep 24, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: GMT +2 PM |
@QVGA- of all the 'advantages' you mentioned I find that the video recording is the only one that separates the two. Symbian at this level doesn't impress me. Oh, and kristianm, at times features that sound 'sound impressive' may not be in practice'.
[ This Message was edited by: EMS06 on 2007-03-30 12:40 ] |
MoeOz Joined: Mar 14, 2007 Posts: 48 From: Africa PM |
You should also consider one thing which is main for music devices BATTERY ! SE is da Best in this case u know .. Nokia 5700 the company promised 10 hours of playback But u know its juz on papers .. Its Symbain & ARM11 Processor so Less power[plus im not sure of the Flight Mode] .. with the SE w580 u Can Get @ least 20 Hours of playback music .. so its ur choice after all . |
roogenial Joined: Jan 25, 2006 Posts: 195 From: Chile PM |
I prefer the W580. Nokia is shit! |
c96sthl Joined: Mar 31, 2002 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2007-03-30 12:02:13, QVGA wrote:
Uhhh....that is the most retarded comparison i've ever seen.
Its suppose to be 5700vs W580/850 and nokia beats the living crap out of both of them.
P.S. Atleast compare music phone to music phone. Duh!
its also retarded to compare a smart phone with a non smart phone!!!
and did you read properly in nokia announcement?
5070 is consider a music phone.
what else can i use to compare ...all those Series 60 phone with Walkman?
don't you think that's not fair as well? of course nokia will beat the crap out of all those walkman...because you are comparing a Series 60 with a normal phone.
Yup in final I am wrong in comparing in this way.
It might make sense W200 with5070.
[ This Message was edited by: c96sthl on 2007-04-01 08:52 ] |
jepherberich Joined: Apr 25, 2006 Posts: 473 PM, WWW
|
c96sthl: actually it's more like a non-3G 5700 (5300? then again, it doesnt have a2dp) to the W580. atm the closest you can get to is W850 vs the 5700
i actually like the design of the 5700. W580 for everything else. does anyone know if the 5700 would also have fitness apps, like in the 5500 sport?
|
MoeOz Joined: Mar 14, 2007 Posts: 48 From: Africa PM |
Its a symbian OS afterall so not a big deal for a sport fitness software u know .. |
|