Esato

Forum > General discussions > Other manufacturers > Best Reception: Nokia, Motorola or Samsung?

Author Best Reception: Nokia, Motorola or Samsung?
amagab
P1
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 00:35
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Which phone manufacturer has the best reception in general, considering their current line of phones?

NOKIA, MOTOROLA, OR SAMSUNG?

My cell service: T-Mobile

Thanks!
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 00:39
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
At my END it's - Nokia . . . OLD Motorola fones were experiencin' signal-problems then . . . [addsig]
BobaFett
R520 copper
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-02-26 00:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Nokia wins imo but its up to the operatos too

This message was posted from a 6233
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 01:09
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2007-02-26 00:50:44, BobaFett wrote:
Nokia wins imo but its up to the operatos too

<br/><br/>

<i>This message was posted from a 6233</I>



@boba - Whatdayamean by: its up to the operatos too You mean they can MANUALLY calibrate their cell-site-transmitters favoring GOOD/better signals to . . . say: Samsung than those of Nokia and let's say? [addsig]
bart
Ericsson T68
Joined: Feb 03, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Flanders
PM, WWW
Posted: 2007-02-26 01:16
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
yes they can
With Ericsson and Nokia gone: we must keep their spirits alive and buy JOLLA or YOTA
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 01:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2007-02-26 01:16:21, bart wrote:
yes they can





@bart - Ooooohoooohhoooh . . . I never KNEW this one I guess thay should be FAIR and give BEST signals for all brand of fones . . . playing favorites is NOT really very NICE . . .
Dogmann
T39 black
Joined: Jan 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: London England
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 02:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@amagab

I'm guessing by the way you say Cell Service you are in the States whilst i am in the UK and also a T-Mobile customers.

On my Nokia N93 because i have the option i have selected UMTS (3G) only and have full bars of signal strength virtually every where i go. Whilst in the same area when i had a M600 it struggled to hold more than a couple of bars. Have never used a Samsung phone but when i had a Motorola V3 on Virgin which is a virtual Network that uses the T-Mobile Network that also had good signal reception nearly all the time also. But you location and your Networks cell sites in that area will always be the deciding factor so really i think there are to many variables for a definitive answer one way or the other IMO. Maybe not the answer you wanted but the only one that makes sense I'm afraid.

Marc
Blackberry Bold, V4.6.0.214, 8GB SDHC, Pin2553F455
Honoured to have Won Best Debater for the 2nd Year
amagab
P1
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 02:43
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I have noticed that I am not getting good reception on Motorola phones so it comes down to either Nokia or Samsung. The reason I'm doing this is because I'm getting an extra phone to use as a home phone and T-Mobile currently have some Nokia and Samsung phones for free.

Thanks!
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 03:25
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ama - So, Motorola is gettin' BAD receptions in abroad too? Why NOT get a ? [addsig]
amagab
P1
Joined: Oct 29, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 03:54
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
This phone is not gonna be used much so I don't want to spend money on it. Otherwise I would def get a SE.
*Jojo*
T68 grey
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 04:03
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@ama - So, were are settled with either a Nokia or a Samsung . . . what are the models to CHOOSE from mate [addsig]
Marly
Apple iPhone 6
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Netherlands
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 05:05
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Samsungs have the weakest reception of the major brands.
With my Motorola's I've always had a good signal, but I live in the Netherlands, a small country with an excellent network coverage.
"America: please don’t be a Dumpfkopf"
Matteus
K800 Black
Joined: Oct 20, 2002
Posts: 372
PM
Posted: 2007-02-26 07:10
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
I have tried during several years many types of cellphones. In my homeland the Nokia penetration was nearly 90% and nowadays maybe 70%. On average the most problematic reception (two way) is in Nokia-phones, then comes some cheap models of Motorola and Samsung. But the most models of Motorola and Samsung are quite good.

Nokia phones are quite horrible in cars, trains, ships and even in Stockholm, Sweden.

In the same place and with the same operator the Nokia 6310i and several newer types didn´t work at all ie. lost the operator, but a small Samsung clamcell, SE K800i, T39i, Z1010, T300 and K700i worked normally.
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi