| Author |
I just sent my K800i back |
ash213
Joined: Sep 09, 2005
Posts: 30
PM |
send it back to o2, got it on upgrade for £55, didnt think it was worth the money, alot of the features are same as the w800i which i had before. DOnt get me wrong the camera was great, but the weight was a major issue. Too TOoo heavy.
Now gonna try and get the d900 off o2 for free. As i want a thin phone, not too interested in walkman feature as have a 60gb ipod. |
|
|
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
...why u bought it?
|
scotsboyuk
Joined: Jun 02, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM, WWW
|
@ash123
Too heavy? It's a wee bit heavier than a K750 say, but I don't think the wieght is really a major issue is it? I certainly wouldn't return mine based on its wieght.
"I may be drunk my dear woman, but in the morning I will be sober, and you will still be ugly." WSC |
ash213
Joined: Sep 09, 2005
Posts: 30
PM |
i bought it in the first place becuase i liked the look of it.
i never seen it in the shops before i ordered, i know, sounds a little silly.
anyway sent it back, gotta phone up tomorow to sort out a deal for the d900 ! gonna have another battle, grrrrr. |
tranced
Joined: Jan 19, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Santo Domingo, wonDeRland
PM |
insatisfied ppl. what can we do?
|
Xugaa
Joined: Oct 05, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Great Britain
PM |
Heavy?! o_O
Bought it based on looks?! I mean looks are great, but once looking carefully at its spec sheets, it easily overturns the other (non-smartphone) SE phones...
|
slayerule
Joined: Apr 21, 2004
Posts: 170
PM |
stop posting this in two places, ive just read this on f365
hehe spasy paddy here |
apolloa
Joined: Jul 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK
PM |
It's 16 grams heavier then the K750I, not heavy at all.
The D900 is 22 grams lighter then the K800I but nearly a centimeter thinner!!!!! The D900 doesn't have 3G though. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Indeed, next to the cam k8 has nothing special to offer, i kept rather k610 and have the same features for the half price of a k8
This message was posted from a K610i |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
as is often the case bobafett you over simplify the comparison.
The K610 does not have radio, camera flash, it has smaller screen resolution, less memory and various other differences that together make up the difference in price between K800 and K610
_________________
Unless I'm very much mistaken...
reviews: i-mate V800 K700
[ This Message was edited by: masseur on 2006-08-30 22:48 ] |
apolloa
Joined: Jul 27, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Dorset, UK
PM |
I take it back, just read this about the Samsung ultimates:
http://www.t3.co.uk/news/247/[....]le_phone/samsungs_ultras_go_3g
Very Nice. |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
Contact, messaging, browser features and batt performance are the important points for me, so your list and mine one reflect the individual taste and usage and needs in a fone. Have to
This message was posted from a K610i |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
yeah, well, of course if you limit yourself to basic functionality then a K700 for much less again would also satisify your needs 
interesting though that the original poster doesn't think £55 is worth paying for a K800 but I guess competition out there is very strong these days, I too am tempted by one or two of the new thin samsungs
|
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@masseur i ment those are for me more important then the cam and high res screen for example. I focus on those since years, cos what i buy it as a fone to use, the list u wrote are the facts where mobile technology turned to in now a days.
This message was posted from a K610i |
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
I'm sorry, I was simply responding to your absolute statement of:-
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-30 23:25:53, BobaFett wrote:
Indeed, next to the cam k8 has nothing special to offer, i kept rather k610 and have the same features for the half price of a k8
|
|
and I disagree as, at the very least, K800 screen resolution makes a BIG difference over the K610 even for the basic functionality you describe that almost every current phone offers. Indeed the screen res of the K800 sets it apart from many of todays similar style phones and I don't think the K800 can be dismissed so easily
while the slim phones that the original poster is now after look good, I really wonder if he will be satisfied once he has those and I look forward to further feedback on this topic
|
|
|
Posted: 2006-08-30 19:50
jay0726 | 
