Author |
Sony Ericsson Tops Battery Life Test |
axxxr Joined: Mar 21, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Londinium PM, WWW
|
Norwegian Mobile site amobil did testing on battery life on some 45 different phones which took them 3 months,and needless to say the Z530i came out tops in terms of stand-by time and talk time.
Here you can read the Full Article and complete test results.
_________________
WHY CAN'T PEOPLE NOT SEE THE TRUTH?
[ This Message was edited by: axxxr on 2006-08-13 10:51 ] |
|
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
talk time umts means video call? i hardly doubt. imo it doesnt matter where i make normal calls, gsm or umts, i never noticed any differences.
|
mib1800 Joined: Mar 18, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
Did this people really do the test or just take the figure from the manufacturer spec sheet. Look more like the latter. And SE battery life given in spec sheet is pure nonsense. |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
there is sg wrong, i have to agree. but the article says actulla nothing about the reception qulity, what operator etc
|
shaliron Joined: Jan 15, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Melbourne, Australia PM |
@boba
UTMS call just mean voice call time, on UTMS reception (meaning higher battery drain).
@mib
It doesn't take the times off the spec sheet. It specifies the 'listed' talk time in grey.
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: WikipediaWinner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007. |
Arne Anka Joined: Nov 05, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-13 13:47:54, mib1800 wrote:
Did this people really do the test or just take the figure from the manufacturer spec sheet. Look more like the latter. And SE battery life given in spec sheet is pure nonsense.
|
|
You should really learn to read the full article (it is in english after all) before making that kind of statements.
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-13 13:54:44, BobaFett wrote:
there is sg wrong, i have to agree. but the article says actulla nothing about the reception qulity, what operator etc
|
|
It really does not matter that much for this kind of test as long as the operation condition (operator used, location etc.) is same for all phone tests.
But on page two the article says "The test was commenced in Bergen, Norway with SIM cards from Telenor Mobil".
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-08-13 14:28 ] |
mib1800 Joined: Mar 18, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
then this test does not reflect real world. My friend can get max 5 days with K750 on normal use. I can get a max of 4.5 days from my N70 on normal use.
The talk time as shown with with K750 more than double that N70 is just too far from reflective of real world usage. |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
@shaliron i use umts since almost 2 years and never realised that in umts system normal calls drained the batt faster. it really doesnt matter if i make a normal in gsm or umts system, only video calls drains the batt faster.
|
Arne Anka Joined: Nov 05, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-13 15:23:52, mib1800 wrote:
then this test does not reflect real world. My friend can get max 5 days with K750 on normal use. I can get a max of 4.5 days from my N70 on normal use.
|
|
It is as close as it can get and definitely closer and more accurate than your and your friends "test".
Even Nokia admits the test is good.
"Nokia's director of sales in the Scandinavian market, Andreas Lundin, tells Amobil.no that measurement of talk time is no exact science.
- The methods used by Amobil.no eliminate quite a bit of uncertainty, since all the phones have been kept in the same place, with sound being transmitted at all times. Still, there will be some natural variation, since you never can be certain that the phones use the same base station. Also, in a normal conversation, there would be a silence in each end 50 percent of the time.
Still, Lundin agrees that this is the closest you can get to measuring talk time in a precise way in a natural user environment. Nokia uses a European standard for measuring talk time, that depends on much more clinical circuimstances"
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-08-13 14:34 ] |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
they didnt wrote where they tested it. probably next to base station to get the best reception level
|
Arne Anka Joined: Nov 05, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Sweden PM |
It is mentioned the test was performed in their office. Now get their address and you can find out if it is located near a base station or not.
Still that does not matter as much as you make it sound as long as the the operation condition was same for all phones.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2006-08-13 15:12 ] |
Residentevil Joined: Feb 29, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Raccoon City, USA PM, WWW
|
This proofes SE rules, Nokia drools.
Tough times don't last, tough people do! Free Tibet |
xan K Joined: Jun 15, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Republica Dominicana PM |
LOL, poor Nookias.
|
|