| Author |
SE K800 - 3.2 MP vs Samsung D900 - 3 MP |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
I was criticized back there when somebody lamented that I am not aware what I was talkin' about when I said that the Samsung D900's 3 MP camera captures 'sharper' / 'better' images when compared with that of the K800's 3.2 MP . . . . though I don't have both these units yet, but having seen images taken with that of the K800's which I think has a little disparity when compared with that of the K750's (2 MP) . . . My final analysis was based with some comparison with those images posted taken with that of the Samsung's D600 and  K750 . . . your thoughts mates . . . I would appreciate it greatly if a fellow-member has some images to upload taken both with his/her Samsung D900 and K800 . . . to compare. Many thanks . . . I remain !
[addsig] |
|
|
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
There is little difference between the image quality beteen the D900 and K800 although i think the k800 is a touch better....image comparions between the K800/D900 and N73 can been seen HERE on GSM Arena.
[addsig] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Thanks - Axxxr for the link dude, 'will see that for myself . . .
[addsig] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Well, I've just seen the first SET - Outdoor . . . looks like the Nokia N73 OUTBEST the K800 and D900 . . .
[addsig] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
After seeing the 3-brand-comparison, I would say that the N73 comes in 1st, D900 - 2nd and the K800 - 3rd ! Though there is just a slight discernment between the D900 and K800 . . .
[addsig] |
axxxr
Joined: Mar 21, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Londinium
PM, WWW
|
I would have to agree the camera on the N73 is outstanding,shame about the poor design though.
[addsig] |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Yup ! If only they can change the HUE on the covers . . . it will look good . . . a little !
@axxxr - Many thanks for the LINK mate, I am now quite relieved how the comparison between the D900 and K800 was put into a TEST ! Though the Nokia N73 played the 'dark horse' in the 3 MP camfone arena 
[addsig] |
steele
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
Posts: 329
PM |
Based on those pics at the gsmarena, it's N73, K800i, then D900.
In my opinion, N73 pics are consistently good. K800i pics for the outdoors and building were good. D900 pics are consistently below par comparing to N73 and K800.
Do D900 and N73 have macromode?
_________________
http://ronniesy.multiply.com
[ This Message was edited by: steele on 2006-08-11 03:30 ] |
Miss UK
Joined: Jan 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
Jn what happened to the D900 pics that was taken by a member here at forum? If I mema rite they were brilliant really sharp focused. Oh I want that D900 lol my D600 is at its end
This message was posted from a WAP device |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@steele - Looks like we don't have a member here YET who have those models, though looking at the specs on the brochure will help . . . let's just wait more for some posts though . . .
@miss UK(elele) - Yup, in your thread .. . I guess it's - Celltech  But he has not posted since then 
[addsig] |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
sharper? N73? over K800? where?
as far as i can see... N73 bleeds its colors... look at the edges... i bet all those pix taken by those 3 phones were set to standard... or normal...
but then.. K800 offers more versatility in taking snaps... i guess its an advantage... ive held an N73 but not a D900... N73 is slow overall... i mean overall... tho not sluggish, just slow. yes it can capture better pix than K800, seldomly... when all luck falls in the right place... lighting and stuff like that.
but it missing a very vital aspect of photography, its the auto-focus... K800 has it... PLUS PLUS PLUS the macro mode. i think N73 has a tool for macro shots.. i really dunno what its called.. but its dull.. too dull to be compared to a K750.
but then again.. its all personal opinion...
thanks for readin.
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
admad
Joined: May 26, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Poland
PM |
Here is professional comparision, which show pure facts, and details. Now we can clearly see that k800i is just the best.
n73 vs n93 vs kg920 vs k800
[ This Message was edited by: admad on 2006-08-11 08:34 ] |
steele
Joined: Dec 27, 2003
Posts: 329
PM |
@admad
That's a good find. thanks for the link. now based on that, K800i is superior.
[addsig] |
shaliron
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
Well the D900, whether we'd admit it or not, has a mighty good camera for it's size. The phone's only 13.9mm thick, and for a phone that small to have such a decent camera should be commended.
I'd agree that the N73 did better than the K800 though. Hopefully the next Cybershot from SE has an even better camera and (if they get their sense right) a good quality Carl-Zeiss lense.
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: WikipediaWinner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007. |
dw
Joined: Mar 13, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM, WWW
|
I thought the n93 pics looked better in many of the shoots (not all though)
but I would still rather have the k800 since I don't like the rest of the nokia phone.. if only picture quality matters then ill choose a digitalcamera =) |
|
|
Posted: 2006-08-11 02:50
