| Author |
more colors |
T68 MMS
Joined: Jun 01, 2002
Posts: 162
From: Philippines
PM |
Do you think SE can make a new LCD which has more colors? |
|
|
orang3
Joined: Mar 28, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Never_never_Land
PM, WWW
|
i dont think so .. no point ...
Sex is like hacking. You get in, you get out, and you hope you didn't leave something behind that can be traced back to you |
wrecked_porsche
Joined: Jul 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: I'm not telling u !
PM, WWW
|
Why no point ?
This post was posted from a R520 |
Cophia
Joined: Jul 22, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney
PM |
The screen is too small to make a real difference, even the Nokia's with 4096 colours are not that great - to notice the difference you need a Sharp GX-10 or Panasonic GD-87 with 65,535 colours (and a 132x176 pixel screen on the Panasonic).
Also, power consumption will go up as the screen gets bigger and brighter.
|
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
I disagree. The difference is really noticeable between 256 colours and 4096 colours e.g. between T68 and 7210. |
NetGuy2
Joined: Jun 27, 2002
Posts: 260
From: Barcelona, Spain
PM, WWW
|
I'm totally agree with SuperG it's very noticeable the 4096 colors.
Moreover, the screen on Nokia 7210/6610 is a TFT Screen that brings more brightness and sharper images.
Netguy2 |
wapchimp
Joined: Jun 09, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Land of the chimps
PM, WWW
|
Yeh nokia cocor sceen is way better-shame bout the rest of the fone
This post was posted from a T68 |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
As I've written earlier.
The diff in viewing, on a 35x35mm screen is bigger if you upgrade from 256 to 4096 colors, than it is between 4096 and 65 000 colors.
And with the MMS rollout, why only 256 colors? Viewing a photo on 256 colors, who can say for sure what it's about? On a 4096 color screen you can! |
oxin_Rain
Joined: Jan 01, 2002
Posts: 72
From: MARS
PM |
i believe 4096 colors are much better than 256
|
Anietje25
Joined: Sep 27, 2002
Posts: 32
PM |
it is a BIG difference i like the 4069 better why dont they make a t69 dammit 
Im just a girl   |
Dj Boyi
Joined: Oct 05, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Liberty City
PM |
yeah,but after everyone has bought a t69 SE would probably release a t69i.......... |
maverickpl
Joined: Jul 18, 2002
Posts: 9
PM, WWW
|
I bought a t69 in Tijuana for 10 dol... oh nevermind. |
caff
Joined: Jun 14, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM |
wrond, 7210 and 6610 still use STN screen as T68i, and they are not as bright as T68i's screen |
jplacson
Joined: Apr 21, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Philippines
PM, WWW
|
Sony has a new screen technology... 206,000 colors... 320x480 res.
I doubt anyone else has similar technology. That's like an 18-bit or so screen. |
[MDS]
Joined: Oct 09, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: U.S.A.
PM, WWW
|
2 Caff:
Not true, the 7210 is a passive matrix TFT display... and it is much better than a 256 color, despite the fact that it is not bright enough. it has smaller pixels, thus looks more sophisticated and anyway you look at it it is still 20 times more color than the 68's screen. it is simply better... However, those Samsungs S100's are stn, therefore they are not as good as even t100, t100 seems much blrighter and better, so that 65k does not make up for its status, when gd87 (or wahtever the name is) will come out, that is where the best screen will be.
www.mythstudios.com |
|
|
Posted: 2002-10-18 16:30
