| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
jleosza
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 128
From: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
PM |
video bitrate 167 jumps on every 2 seconds on my w800 like edux said, but on the pc it looks great! |
|
|
jleosza
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 128
From: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
PM |
Oh it dosnt jump anymore!!!!!! i fixed it now it looks amazing... |
slasher
Joined: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 75
From: Philippines
PM |
- does the video encoding got better on this new version of hybrid?
- does it pixelate?
- when take a video, is there boxes showing and destroying the image of the video? |
obentou
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 364
From: Toronto
PM |
Camera driver is looking good. Keep it up... and yes, sharpness is still an issue. |
jleosza
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 128
From: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-07-02 18:47:35, slasher wrote:
- does the video encoding got better on this new version of hybrid?
- does it pixelate?
- when take a video, is there boxes showing and destroying the image of the video?
|
|
slasher video recording got a lot better, no pixels at all now the bitrate is 167kb/s, get version 1.52 its amazing! |
slasher
Joined: Jul 05, 2003
Posts: 75
From: Philippines
PM |
thnks frnd... ill get it now... |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
Ver. 1.52 shows 1.82 on my phone? is that alright? or was i dreamin?
.:: EDIT ::.
and boi! these drivers are really getting there... max_wedge!!! are you listening??? darn! tha driver is getting there! woohoooo!
a few more and we'll be eyeing on FAR to work with K800.. 
_________________
Just click the damn link!!! fireEGG™
[[ K750i | R1CA021 | EU_2 | 1GBms-PD ]]
[ This Message was edited by: rockygali on 2006-07-03 03:55 ] |
aksd
Joined: Nov 11, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: UK, India
PM, WWW
|
Version 2.1
http://rapidshare.de/files/24788095/camdriver0.dat.html
Shaprness adjusted to 5.......original R1CA is 4 see if you can notice any difference. If you cant then Maybe we've got to work a bit more on adjusting the sharpness. And the focuse algorith mis changed to original setting
[ This Message was edited by: aksd on 2006-07-03 03:57 ] |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
well its all but OK to me... shaprness is hardly noticeable. but sol gud to me...
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
Not much of a difference in sharpness (v2.1).
Still, i guess I can stick on to this version till you're free!
|
jleosza
Joined: Jun 15, 2006
Posts: 128
From: Belo Horizonte, Brazil
PM |
well it looks a lot better when the picture is shown in windows visualizer when the pics is shown at 800x600 but on the internet it shown at 1632x1224 there it shows a lot of noise more than the 1.52 version, i think you should take sharpness a little bit........ |
obentou
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 364
From: Toronto
PM |
I agree. I think noise is a problem (for me) since 1.5.
And one question, does the normal/fine picture quality distintinction work now? |
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
Noise, a problem since 1.5? And ever since I got v1.3, I have forgotten what "noise" meant.... 
No, i'm not kidding - just look at this pic I shot last night:
(Okay, slightly more-than-normal lighting conditions, but whatever...)
Not the slightest hint of noise - and the pic can put many a digicams to shame!
And yes, the Normal/Fine still works.
[ This Message was edited by: IRFCA_WDG-3A on 2006-07-03 19:12 ] |
obentou
Joined: Sep 19, 2005
Posts: 364
From: Toronto
PM |
Nice pic. But as long as there is sunlight in your picture (is there?! I don't know), the pictures won't suffer from noise. Try taking one at night with minimal lighting. Or perhaps I'm overdoing it with the tests.
|
IRFCA_WDG-3A
Joined: Nov 24, 2005
Posts: 359
From: Rajdhani Express!!
PM |
No sunlight, this one was taken at night. But it was inside a building, and the lighting was more than average.
OKAY, with minimal lighting, there is noise, but far lesser than the level of noise that we used to get with the R1BC/R1CA default drivers.
EDIT: Okay, decided to do a test right here, right now...
This picture below was taken in complete darkness with only the inbuilt LED-flash. (camera version 2.1) - it cant get any better than this - atleast for the time being!
[img=http://img280.imageshack.us/img280/3180/dsc047040mh.th.jpg]
[ This Message was edited by: IRFCA_WDG-3A on 2006-07-03 20:14 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2006-07-02 18:24
