Esato

Forum > General discussions > Non mobile discussion > ipods

Previous  12
Author ipods
jack77777
W810 white
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: uk/england.
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 21:26
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
cool i might et an ipod only probalem is i dont like the size even the nano is big for an mp3 player.
15% online - Sony Ericsson - "4 lyf"
kk.226
Aino Black
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 21:27
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
*in shock*
jack77777
W810 white
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: uk/england.
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 21:28
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
i might get an ipod only thing i dont like about them is there size i mean even the nano is big for an mp3 player.
15% online - Sony Ericsson - "4 lyf"
Luke-the-magic-man
P990 no flip
Joined: May 31, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
Posted: 2006-05-06 21:48
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
how can u say the nano is to big? its the thinnest mp3 player avalile I believe!
Check out my sales
I am a mac fanboy .
I will honor Laffens gift of P990 flip free avartar, but I sold the p990
kk.226
Aino Black
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 21:57
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Mate just get one of these: http://video.google.com/video[....]795654395654982399&q=ipod+flea

jack77777
W810 white
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: uk/england.
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 22:50
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
ipod vs k750i/w800i

i think the both are as good.
15% online - Sony Ericsson - "4 lyf"
kk.226
Aino Black
Joined: Nov 04, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London
PM
Posted: 2006-05-06 22:59
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Not soley for music. And they're not really compareable are they?
london-uk
Sony CMD MZ5
Joined: Oct 01, 2003
Posts: 214
From: Londres
PM
Posted: 2006-05-08 01:14
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
Quote:

On 2006-05-06 17:59:34, Debu wrote:

@london-uk: Actually, 64kbps AAC is pretty much better then a 128kbps MP3, After all the main reason for shifting from a layer 3 format to a layer 4 format is to get better quality even on a lower bitrate. Also, iTunes by defaut converts to 64kbps. TBH I don't notice a difference even between either. (Maybe my ears are messed up )




I can see your point. And btw apologies for my previous post, didn't mean it to come across as harshly as that
_________________
We are not afraid!

[ This Message was edited by: london-uk on 2006-05-08 00:16 ]
Debu
R600
Joined: Jan 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Colchester, UK
PM
Posted: 2006-05-08 02:42
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
@london-uk: No harm done.
Visit My Blog : Debu's Innovations

'When nine hundred years old you will be, look as good, you will not' - Yoda
kiwifly
T68 gold
Joined: Apr 30, 2006
Posts: 4
From: the front of a computer
PM
Posted: 2006-05-08 04:17
Reply with quoteEdit/Delete This PostPrint this post
actually, we have few song for big capacity, which is a kind of waste
Access the forum with a mobile phone via esato.mobi