| Author |
Too expensive! |
kjetil
Joined: Jan 22, 2002
Posts: 44
From: Larvik Norway
PM, WWW
|
Why pay 50% more for the T68..than what you have to pay for the t39? the specs are the same..not the display though. who needs a colour-display on their cellular anyway? I agree that T68 is a kick ass phone, but I would newer pay that amount of money..just for the background images-that's what it is all about -the colour-display.
________________
Trialsin'
________________ |
|
|
roman_m
Joined: Dec 31, 2001
Posts: 25
PM |
hah does t-39 have bluetoos haha and batery how long is it on t39 2 or 2 hours hahahahaa u suck |
Silver_se
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: 24
PM |
Yes, the T39 has Bluetooth! and it has long talk/standby time...
What it doesnt have is MMS support... |
MO
Joined: Nov 23, 2001
Posts: 114
From: Copenhagen, DK
PM, WWW
|
But what it HAS is an VERY BIG antenna  |
dmgpizen
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: 323
From:
PM |
Plus, the T39m drops in alot in Standby when Bluetooth is On. The T68 has a better Standby time...... 
Joen |
Jim
Joined: Jan 20, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Hi I have the T39m and I just love it
We have excellent phones so why are we making a discussion about which is the best ?
Bye
|
dmgpizen
Joined: Nov 30, 2001
Posts: 323
From:
PM |
For the fun of it |
Leecww
Joined: Jan 25, 2002
Posts: 8
From: UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2002-01-31 15:50, roman_m wrote:
hah does t-39 have bluetoos haha and batery how long is it on t39 2 or 2 hours hahahahaa u suck
|
|
The comment you made make you sound really stupid. I got both the T39 and T68. T39 does have Bluetooth but a weaker signal, but the stand by time is really good on the T39, cos it doesn't power a TFT colour LCD display. I still prefer the T68. |
laffen
Joined: Aug 07, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
Quote:
|
but the stand by time is really good on the T39, cos it doesn't power a TFT colour LCD display. I still prefer the T68.
|
|
Agree. I think my T39 has longer standby time than my T68. But the colour screen and MMS adds the *little* extra |
kjetil
Joined: Jan 22, 2002
Posts: 44
From: Larvik Norway
PM, WWW
|
I agree that it would be better without the antenna...ehh..but the antenna gives better signal.
roman_m...YOU suck!
________________
Trialsin'
________________ |
Cheys_007
Joined: Jan 26, 2002
Posts: 49
From: Manchester, UK
PM |
T68, for the simple reason that it just looks the biz.
|
arroyootje
Joined: Feb 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK-Belgium-Azerbaijan
PM |
No offence to anyone with a T39, but you can't compare it to a T68... That is just CLASS! There's no doubt about it that T68 is COMPLETELY worth the 50% extra money... |
mathmos23
Joined: Feb 01, 2002
Posts: 251
From: Greece
PM |
Why T68 is better than T39
1)Colour
2)Colour games
3)Faster Games
4)No Antenna
5)Better user-friendly menu
6)Higher battery capacity
7)Better support of Bluetooth
 Get Colour pictures with Communicam
9)Colour WAP
10)better calendar
11)Faster SMS typing
12)Better Design
13)Bigger screen
And lets not mention the new FW on MARCH!!!!
R2B
1)MMS
2)50 Colour backgrounds
3)Assign backgrounds to phonebook
4)Themes + Theme editor
5)Aimated GIFs as Screensaver
DO YOU WANT MORE GUYS?????????
([{MathmoS 23}]) |
kjetil
Joined: Jan 22, 2002
Posts: 44
From: Larvik Norway
PM, WWW
|
EEhrrmm!
Correction:
The T39m has
*Better Standby time
*Better signal (read: "antenna")
*The wery same Bluetooth support
*The same sms "speed"
*And the same calendar(on a tiny screen)
________________
Trialsin'
________________ |
Jpuiuajdbnfa341
Joined: Jan 27, 2002
Posts: 6
PM |
Why T68 is better than T39
1)Colour
2)Colour games
3)Faster Games
4)No Antenna
5)Better user-friendly menu
6)Higher battery capacity
7)Better support of Bluetooth
Get Colour pictures with Communicam
9)Colour WAP
10)better calendar
11)Faster SMS typing
12)Better Design
13)Bigger screen
...
14)Joystick |
|
|
Posted: 2002-01-31 15:42
