| Author |
Alternative Camera attachment for the T68 |
Dessybaby
Joined: Jan 03, 2002
Posts: 132
PM |
It nearly half the price of the SE version, do u reckon I should get this instead? |
|
|
hampe
Joined: Feb 23, 2002
Posts: 152
From: Sweden
PM |
I've read posts according to this subject before here at esato. And if I understood them right the picture-quality is quite bad, but I do'nt know.
This post was posted from a T68 |
denong
Joined: Oct 09, 2002
Posts: 127
PM |
If i wer u, i will defntly not... Orig mca-20 gvs btr resolution. So go 4 SE.
This post was posted from a T68i |
hampe
Joined: Feb 23, 2002
Posts: 152
From: Sweden
PM |
@denong. Thats not truth, the resultuion is exactly the same, and both cameras does got the exact same features. That doesn'nt mean that the picture quality is the same though.
This post was posted from a T68 |
ICE
Joined: Mar 20, 2002
Posts: 49
From: Norway-stavanger
PM |
Any one know where i can by the X68 ??
|
scottio200
Joined: May 29, 2002
Posts: 45
From: Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
PM |
Carphonewarehouse sell one for £70.00, its look identical to the MCA-20
dunno what the pic quality is like!!
-Scottio |
peanut
Joined: Mar 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK: Oxon and Leics
PM |
It is really bad, I got one the other day but thank God it is on 1 days return. I have never seen technology so embarrassing. It is not the camera only as I have also seen the MCA20 and that is not much better. MMS is never going to catch on as far as photo messaging is concerned and even 640x480 by emaill is rubbish. You HAVE to be in a really lit up area to get anything. I will NEVER use a camera on this phone. I would rather BT shots from my iPaq and send via email!
This post was posted from a WAP device |
|
|
Posted: 2002-10-09 12:10
This post was posted from a W995 
