| Author |
Yet another 2MP camera comparison test (N6280/N70/SE D750) |
kristianm
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Posts: 490
PM, WWW
|
http://www.gsmarena.com/2mp_test_6280_n70_d750-review-70.php |
|
|
$m@rtph0ne
Joined: Feb 28, 2006
Posts: 77
From: new york
PM |
lol, more food for debate. |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
Well Nokia beats  this time |
kristianm
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Posts: 490
PM, WWW
|
??? |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
Picture quality *is* better on Nokia ones, than on D750. Sorry |
kristianm
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Posts: 490
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
At first look, the one taken with Nokia 6280 seems sharper than the other two. If you are going to print your pictures without any editing, 6280 will [u]probably[/u] give you the best results. Taking a closer look, the three cameras deliver exactly the same resolution, the difference is the in-camera processing approach. The photos of Nokia 6280 are somewhat over sharpened, while the processing of the photos of N70 is a lot more conservative. Sony Ericsson D750 falls somewhere in between. The Sony Ericsson has a different white color balance than the two Nokia phones. You can also note that the photos from the tested Nokia N70 are slightly out of focus near the left edge.
. . .
In the following pictures, please pay special attention to the purple fringe between the tree branches and the sky. Nokia N70 manages chromatic aberration the best. Nokia 6280 scores the worst here, with its results being the least successful.
. . .
Photos taken in indoor light conditions have minor effect on our final evaluation. Colors in Nokia 6280's pictures are saturated (a bit too much, perhaps); edges are sharp. Both pictures made with Nokia 6280 and those taken with Sony Ericsson feature significant noise levels, which is a definite drawback. According to us, Nokia N70 manages poor indoor light conditions the best.
. . .
The following photo gallery hardly needs any comment. The two Nokia camera phones are just not suitable for close-up shots.
|
|
[ This Message was edited by: kristianm on 2006-03-03 10:09 ] |
shaliron
Joined: Jan 15, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Melbourne, Australia
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-03-03 11:03:36, Super G wrote:
Picture quality *is* better on Nokia ones, than on D750. Sorry
|
|
I beg to differ. The only area in which the Nokia is better is in low light. Just about every other scenario is the contrary to what you have said, especially the close up shots!
A wooden spoon is a spoon made from wood. Source: WikipediaWinner of: Best Thread (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Post (Huge SE Portfolio) 2007, Best Signature 2007, and 2nd Best Nickname 2007. |
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
Super G, please remove you´re "special" glasses...it seems now you even can´t read properly  Seems you´re read ability is like those nokia (in)ability to focus close objects
SE w880 + Iphone 4 16gb |
rockygali
Joined: Nov 21, 2005
Posts: > 500
From:
PM, WWW
|
2MP NOKIA fans just dont know when to give up... oh well... ho humm
"Darkness is the absence of light.. and not the opposite..." |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
@arez hehe
Super G is one of two guys who love nokia on this forum, and i hate that two guys |
datx
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
|
Psicological orgasm for nokia fans!!
A phone from their beloved company first bet a SE one (or seemed to) in a cam test.
Congratulations folks |
Super G
Joined: Mar 07, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: France
PM |
Go ahead sasha-SE, hate me. If that makes you feel better, be my guest. I dont give a flying duck about that.
The problem with you guys is you dont accept any other opinion than your "praise no matter what" slogan.
I simply dont like the D750 picture quality for all pictures are blurred. Not necessarily out of focus, but simply blurred.
Ok D750 makes good close-ups definitely.
|
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
I dont believe that those are the best pics taken!!!!
Iv done my own test with my K750 with r1L002 fw versus a N70..
The K750 had the best pics!
I dont have the pics anymore, but we'll do another test!! |
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
Most of them are poor pictures taken under poor conditions, but never the less, the D750 clearly takes the best pictures in every example.
The n70 pictures are way oversoftened loosing detail beyond repair, and the 6280 are oversharpened distorting the images beyond repair. Only D750 delivers pictures that are true to reality. And only D750 delivers pictures that can be optimised and worked with in a proper editingsoftware without being ruined, the others are allready ruined by the cams from the beginning, making any kind of optimisation or usability imposible.
Sorry to say so, but only amateurs in imagery cannot see the difference.
You dont let the camerasoftware try to compensate for the damage being done by a poor printer when printing directly from the phone, or compensate for how the pictures look on the phonescreen, by applying filters on the phone that actually ruins the raw material. Any proffesionel want the raw material to be as close to reality as possible with no filters applied, so you have the best possible material to work with in a proper editingenvironment if any optimisation is needed or wanted.
Its not about it being nokia or S//E (allthough nokia do suck when it comes to imagery), its about taking the most proffesionel approach when desiding how to solve the problem of taking a picture that is usable for anything other than contactpictures. Nokia allways trys to solve the problem from the point of view that these are only toys used for fun, and therefore allways try to apply filters they beleive makes the pictures look the best on the phonescreen or the best when printed directly to a printer from the phone.
I want material that can be worked with when transfered to the computer, I dont care how they initially look on the screen of the phone, cause 2mp pictures are not designed for the phonescreen, I care about getting the best raw material that gives the best possibility to be optimised as I want them to be, not as Nokia thinks I want them to be, cause they allways get it horribly wrong.
I could post many pictures taken with my k750 that are of a quality that no nokia can deliver.
[ This Message was edited by: numb on 2006-03-03 17:55 ] |
RTouris
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 112
From: Hellas
PM, WWW
|
Nicely said numb |
|
|
Posted: 2006-03-03 10:27
