| Author |
R520 antenna on a T39 ??? |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
T39's typically have not so good reception. Do you think it could be improved by pluggin in an R520 antenna (longer)?
It's \\ NOT /// !!! Look at it sideways ! |
|
|
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
might help a bit.... but bad reception on T39m is often not due to the antenna...
[ This Message was edited by: Cytech on 2002-09-26 10:34 ] |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
What's the cause of this bad reception?
It's \\ NOT /// !!! Look at it sideways ! |
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
it's due to a bad circuit... |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
My T39's signal strength indicator is one bar less when put side-by-side with an R520. Does this qualify my T39 as having a "bad circuit"?
It's \\ NOT /// !!! Look at it sideways ! |
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
might be that... most T39 (except those which already have been to service for bad reception) has this bad circuit... might just help with a resoldering of the circuit...
when is your T39 produced according to the productiondate on the label underneath the battery? |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
02W09
It's \\ NOT /// !!! Look at it sideways ! |
Cytech
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Stockholm, Sweden
PM |
ok.... I'm not 100% sure when all manufactured phones got the new circuit at the factory... at least all T39 manufactured before 01w50 is most likely to get reception problems... don't know how it is with phones manufactured between 01w50 and 02w14... |
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
Well, compared to T68i my T39 has somewhat better reception so that means its probably not broken...
Thanks again Cytech! |
|
|
Posted: 2002-09-26 11:30
