| Author |
K750i Picture Quality |
SE-MAN888
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Posts: 34
PM |
Sorry I didn't see any threads regarding this but... what's the difference between my K750i's 'FINE' picture quality and 'NORMAL' picture quality?? Which one is supposed to be better? Thanks alot..Happy New Year 2006! |
|
|
private_ryan
Joined: Nov 28, 2005
Posts: 86
PM |
'FINE' gives better quality than 'NORMAL' but its file size is a little bit bigger. So it utilizes more memory space. That's what I've observed. Happy New Year to you! |
victorm
Joined: Mar 27, 2005
Posts: 114
PM |
Two types of data compression, Normal and Fine, are at your disposal. The majority of the photos represented are in the Normal quality, and they look quite well. The photos differ in size almost two times depending on the resolution.A photo in the Normal mode takes about 300 KB when the Fine quality gives 500-600 KB.
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL THE ESATO MEMBERS!!! |
SE-MAN888
Joined: Aug 12, 2005
Posts: 34
PM |
Thanks alot!...now i know the differences... I guess i'll take my new year celebration with a FINE quality  HAPPY NEW YEAR YOU ALL !!! 
Don't drink and drive !! |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
I never use the Normal option, all my pictures are taken in Fine quality.
I dont see the point of it, especially if you're using a high capacity Duo stick.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
Twix
Joined: Oct 31, 2005
Posts: 95
From: London
PM |
I failed to see any difference between to the 2 picture qualities.
[ This Message was edited by: Twix on 2005-12-31 12:30 ] |
vrl29
Joined: Dec 25, 2004
Posts: 305
From: Philippines
PM |
i have also seen that feature from my previous phone (K700i). however, i can't seem to find it in my current phone (S700i). tried it before, and i didn't notice any major difference except the file size...
SE T68i (Feb2004-May2004)
SE T610 (Sep2004-Jun2005)
SE K700i (Jun2005-Sep2005)
SE S700i (Sep2005-Present) |
isherdholi
Joined: Nov 06, 2005
Posts: 55
PM |
Because the photo's taken in normal mode are much smaller in file size, this means it does not take as long to save them, and you should be able to take the next photo fairly quickly, whereas with the fine quality, you would have to probably wait slightly longer to be able to take the next photo.
Having said that, all my photos are taken in fine quality, and not being able to take the next photo quickly enough has never been an issue for me. I would recommend fine quality mode if you're not worried about taking too many photo's in a short burst of time. |
|
|
Posted: 2005-12-31 10:57
