| Author |
Need help deciding on what phone (K750i or W900i) |
Dan1984
Joined: Jan 08, 2003
Posts: 161
PM |
I'm looking into getting a new phone on contract.
I've narrowed it down to the two mentioned above.
I'd like to have a phone that can take decent photos and takes okay'ish' videos. not to bothered about the videos, but id like to be able to download certain things and watch them (eg Lost episodes...)
Size is kind of an issued because I don't really want a brick of a phone, which is what is currently swinging me to the K750i.
Is the W900i actually really big? and is it really that much of an upgrade over the K750i?
Thanks for your help. |
|
|
JK
Joined: Feb 24, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: S. Africa - JOZI
PM |
Search the forum, all the answer are here somewhere, Ill take a W900, its as big as the S700 which is a cm bigger i think! |
optiplex
Joined: Nov 23, 2005
Posts: 220
PM |
If the headset is free or if the price doesn’t matter to you, then w900 is better than K750. It has a bigger screen 2.2 inches vs 1.8 of K750. And has better video recoding resolution . So if you are planning to watch videos on phone and interested in video recoding then W900 is the way to go. |
Rekoil
Joined: Dec 03, 2005
Posts: 36
From: Sydney, Australia
PM |
its also a walkman phone  |
bakayo
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
Posts: 110
PM |
prioritize it like this... which is more important to you... features, or small size? I have owned both and I prefer the w900i by a good margin. The better video quality, camera quality and bigger screen are well worth it to me. |
marlonski
Joined: Oct 16, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-12-09 17:05:19, bakayo wrote:
prioritize it like this... which is more important to you... features, or small size? I have owned both and I prefer the w900i by a good margin. The better video quality, camera quality and bigger screen are well worth it to me.
|
|
W900 camera better ? Both 2mp. There seems to be a little difference in the pixels according to gsm arena 1632x1224 pixels on the K750 compared to the w900 which has 1632x1280 pixels. Does this really make a big enough difference to state that the w900 camera is better ?
|
jcpsad
Joined: Oct 15, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM, WWW
|
if you have the money W900i... otherwise get the K750i...
www.photos.panelo.com
www.panelo.com
www.bilog.panelo.com
www.pbalive.panelo.com |
bakayo
Joined: Oct 29, 2005
Posts: 110
PM |
marlonski, im not referring to number of pixels but rather noise levels and such. i owned the k750, and then got this w900i and every picture is noticably clearer/smoother to me, seems to be a firmware difference if anything. |
marlonski
Joined: Oct 16, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
@bakayo, that makes more sense, I couldn't see how the same cmos lens even with a vary slight variation in the amount of pixels (pic size)would really make any difference, on the other hand firmware could from what I have read. I don't have a noise problem with my w800 unless taking pictures in very low light situations which one would 'expect' to get unless using the  MX-60.
_________________
= 
SPURIOUS NONESENSE
[ This Message was edited by: marlonski on 2005-12-09 23:56 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-12-09 12:56
