| Author |
P800 photos are blurry like 7650!! |
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
http://www.pcwatch.ru/mobile/review/sonyericsson-p800pics2-e.shtml well i hope that this will be fixed because i want the P800 but the photo quility is the same as the 7650......also resolution and size is taken with 640x480.....so what now???see for yourself |
|
|
john74
Joined: Dec 21, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: GREECE/AUSTRALIA
PM, WWW
|
is it blurry around the edges or is it me??
|
captainsm
Joined: Jun 25, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Man, that suck ! It's as bad or worse than the 7650 !!
Guess my good old MCA-20 lives a while longer !  |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
John74 untill 1074, wooowww John U are realy so special,but I have to admit,U have to buy glasses,it is a bit bluuryyyy but not like 7650,and also what a stupid picture is the first one!!what understand a bout the photo |
manuela
Joined: Aug 18, 2002
Posts: 110
From: Austria
PM |
John74 untill all dear JOHNNSS 1074, wooowww John U are realy so special,but I have to admit,U have to buy glasses,it is a bit bluuryyyy but not like 7650,and also what a stupid picture is the first one!!what to understand a bout the photo |
Starter
Joined: Aug 12, 2002
Posts: 13
PM |
The photos put up by Eldar who claims to have taken it with a P800 do not look better than those from the Nokia 7650; certainly not as good as those seen from MCA-20... HOWEVER, Eldar conveniently refused to show any picture of the battery compartment which leads me to believe that his P800 could actually be a prototype unit not actual production model meant for retail... anyway, until someone actually gets a retail version of P800 there is still a possibilities the picture quality might be different from those shown on Eldar's review...
This is very common in digital cameras - the prerelease cameras picture quality can be not as good as the final release (check out sites like dpreview.com)...
|
tranquil
Joined: Dec 15, 2001
Posts: > 500
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
In my oppinion, if you want 1st class pictures buy a digital camera. A camera built in to a phone(!) will never be as good as a dedicated one. (Yes, yes, yes... I know I've commented on this before).
The way i'm going to be using the camera is quite simple, I don't carry a camera where ever I go, but I do carry my phone. So the P800 is really just a substitute for the real mc.coy.
|
ferrarista44
Joined: Jan 30, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: down south
PM |
@tranquil
yup i agree.
i wouldnt expect the cam to be as good as a stand-alone digicam.
it's as if you're expecting a t68's non-scientific calculator to do sines and cosines.  |
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
I'm not expecting it to be as good as a real digicam, but I was expecting it to be at least as good as the mca-20. But it's not.
At least not as good as the photos posted here, made by a mca-20. |
anas
Joined: May 29, 2002
Posts: 323
From: T68i To 7650 To P800
PM |
it is really non sense to put a camera in a phone unless its a high resolution camera, but maybe it wont be that bad.
Sony Ericsson P800 |
shklar1
Joined: Nov 27, 2001
Posts: 164
From: Israel
PM, WWW
|
Guys did you see this? http://www.mobile-review.com/review/sonyericsson-p800pics1-e.shtml
The pictures here are a bit better.... I think that the images that were taken in the link in the top of the page were not done in optimal conditions, and i think that they don't represent the true quality... |
kerberos
Joined: Jan 15, 2002
Posts: 51
PM |
here there is a compare with the MCA-20 and 7650 made by Aftobladet... its in swedish but you can compare the pictures..
http://www.aftonbladet.se/vss/it/story/0,2789,198728,00.html
[ This Message was edited by: kerberos on 2002-09-02 13:44 ] |
arroyootje
Joined: Feb 01, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: UK-Belgium-Azerbaijan
PM |
The quality of the MCA-20 and the P800 are exactly the same.....
It's not like the MCA-20 has brilliant picture quality......
It just depends if you move the camera a little while taking the pic....
|
Froddan
Joined: Jan 18, 2002
Posts: > 500
PM |
Based on the photos I've seen posted here, I'd say that the mca produces better pictures than P800.
To me it seems very strange that SE would have made a poorer quality camera on the P800, than the mca-20. |
|
|
Posted: 2002-08-30 01:18
