| Author |
Post your pictures (and video) taken with a K700 |
DEAGLE
Joined: Sep 15, 2004
Posts: 27
From: wales
PM |
Hi all. im new here!! good topic. im not sure if the quality of my close up pics are as good as the others on here but heres A Pic of the view from my bedroom 
[addsig] |
|
|
Screwston
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Posts: 196
From: Houston, Tx
PM |
sorry for posting this here but i just wanted 2 compare how good the k700's pics are 2 the n6600's. I'm just waitin for sumbody 2 buy it so i can get my sony!
R2L001-3.9>>>>R2AE003-3.10 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@screwston - Looks like the settings of your Nokia 6600 is in 'panoramic' view ? Does it have? Or just an extended or large image? |
djole89
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Posts: 428
PM |
And how is your image without that "www.esato.com" logo on corner? And how is it so big? Esato usually reduce to smaller resolution.... I don't get it.
This message was posted from a P900 |
joebmc
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Kent
PM |
maybe he hyperlinked it?
|
Sammy_boy
Joined: Mar 31, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Staffordshire, United Kingdom
PM, WWW
|
Unless it's not being uploaded using esato's image services, perhaps he used something like www.imageshack.us
"All it takes for evil to flourish is for good men to do nothing" - Edmund Burke
|
Screwston
Joined: Aug 19, 2003
Posts: 196
From: Houston, Tx
PM |
yeah i used imageshack 2 upload it. and yes its in panoramic mode.
R2L001-3.9>>>>R2AE003-3.10 |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@sammy_boy - We've got the correct guesses mate! Your link and my 'panoramic' view pic size taken by @screwston . . . , Maybe we can already apply at Kodak as technical advisers . . . |
mckvakk
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: 283
From: Oslo, Norway
PM |
 |
Burgaz
Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Cwmbranistan, S. Wales
PM, WWW
|
Proof that Clio's can't go around a roundabout at 70mph
Thought this pic of the clouds and sun came out good
Scooby 22B infront of me at the Optimax pump...
Messin about with panarama in work...
[ This Message was edited by: Burgaz on 2004-09-19 11:23 ] |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
two pics with my k700 the first one is on extended and fine quality the second is extended with normal quality can u guys even tell the difference?
 extended fine quality
 extended normal quality |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
is fine quality meant to be the highest quality? |
Burgaz
Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Cwmbranistan, S. Wales
PM, WWW
|
I guess so.... ?  |
deathstaruk2
Joined: Sep 12, 2004
Posts: 97
PM |
heres another 2 lol this time set in 640x480 mode.
 this one is normal mode
 this one is fine mode |
Burgaz
Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Cwmbranistan, S. Wales
PM, WWW
|
Well it would seem there is very little difference?  What's the difference in file size? If any?? |
|
|
Posted: 2004-09-15 21:28
