| Author |
Post your pictures (and video) taken with a K700 |
rrojas260
Joined: Dec 13, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Valencia, Venezuela
PM, WWW
|
Im seeing duble 
|
|
|
peeta
Joined: Apr 14, 2003
Posts: 147
From: Scotland
PM |
more pics please.
i'm liking this thread very much. its one of the amazing things about having cameras in phones is that we can all see what someone in chech republic sees every day. windows on another life kinda thing.
peeta |
blueday
Joined: May 23, 2004
Posts: 43
From: Berlin City
PM |
Very interesting thread!The pictures are great!
Want more more more.... |
Amras
Joined: Jun 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Bandung, Indonesia
PM, WWW
|
I'm kinda impressed of these beautiful photos taken by the K700. 
I think, I'll change my recent plan.... I'll have bought this phone by mid-August... hope so.
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
some maltesers (yummy)
some euros
and the usual view of my kids on their laptops on the floor as they watch tv and play GTA vice city (son) and zoo tycoon (daughter)
wish I could hold my hand a little stiller as they still have a little blur in them
|
gok2
Joined: Apr 26, 2004
Posts: 19
PM |
excellent photos!
I'm getting more and more excited every day to buy a K700!  )
Damn people, get it in my country as well!! 
|
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
you know when takin panoramic photos u take 2 separate pictures. how does the picture then end up perfectly aligned. is it the skill of the phone or the photographer?
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
masseur
Joined: Jan 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sydney, London
PM |
In fact you can take up to 3 pictures which are stitched together.
The quality of the stitch is dependant very much on the photographer providing sufficient overlap in the photos and also keeping the camera at the same angle so one picture is not at an angle to the next
not too hard to do as you can see
|
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
ahhh i see. cool, so the phone does most of the work for u!
Twista |
Millenniumcult
Joined: Oct 06, 2002
Posts: 66
From: Sweden
PM |
I don't know if my disapointment is unjust or not, but when taking pictures with the K700 under dim light conditions, not dark just not as much light as out in dayligth, the pictures gbecomes grainy and not good at all. Here is an example:
Does everyone els also get this bad quality when taking shots in dim light conditions? I must say that the ligt at that particular Kodak-moment wase no way near as bad as it would be in a night-club. And swirching on the photo light does not help.
P.S. Thos is one of the better shots from that evening have some that realy looks horrible.
[ This Message was edited by: Millenniumcult on 2004-06-20 17:30 ] |
Universal Exports
Joined: Mar 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM, WWW
|
Hmm, that's no good. I thnik that mine get's a bit grainy too. Not near that low quality though... Masseur's pics are better than mine in general...
Anyway, one I took today:
I was on my way outside
"The distance between insanity and genius is measured only by success."
-Eliot Carver |
TheRealSpawn
Joined: Jul 03, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Denmark
PM, WWW
|
#Millenniumcult
Dont feel dissapointed
All mobilecams are toys - nothing more - they are nothing but cheap webcams put into a phone. They cannot be compared to regular digicams. They all need "perfect" ligthing conditions just to deliver pictures that are halfdescent to look at. The purpose of cams in mobiles was to boost mms traffic - they were never ment to be a "real camera"
If you take pictures with your K700i under good lighting conditions - this means real daylight, preferably sunny - not indoor evening shots with artificial lighting, your pictures will be of the same quality as the rest youve seen here.
All mobilecams are terrible in poor lighting conditions - and even though the K700i cam is a step up compared to the T610 - its still only a low resolution mobile VGA cam, with a poor lense etc.
I cant say this clearly enough because it seems that there are so many people that buys their mobiles because of the camera, or expect way to much from them, and it allways makes me feel sad for them - if you want a good camera, get a real camera, if you want a good phone, get a good phone (you have) - dont ever expect the 2 to make up for eachother - cause they never will.
Mobile phone cams of today are toys, at its best they are fun toys, but they will never be as good as real digicams - yes, sure, in a year or 2 we will see mobile cams that can deliver pictures in the same quality as the cheapest digicams can today, but by then digicams will also have evolved and will still be way way better.
Yes the example you showed wasnt very good - but with the dim conditions I can see was present and the bright lamp on the wall right into the lense - every mobilecam would be just as bad.
What Im trying to say is - dont feel dissapointed - but preferably limit your picturemaking to sunny daytimes
[ This Message was edited by: TheRealSpawn on 2004-06-20 19:29 ] |
50Cent
Joined: Nov 08, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: ...whatever psycho!!!
PM |
i imagined the american theme tune when reading thru that. well said.
Trusted Trader: 50Cent (+6, -0)
|
Memzee
Joined: Feb 22, 2004
Posts: 399
From: London, UK.
PM, WWW
|
Photos look great on my screen... I haven't got a bluetooth dongle yet, so I can't show you any pics - I'm going to order one from eXpansys so expect to see some soon. Well as soon as it stops pissing down and I can take some sunny pics. |
Swedish_Chef
Joined: Jul 02, 2003
Posts: 338
PM |
Millenniumcult, you know that default setting is not high quality.. you must set it to "high"
Is that pic 640x480 high quality?
|
|
|
Posted: 2004-06-20 01:14
/ Nokia = 
