| Author |
Official SE C901 Cybershot discussion |
rambo47
Joined: Jul 03, 2005
Posts: 247
From: Denville, NJ.
PM |
I'm waiting for the C903. Slightly bigger screen, but the addition of built-in GPS it the real plus I'm looking for. That, and a NAM version. 
Blackberry Bold
Blackberry 8220
Blackberry 7105t |
|
|
korbindallis
Joined: Jun 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
so this is 4mm thinner then K850 okie so if its priced right ie say a little higher then what C902 is then it should sell well and i would buy it unless something with gps comes a long with same screen or a 2.4"
[addsig] |
King9
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Posts: 53
PM |
i think c901 will rock the boat bigtime. my only simple wish is a really solid casing. 2.2" screen is far enough for me, i rather have a smaller phone then a big brick in my pants. |
rphilippe
Joined: Jan 27, 2009
Posts: 49
From: London
PM |
I can't seem to find the C901 listed on the UK Sony Ericsson website either in press nor forthcoming products... The other two phones are.
Does this mean we won't be getting it?
or getting hopefully something different? With higher spec? In a CandyBar? |
jaguare
Joined: Feb 12, 2009
Posts: 12
PM |
Youtube-compatible,Pictbridge,Picasa webalbums,smileshutter,snapfish,Xenonflash... ooh my,c901 have some really new cool upgrades from c902.
Cant wait to get my hands on this beauty
Ps. I wish only  SE removed smart contrast, it suxs
[ This Message was edited by: jaguare on 2009-02-14 10:09 ] |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
On 2009-02-11 17:56:42, xironghostx wrote:
On 2009-02-10 20:28:35, xironghostx wrote:
What CPU does this phone use?
Anyone know??
I am still wondering. Does anyone have the slightest clue? |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
First live photos!!!
On the next photo seems that C901 has a quite little lens (related to the other phones)... wich suggests that it could have a tiny sensor too... So I just hope that it's photos will be better than previous Cyber-Shot model's
 |
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
If I understanded well from google translation according to mobile-review's russian page at MWC's SonyEricsson stand wasn't exposed the C901... It's quite strange for me, because there is no product pagefor C901, just in few countries, and isn't listed at SonyEricsson's press release's page either... |
chaos7
Joined: Aug 10, 2007
Posts: 38
From: Berlin, Germany
PM |
More pics of the peach colour variant at the bottom of the page:
http://www.mobile01.com/newsdetail.php?id=7016
2 camera sample shots:
http://www.zoto.com/sudekinanako/albums/18845/
Photos look surprisingly good, especially compared to these 2 of C903, which are just awful:
http://www.zoto.com/sudekinanako/albums/18846/
[ This Message was edited by: chaos7 on 2009-02-17 04:27 ] |
glennfc27
Joined: Aug 29, 2008
Posts: 1
PM |
@ chaos7
Thanks for sharing the photos for the two handsets (C901 and C903). C901 performed well, and C903 seems to have purple fringing again, which is widely common to all SE's phones.
Buying C901 compromises alot, why don't they put basic features on two of these phones, it seems that for them front camera is a special feature for a particular phone must have and the other phone under the same product line doesn't have. Well, it's for us guys to decide which really suits us. |
Luci'sPower
Joined: Oct 29, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
This phone is really nice i'm going to buy one when it comes out
_________________
For those who believe no explanation is necessary, For those who don't none will suffice
[ This Message was edited by: Luci'sPower on 2009-02-17 08:12 ] |
mediar
Joined: May 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Varna, Bulgaria
PM, WWW
|
At first you said that this phone is "just another one", but now everyone likes it. I think that after the W995's and Idou's release, the opinions about SE have changet a lot.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
King9
Joined: Jan 12, 2009
Posts: 53
PM |
just because the lens is smaller it necessarily dosent mean the image sensor is weaker, there is several cellphones with quite small lenses who performs very good.
C901 seems to perform very good, wondering if Sonyericsson use same excellent image sensor as c902/w902 ?
just look at this Flash picture by c901, (shoot with redeye reduction), it have very good quality for such long distance. looks we have a new winner here 
hope it released now in Q2, would be a perfect spring present. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
on white background everything looks good...
|
puestadelsol
Joined: Mar 29, 2007
Posts: 310
PM |
On 2009-02-17 10:56:01, King9 wrote:
just because the lens is smaller it necessarily dosent mean the image sensor is weaker, there is several cellphones with quite small lenses who performs very good.
C901 seems to perform very good, wondering if Sonyericsson use same excellent image sensor as c902/w902 ?
Smaller lens could mean smaller sensor, and smaller sensor is definetly weaker than bigger sensor made with the same tachnology. C902/W902's sensor isn't excellent at all, and I think -because the photos are looking maybe better than C902/W902's, and the lens is smaller- that the sensor isn't that weak one known from C902/W902. |
|
|
Posted: 2009-02-12 23:28
