Author |
no 16M yet? its 2008! |
kenoby Joined: Dec 17, 2007 Posts: 407 From: 404 PM |
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
|
|
centur Joined: Jun 10, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Bulgaria PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-15 08:41:07, DarkKrypt wrote:
put that image on your phone now...
tell me what you see
lol
Yes, I see like 18 bit ?
Ok , try this pictures in phone:
65536:
262144:
16 M
I can't see different b/w 262144 and 16 M on phone, can you see ?
|
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily. |
kenoby Joined: Dec 17, 2007 Posts: 407 From: 404 PM |
On 2008-02-15 12:43:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily.
I envy you |
BobaFett Joined: Jan 06, 2004 Posts: > 500 From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund) PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-15 07:38:47, islandprd wrote:
I kinda agree that 16M is no biggie. I have N95 8 and I often amazed how poor the same photo looks on its screen compare to S500. Yet many people brush off S500 completely.
dont forget, that the n95 screen res is really crap, compared to other nokia devices
|
tai020381 Joined: Dec 07, 2004 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2008-02-15 12:43:22, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 10:13:49, kenoby wrote:
Here is the original followed by examples on the A1200, N95 8Gb and K850i:
A1200 and N95:
N95 and K850i:
well that proves how dull K850's screen is. i'm sorry if you cant point out the difference, maybe you have low standards with these things and probably have like a 21'' CRT TV at home too. Not I though, i can spot the difference pretty easily.
Kenoby please take pictures with ample light as the k850 has a light sensor in front and will adjust brightness automatically in different lighting situations. As for the picture I see, it will automatically dim its display programmed by the phone. |
kenoby Joined: Dec 17, 2007 Posts: 407 From: 404 PM |
@ tai, here are two more. The fact is it is hard to get a proper photo of the screen. However, this I upload for your request, you will see they are different:
|
thecell Joined: Aug 25, 2004 Posts: 107 From: Indonesia PM |
@bobafet
LOL, i just joking, my point is the colour between 16m and 262k is hard to see their difference.
Picture above show the difference between 16m, 262k, 65k, 4k, and yes, i can see difference between 16m and 262, but it really hard, i must get my eye closer and focus to monitor to notice it diffence.
Yeah, but display quality cant judged only by how much it can display colour, but LCD quality too, most of us ever see display comparison (for example www.mobile-review.com) , same colour, same display type, same resolution but difference result.
|
kenoby Joined: Dec 17, 2007 Posts: 407 From: 404 PM |
Exactly my words. It is quality that counts. |
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
Yep, that's what I've been saying all along as well. It's the same with megapixels - it's got nothing to do with that. Neither does colours have much to do with the quality of the display. K850 kicks arse in terms of display quality,.
|
C905 Joined: Jul 08, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Denmark PM |
On 2008-02-15 08:23:53, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 08:19:05, centur wrote:
On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.
Please donwload: ColorDepths and see colors with your eyes.
if no one can spot the incredibly evident difference between 16m and 65k in that pic, then please, your eyes arnt probably even worthy of high end screens.
yeah, and i guess you have high end screens from where you come from  |
naveensiva Joined: May 21, 2006 Posts: 441 From: (((INDIA))) PM, WWW
|
k850 is crystal clear....
thats wht it all matters at the end...
|
Mizzle Joined: Oct 06, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM, WWW
|
I'm still finding it hard to snoop up a Nokia phone that comes just close to this
|
QVGA Joined: May 23, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Pakistan PM, WWW
|
On 2008-02-15 16:27:19, k850 successor wrote:
On 2008-02-15 08:23:53, QVGA wrote:
On 2008-02-15 08:19:05, centur wrote:
On 2008-02-11 11:53:35, sesukaku wrote:
shame on SE, up until this date, they have not yet to release any phone with 16M colors. I do understand and i see their screen have been improved a lot since K750, but it is just a shame that they have not yet implement more colors on it. Nokia has been using 16M color screen since last year.
Please donwload: ColorDepths and see colors with your eyes.
if no one can spot the incredibly evident difference between 16m and 65k in that pic, then please, your eyes arnt probably even worthy of high end screens.
yeah, and i guess you have high end screens from where you come from
I'm sorry but WTF is that suppose to mean? Are you having a dig at my financial status? Rest assured i'm pretty sure its much better than yours.
|
C905 Joined: Jul 08, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Denmark PM |
@ QVGA
calm down, i was just joking  |
|