| Author |
N82 vs k850.......(some new good pics [800 x 600]) |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
its so funny to read all this b""llsh""t....how can it be, that I and many more people get awesome pictures with k850 ???
i started this thread for one thing....k850 vs N82 pictures.... stick on topic please.
_________________
I  K850,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
____________________________________
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-23 09:07 ] |
|
|
>500
Joined: Jan 24, 2006
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-23 09:08:54, Dextrr wrote:
K850 got pwn3d yet again in another review and there are still people that have to make threads like these trying to convince themselves or other that the K850 takes better pictures. Sad!
I think its sad we still see topics like this! One comparrison thread is enough! And half the comments arent even discussing the original topic  (the norm in v Nokia threads)
In the end, they are just PHONES! Nothing more, nothing less! You will live, even if your phone cam takes great/crap photos!
|
kenoby
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Posts: 407
From: 404
PM |
I have only one thing to say:
 |
se_dude
Joined: Nov 07, 2007
Posts: > 500
PM |
^^^u wanna say the 5310 takes better pics?  |
Merkie2
Joined: Nov 06, 2006
Posts: 109
PM |
I guess he's talking about the QuickShare label. |
xironghostx
Joined: Feb 06, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
.. And touchscreen |
rickster2kuk
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Southampton, UK
PM |
I like the images I have seen from the N82, the only thing I would say is as with the N95, Nokia's noise reduction seems a bit harsh and a lot of N95/82 photos up close have that "fake" look about them and lack some of the detail.
That said I think the colour reproduction on the 95/82 is better than the k850i. If there is one grip I sometimes have with the K850i is that on auto the colours appear slightly washed out.
I think on par the n82 and k850i's camera's are the same. You get better colour and less noise on the Nokia but get better detail on the K850i. |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-23
|
Merkie2
Joined: Nov 06, 2006
Posts: 109
PM |
Awful colors. |
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
awful ?????
its natural colors....its winter you know, what had you expect ???? trees with green leefs and flowers in red, blue and yellow colors all around ?????
if you want colors in this type of country, you have to wait to the summer, or ?????
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-01-23 23:06 ] |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
There are two ways...awful or natural colors...they’ re natural for me in this shot (as the sky’s color)...the world is beautiful because it’s varied...
|
davidsic
Joined: May 30, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Belgium
PM |
Watch this page : http://www.planete-nokia.com/[....]ndex.php?showtopic=50267&st=75
And here is the translation of the author's of recent photos comparative say (translated with google) :
I think the N82 produced some very good shots in fully automatic mode. The settings are virtually ineffective and make very little difference.
For the K850i just the opposite: in any auto photos are very medium, but as soon as you touch a little bit the settings, it makes miracles.
It would be very difficult to choose one of its mobile (for photo-quality).
Let's say that the N82 will be very effective in photos taken on the spot where one does not necessarily have the time to make adjustments.
Conversely, if we have a little bit of time before either the K850i is really very pleasant to use and photographic qualities of the user will be called upon (it is very pleasing to note that the adjustments made during the shooting have a real impact on the quality of picture). |
-PERFECT-
Joined: Dec 29, 2007
Posts: 461
PM |
Do you prefer like this? Two click on color’s balance in photodj in the phone...in 20 second...nice but not real...
By pperfectt, shot with K850i at 2008-01-23
|
mib1800
Joined: Mar 18, 2004
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-01-23 23:10:49, rickster2kuk wrote:
I think on par the n82 and k850i's camera's are the same. You get better colour and less noise on the Nokia but get better detail on the K850i.
Unfortunately (or fortunately  ) in the gsmarena review, it came to a conclusion that N82/N95 has marginally better detail than K850 (i.e 7 vs 6 points). But K850 lose quite a lot in the post-processing algorithm (i.e. 8 vs 5 in favor of N82/95). And this is what reviewer has to say about the K850 post-processing.
Sony Ericsson K850 also uses noise suppression routine, but it is less intelligent than the one of N95 and in certain places it simply eradicates the really fine details. You can see how much details are sometimes lost. The noise suppression algorithm also sometimes has a problem with the edge detection thus removing significant amount of detail in low contrast areas of the image.
So it is a fallacy that N82/95 that do over-processing and suppress details. In fact, K850 is the culprit that do over-processing to the points that details are lost. Most probably to try to hide the photo noise due to cheap sensor and lens but to no avail as photo noise is still abundant in K850 photos.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2008-01-24 01:45 ] |
soane28
Joined: Jun 12, 2006
Posts: 401
From: NZ
PM |
On 2008-01-24 02:44:56, mib1800 wrote:
On 2008-01-23 23:10:49, rickster2kuk wrote:
I think on par the n82 and k850i's camera's are the same. You get better colour and less noise on the Nokia but get better detail on the K850i.
Unfortunately (or fortunately ) in the gsmarena review, it came to a conclusion that N82/N95 has marginally better detail than K850 (i.e 7 vs 6 points). But K850 lose quite a lot in the post-processing algorithm (i.e. 8 vs 5 in favor of N82/95). And this is what reviewer has to say about the K850 post-processing.
Sony Ericsson K850 also uses noise suppression routine, but it is less intelligent than the one of N95 and in certain places it simply eradicates the really fine details. You can see how much details are sometimes lost. The noise suppression algorithm also sometimes has a problem with the edge detection thus removing significant amount of detail in low contrast areas of the image.
So it is a fallacy that N82/95 that do over-processing and suppress details. In fact, K850 is the culprit that do over-processing to the points that details are lost. Most probably to try to hide the photo noise due to cheap sensor and lens but to no avail as photo noise is still abundant in K850 photos.
[ This Message was edited by: mib1800 on 2008-01-24 01:45 ]
Well i just had a look at M-R review of the N82 in comparison to the K850 and gsmarenas above statements seem rather unjustified if i can just show you what i mean:
N82
K850
I have no idea wheter it was the photographers fault or not, but just certain parts of the picture seem to blur, while the rest of the photo is in focus and has good sharpness. Heres another example:
N82
K850
So which review do you go by? M-R sample shots show a rather different story to Gsmarena.
[ This Message was edited by: soane28 on 2008-01-24 05:25 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2008-01-23 10:06
