| Author |
Number1 2.9 series, k790/k800/k810 camdriver |
diawollo
Joined: Oct 15, 2007
Posts: 31
PM |
Number1 could you force flash in document mode? Im using this scene for taking pictures of docs and when flash fire its not powerfull as make paper bright. I need more Power for flash. I know your settings is for focusing in short distances and in about half metre flash is useless. Could you mod driver for taking photos of documents with flash? |
|
|
reywal
Joined: Oct 09, 2007
Posts: 99
PM |
There's really no end to this quest for perfection. Lots of camdrivers have been posted. some people like them, while others do not.
We should consider primarily the phone's capabilities. Pushing it to become more than what it is meant to be is just like trying to make a vessel out of a piece of metal.
There's really no account for one's taste. LOL!
Peace to all, Merry Christmas!
_________________
I knew it from the very start.....)
Destiny will bring me here........)@.@
----------------------------------/
[ This Message was edited by: reywal on 2007-12-24 00:37 ]
[ This Message was edited by: reywal on 2007-12-24 00:40 ] |
flatulence
Joined: Nov 01, 2007
Posts: 6
PM |
I am seeing quite a bit of noise in mid to low lighting situations - is this typical? |
zirkie101
Joined: Oct 08, 2007
Posts: 143
From: Cape Town, SA
PM |
Pic using #1 2.92 All settings = Auto
What's that purple mark? Ps. I always keep my cam squeaky clean so it can't be the protective lens.
_________________
K800@K810 R8BA024 - Peter's R8 for K800 v2 [HiFi] - Number 1 [2.92]
[ This Message was edited by: zirkie101 on 2007-12-24 05:55 ] |
whitehackker
Joined: Sep 01, 2007
Posts: 154
From: philippines
PM |
On 2007-12-24 06:54:24, zirkie101 wrote:
Pic using #1 2.92 All settings = Auto
What's that purple mark? Ps. I always keep my cam squeaky clean so it can't be the protective lens.
_________________
K800@K810 R8BA024 - Peter's R8 for K800 v2 [HiFi] - Number 1 [2.92]
[ This Message was edited by: zirkie101 on 2007-12-24 05:55 ]
i think it's just the bending of light from the sun... |
toboyone
Joined: Oct 20, 2007
Posts: 5
PM |
Hey guys, especially number1..
just wanna share some photos i took with number1's new driver.. I just tweaked a little of the settings e.g. the multi AF window tweak and some sharpness changes, and the results are amazing.. So this is a toast for your hard work number1..
and for those who are still not sure which driver is the best, undoubtedly is number1! i'm using 2.91 with some personal mods..
these are 2MP photos, as i believe there's more usable material in 2MP photos for my k810i.
Flower Picture
Orchard Road 2
Outside my window
I havent tried 2.92 yet, but i will do that soon. keep up the good work number1! |
pepi777
Joined: Dec 15, 2007
Posts: 3
From: Bulgaria
PM |
2.91 vs. 2.92
2.91, All auto
2.92, All auto
I think that the previous one (2.91) is better!And you? |
killerPK
Joined: Oct 11, 2007
Posts: 252
From: Lahore, Pakistan
PM |
When i used 2.92 in Landscape mode, the camera reset when I took a picture. I think the compression code needs to be changed. |
deadman4168
Joined: Jul 24, 2007
Posts: 64
PM |
On 2007-12-24 12:07:17, pepi777 wrote:
2.91 vs. 2.92
2.91, All auto
2.92, All auto
I think that the previous one (2.91) is better!And you?
why it seems to u that 2.91 is better nd @ KillerPk i dont have this prob in 2.92 |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
the colour/sharpness/picture quality is the same in all my 2.9 drivers you will never take 2 pics that are exactly the same anyway, theres no point comparing 2.9 with 2.91 or 2.92, i wrote what i changed. |
Vit
Joined: Nov 13, 2007
Posts: 279
From: Brazil
PM |
One suggestion for modding:
I agree that 08 for sharpness is beyond our needs, but what about something just above shapness 02? Perhaps 04-05 should improve our pictures' quality.
FOR INSTANCE, TAKE A LOOK AT KOP 2.7 PICTURE IN http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=152275&start=2610, FAIDZ85 COMPARISON, WITH 08 SHARPNESS.
AT THE WALL IT SEEMS TO HAVE MORE DETAILS THAN GENUS' AND NUMBER1' PICTURES. PERHAPS IF SHARPNESS IS TOO LOW PICTURES MAY LACK DETAIL.
ANOTHER THING IS THAT I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT'S ALL THAT FUSS ABOUT NUMBER1' LATEST CAMDRIVERS. HIS 2.7 WAS CLEARLY THE BEST IN TERMS OF COLOUR REPRODUCTION, BUT AFTER THAT ALL HIS WORK SEEMS TO ADD SOME BLUEISH ASPECT TO THE PICTURES. I WOULD NOT GO FOR HIS 2.9.
TO ME THE BEST CAMDRIVER WOULD BE A MIX OF N1 2.7 COLOUR REPRODUCTION + GENUS MANUAL FLASH ISO AND SUPERNIGHT MODES + SHARPNESS SOMEWHAT BETWEEN 4-5. |
kiya80
Joined: Oct 25, 2007
Posts: 2
PM |
Where to get the number 1 2.92 driver |
G-Izzat
Joined: Nov 15, 2006
Posts: 482
From: MY
PM |
On 2007-12-25 02:55:22, kiya80 wrote:
Where to get the number 1 2.92 driver
Go to the first page. |
a_amirfarzam
Joined: Dec 03, 2007
Posts: 62
PM |
@number1
thanks for your drivers , but in your 2.9x drivers best pic not work correctly.
i test all of tree (2.9final , 2.91 , 2.92 ) but in all best pic have bug !!! |
mpasanthosh
Joined: Aug 28, 2007
Posts: 36
PM |
@ Number1
Your cam driver is te best:-).
In all aspects....
I like the colour reproduction....
If you could fix te bug in best pic its te best.....
[ This Message was edited by: mpasanthosh on 2007-12-26 06:12 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2007-12-23 23:34
