| Author |
K800/790 vs N73: For the first time I'm considering a Nokia! |
jack77777
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: uk/england.
PM |
i HATE NOKIA"S the k800i will kill any nokia even n73 and n93.
i have k750i and i have had more fun and pleasure out of it than my n70 and d600
k800i!!!
15% online - Sony Ericsson - "4 lyf" |
|
|
jack77777
Joined: Apr 11, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: uk/england.
PM |
oh my god i got hold of n93 as a friend of mine (will not say his name) works as a nokia desighner , i visited his workplace and they were testing the n93 , the camera is very good but is only a bit better than my k750i.
k750i killed n70 , now k800i kills n73 and n93.
15% online - Sony Ericsson - "4 lyf" |
kalel
Joined: Jun 10, 2006
Posts: 11
From: Philippines
PM |
Hmm...the N93/N73 is very tempting....but I think its better to wait coz I doubt the release date of N93....I'm sure that K800/K790 will release it in due time... |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
N73 has a humungous screen, EDGE, 3D stereo speakers, CIF video recording and Symbian. Cant think of any reason to go for a K800 |
BobaFett
Joined: Jan 06, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Kamino (wish it would be Lund)
PM, WWW
|
@jack u cannot compare a symbian fone with k750 or k800. just to make a decision based on the cam is pointless.
|
datx
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 130
From: Portugal
PM, WWW
|
@QVGA maybe the price? I'm not that rich for god's sake! |
QVGA
Joined: May 23, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pakistan
PM, WWW
|
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-11 15:35:43, datx wrote:
@QVGA maybe the price? I'm not that rich for god's sake!
|
|
Yeah sure, that too  |
kalel
Joined: Jun 10, 2006
Posts: 11
From: Philippines
PM |
Let's see the final version of these fones first, then we can already decide... |
rickster2kuk
Joined: Jul 14, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Southampton, UK
PM |
I had a look at the photos from the N93 on mobile review and i wasn't very impressed for a 3.2 mpx camera with Carl Zeiss lens, imo there were poor, loads of grain and the image looked artifical. My k750's pictures are clearer, and i think the K800i's are much better, even without the optical zoom and Zeiss lens.
Seeing as Nokia are touting there new generation camera phones, i've not been impressed with the quality, but then i never have been overly impressed by any pictures from nokia's phones; even my k700 took better pics than my older Nokia 6230. |
hellogoodbye
Joined: Mar 18, 2006
Posts: 85
PM, WWW
|
rickster2kuk yes u r right mate Nokias camera phones are only on paper they only are 3.2 megapixels and they can't shoot like k800 because k800 has real 3.2 megapixel camera and nokia is too expansive and it can do nothing if u r rich u can buy it but it's awful SE is the best !!!!!!!!! |
mario2002
Joined: Feb 15, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Jeffrey's-Bay ,South Africa
PM, WWW
|
I guess if you are a Se fanatic nothing will ever beat a SE. This is how life is - on the other hand the N93 and sharp903 take pictures and videos better then any SE. But then again I ain't a SE fanatic althou I Like some of their models (P-series) I would'nt hesitate to swap a N80 for a P990 which in turn get swapped for a N93. That much about loyality to any particular cell manufacturer. All of them are making money out of me - especially Nokia. Greetings from SOUTH AFRICA. MARIO :-)
This message was posted from a Nokia |
gmiddleton
Joined: Jun 16, 2006
Posts: 1
PM |
shouldn't the k800 be compared to the nokia 6233 non smartphone 3g phones! |
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-11 15:07:30, BobaFett wrote:
u cannot compare a symbian fone with k750 or k800. just to make a decision based on the cam is pointless.
|
|
yes boba,u cannot.but se isnt offerening anything against nokia's s60,and nokia is now starting to flood the maket with s60 devices from high to mid end,and s40 is now reducing to low end phones.
So we have no option but compare se's high end offereing with nokia's high end offering (yes,there is p and m series but they arent mainstream as k or w).
There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true - Winston Churchill
We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us - Winston Churchill |
peacemf
Joined: Dec 10, 2004
Posts: 167
From: UK, but now in CZ :)
PM |
i hated the k750i, which is why i got the w800, it looked better.
The nokia n73 looks better, and takes video!! (unlike the SE k800, which takes some lower form of video!)
I really wanted a walkman version of the k800, but that doesnt look like its going to happen. I'll just wait to see what else sony comes out with this year...
So far my current replacement phones are:
Nokia n73
SE K800
|
upper
Joined: Apr 17, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: London UK
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-06-11 17:42:45, rickster2kuk wrote:
I had a look at the photos from the N93 on mobile review and i wasn't very impressed for a 3.2 mpx camera with Carl Zeiss lens, imo there were poor, loads of grain and the image looked artifical. My k750's pictures are clearer, and i think the K800i's are much better, even without the optical zoom and Zeiss lens.
Seeing as Nokia are touting there new generation camera phones, i've not been impressed with the quality, but then i never have been overly impressed by any pictures from nokia's phones; even my k700 took better pics than my older Nokia 6230.
|
|
I think thats very early to say that as the n93 is not in its final stages and neither is the software its self, give it a chance because if my nokia 6630 can take great pictures which is comparable to SE K750 then i'm sure the n93 will blow away the K750 espeacially when its got Carl Zeiss lens.
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: upper on 2006-06-25 08:18 ] |
|
|
Posted: 2006-05-18 21:42
