Author |
Post pictures taken with your Sony Ericsson Elm/Hazel |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Original
Original
Phone?? What phone?? |
|
rikken Joined: Feb 23, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Norway PM |
Nice, sharp and saturated pics Bono
How is the w995 performing compared to the Hazel ? |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
W995 is crap photos compared But I use w995 as my phone but Hazel for pics
Phone?? What phone?? |
hihihans Joined: Mar 15, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
@ Bono. You've got to put the bull by Hazel here.
|
cutte Joined: Jan 12, 2011 Posts: 3 PM |
Nice sharing........... |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
Oh you mean that every camera phone I have had I have taken a photo of The Bronze Bull at The Bull Ring shopping centre?? Well maybe not every phone but near enough.
Phone?? What phone?? |
hihihans Joined: Mar 15, 2009 Posts: > 500 From: Netherlands PM |
|
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
That photo is the entrance to Birmingham University about a mile from my house. Lots of gorgeous sexy students girls in there
Phone?? What phone?? |
rikken Joined: Feb 23, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Norway PM |
On 2011-01-12 10:42:00, Bonovox wrote:
Lots of gorgeous sexy students girls in there
What are U waiting for ? Pics please Keep èm comming  |
Bonovox Joined: Apr 13, 2008 Posts: > 500 PM |
I wish
Phone?? What phone?? |
zAlbee Joined: Nov 14, 2010 Posts: 33 From: North America PM, WWW
|
Original
At night, but with bright lighting (no flash)
Original
Really impressed with the Hazel. Only problem is the flash is worthless; I find I only get good pictures with it off.
Nokia 3360 (2002) - Moto V551 (2005) -  w580i white (2007) -  w760i red (2009) -  Hazel J20i black (2010) |
reeflotz Joined: Jun 15, 2010 Posts: > 500 From: Philippines PM |
agree, the yellowish flash ruins the picture very badly. The good thing is it can still be used as a flashlight, at least it's not completely worthless 
[ This Message was edited by: reeflotz on 2011-01-14 15:30 ] |
urednik Joined: Jan 09, 2011 Posts: 11 PM, WWW
|
Ok, now I got a sunny day to give it a shot with my problematic white balance. Obviously it seems a problem in the software - white balance is set way to cold. My settings were automatic, but it would get even worse if set to a sunny day. Please comment my conclusion after watching my photos below, before I go to SE service. Thanks
I am impressed how sharp photos can be made with such a small lense, it even might be usefull to sometimes
set the camera to 5Mpx (yes ...).
Original photo, clean lens, sunny day. The wb is totally off - to cold:
Original
Modified wb, added red and yellow, getting near to the natural colour balance:
Original
Another photo recorded with a wrong setting (cloudy) getting more near to a correct wb, though the red colour is a little to strong here:
Original
Original photo, clean lens, shadow on a sunny day. The wb is totally off - much to cold:
Original
Modified wb, still not enough, even after adding 20%of red colour and 12% of yellow the picture is colder as in reallity:
Original
[ This Message was edited by: urednik on 2011-01-14 23:54 ] |
reeflotz Joined: Jun 15, 2010 Posts: > 500 From: Philippines PM |
To be honest I don't see that much anything wrong with the white balance now after the pictures you posted, setting to auto white balance creates a cold picture this is normal and typical in most digital cameras and cameraphones. For me usually when the sun is shining strong (yellowish sunlight) I use daylight wb, when the skies are clear (white sunlight) or cloudy I use cloudy wb to get warmer pictures. There are also times using snow settings + correct white balance produces good results during daylight.
BTW have you tried updating your Elm's firmware? If you have the cable you can try the firmware update through SE update service, might solve your problem or if you are unsure just bring it to a SE service.
[ This Message was edited by: reeflotz on 2011-01-15 01:57 ] |
jms2367 Joined: Jun 13, 2003 Posts: 302 From: The Philippines PM |
@urednik
same here, I agree with Reeflotz, I don't see any problem with the WB in your photos. If I am not mistaken, you also posted in the SE discussion board regarding the WB alleged problem. I used to complain also regarding the low light pics taken by the Elm. Well, I learned to live with it since I couldn't expect much from a relatively low priced camera phone to perform like a real digital camera. If I needed to take good low light pics, it is much better to bring along a dedicated camera.
Funny but true, I agree with what Degraff said in the SE discussion board: "Buy a camera if you want to take perfect pictures. Geez. You're talking about a phone here."  |
|