| Author |
Post pictures taken with your C902 Cybershot Phone |
recl
Joined: Nov 25, 2007
Posts: 251
From: Romania
PM |
masada
can you post the pics fullsize? 
edit:ty 
[ This Message was edited by: recl on 2008-09-06 23:42 ] |
|
|
The Matador
Joined: May 08, 2006
Posts: 318
From: Sheffield
PM |
night shot
| The Matador (+19, -0) | |  | M600i | P910i | S700i | T610i | T68i |  | T39m | | Blackberry Bold | |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
BTW: My comment on the previous page was referring to ajkda's Ferrari Enzo photos.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
masada1971
Joined: Jun 05, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-06 22:53:30, recl wrote:
masada
can you post the pics fullsize?
edit:ty
[ This Message was edited by: recl on 2008-09-06 23:42 ]
sorry mate..i cannot.if you want to see them full size go to camera phone photos section,i ve upload them there too and click on them to see them in full size...
[ This Message was edited by: masada1971 on 2008-09-07 10:24 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-09-07 02:41:19, The Matador wrote:
night shot
One of the brightest night shots I've ever seen. It may be shot at night but to call it low light with those bright flood lights would be a bit of a stretch
Still a good shot though. |
ajkda
Joined: Sep 05, 2008
Posts: 11
PM |
@muhamad oli mayb those pics were take behind the glass and im shaking badly haha thats why they were that blur or maybe my c902 have a problem
any suggestions on how to solve this problem??? thanks
[ This Message was edited by: ajkda on 2008-09-07 10:28 ] |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
On 2008-09-07 11:25:43, ajkda wrote:
@muhamad oli mayb those pics were take behind the glass and im shaking badly haha thats why they were that blur or maybe my c902 have a problem
any suggestions on how to solve this problem??? thanks
I'm not too sure. Obviously being behind glass and stuff won't help it. I'm guessing that might affect the auto focus. Is your phone's firmware right up to date? Do you use the image stabiliser?
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
ajkda
Joined: Sep 05, 2008
Posts: 11
PM |
On 2008-09-07 11:50:00, Muhammad-Oli wrote:
On 2008-09-07 11:25:43, ajkda wrote:
@muhamad oli mayb those pics were take behind the glass and im shaking badly haha thats why they were that blur or maybe my c902 have a problem
any suggestions on how to solve this problem??? thanks
I'm not too sure. Obviously being behind glass and stuff won't help it. I'm guessing that might affect the auto focus. Is your phone's firmware right up to date? Do you use the image stabiliser?
hmm im using the latest one R3CA038 firmware
i dont use image stabiliser cos i tried it n not much of a difference really.
its a software stabiliser so it could even affect the image quality making it even worst =(
|
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
Yeah I was going to suggest you turn the stabiliser off if you had been using it. Hmm... Sorry, I'm all out of suggestions. You might just have to try really hard to keep your hands still!
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
adnansanni
Joined: Dec 07, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Bangladesh
PM |
@Muhammad-Oli:
Isn’t stabilizer good? I’m confused with stabilizer. What you prefer? I asked plank but he got disappear. |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
I find my shots are fine without it. It is a software stabiliser, so I'd assume it would be very unnecessary unless your hands were very shaky. If you can keep your hands still, I'd probably avoid it. It is mostly a gimmick I think.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
ajkda
Joined: Sep 05, 2008
Posts: 11
PM |
hmm just found tat only those nite photos i took or those with low light suffer more from those blurs eg. grainy pics,pixelated shots
in day time they look better though its not perfect but they definately look better with less "blurness" haha so i guess its just the light and because its a small cam
@muhamad oli look at those pics at a "zoomed out" view haha cos i seem to be unable to resize them
just found out tat 5megapixels doesnt mean u would be able to view them at full size
because there are discrepancies between megapixels and resolution
which means that its better to view them at smaller resolution sizes even though it says 5mp
found this from howstuffworks.com search for megapixels n u shud see it |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
Sorry but image staberlizers in phones are just pap. Using it on my K800i is just a waste of time. When using nightlandscape the view finder is worse very slow update and the slightest move it blurs. I bet its not even in the phone as nothing happens. I have steady hands anyway i have taken night shots holding my phone and they came out clear. |
Muhammad-Oli
Joined: Jun 13, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: The NZ of L
PM |
On 2008-09-07 13:59:00, Bonovox wrote:
Sorry but image staberlizers in phones are just pap.
Yeah I figured they probably were. I haven't even used my C902's stabiliser as there's no need, especially when its more likely to ruin my photo than aid it.
This message was posted in the mail
2008, 2009, 2010 Best Australasian Member. |
PzK
Joined: Jan 31, 2007
Posts: 35
PM, WWW
|
I actually notice a big difference using the image stabliser , without it i dont get many shots without a slight blur or movement. My hands arent the best for keeping perfectly still, so the stabliser is great. |
|
|
Posted: 2008-09-06 22:53
| M600i | P910i | S700i | T610i | T68i | 
| T39m | 
