| Author |
Sony Ericsson K750 discussion |
numnums
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 270
From: keeping it awesome
PM |
and it's a pre-order...
http://www.celluloco.com/products/customer/product.php?productid=490&cat=366&page=1 |
|
|
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
and its ridicoulously priced.
Do not preorder, wait till release, it will not cost that much when released.
|
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
Well Ive finally got the money to buy the k750 whether i preorder it from that site or not. 
I sold my k700 for £190  and the person let me use her T68i till i got my new phone. How nice... #
T68i really sucks.. and right now am missin my k700 too much... But when i get the k750 im just going to love it just that extra more ehh?? |
djole89
Joined: Jul 26, 2004
Posts: 428
PM |
I can sell my k700 for about €180-€200, and I have 200€ in cash, I think it will be enough.
[addsig] |
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
1 thing which i noticed about the pictures taken with the k750
It looks ok, although in this paticular picture and a few others, it hasnt got the right colours nor has it got enough sharpness.
Then when editing my own version with a simple auto colour and a sharpness i came out with this picture. Now the difference between these pictures are great which is not a good thing. Ive noticed the worser camera's have the biggest changes (obviously)
Now which one do you's think looks better, becasue i personly would prefere if my k750 took pictures like the bottom one.
[ This Message was edited by: $hé®îNghÀm3:16 on 2005-04-19 22:21 ] |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
@$hé®îNghÀm3:16
You may have not noticed that the shot you showed is taken through a window (possibly a bit colored one to protect agains sun) and it may be a bit of smog/fog in the air hence the lack of color and a feel of unsharpness. Your edited picture is good. But looks a bit unreal/unnatural.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-04-19 22:29 ] |
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-19 23:28:12, Arne Anka wrote:
@$hé®îNghÀm3:16
You may have not noticed that the shot you showed is taken through a window (possibly a bit colored one to protect agains sun) and it may be a bit of smog/fog in the air hence the lack of color and a feel of unsharpness. Your edited picture is good. But looks a bit unreal/unnatural.
[ This Message was edited by: Arne Anka on 2005-04-19 22:29 ]
|
|
I understand what you mean by the unrealism WHEN looking at it through the forums. If seeing the pictures in natural size you'll understand what i mean more.
Another thing...
Was this picture taken by a k750??
As it says on http://www.se-nse.com/forum/showthread.php?t=298 '
We have recieved some new pictures taken by the K750.
The quality, in keeping with previous pictures, appears very good.
More pictures below ... '
More pictures indicating that, that picture is apart of 1 of the 4 fabulous pictures taken by the phone.
If that is taken by the k750 all credit, not much i can really update there... (though i could  )
|
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
All you have to bare in mind is that the people who take these early specimen pictures rarely spend time to get the settings right.
When we share pictures on Esato, we tend to spend time taking the photo. Of all the pictures ive seen so far taken by the K750, they all look like they were just taken on the move - walking around shopping centres, in the street, and in dark rooms.
Nobody has taken any real proper photos yet, such as landscapes, picturesque places etc.
What we need is a proper review of the K750's camera by someone who knows how to use the Cybershot settings to get a good picture - or wait for the phone to be released and see pictures taken by lucky K750 owners. Then we'll see just how capable it is.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
$hé®îNghÀm3:16
Joined: Jul 09, 2004
Posts: 379
PM |
@ etaab
...or we could just edit the dodgey pictures
lol kidding, i agree with you 100%... we'll just have to wait and see!!
..and why should we have to keep editing our pictures...
(i just wanted to include my improved version of the picture above)
|
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-04-20 00:13:12, $hé®îNghÀm3:16 wrote:
I understand what you mean by the unrealism WHEN looking at it through the forums. If seeing the pictures in natural size you'll understand what i mean more.
|
|
Probably. That said, the original picture may very well be closer to the reality than your edited picture since as I said the picture is taken trough a window.
|
Aikonoklast
Joined: Feb 02, 2002
Posts: 363
PM |
If you shoot through glass the autofocus can become confused and focus on the glass instead making the building blurred |
numnums
Joined: Mar 05, 2004
Posts: 270
From: keeping it awesome
PM |
does the K750 use infrared to focus or 'image contrast'? |
Arne Anka
Joined: Nov 05, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden
PM |
I have not found any info on that. Not even the white paper mentiones what type of AF it actually uses.
|
rmcrys
Joined: Mar 25, 2004
Posts: 164
From: Norte, Portugal
PM |
I think it should be image contrast, simpler, cheaper and enough for the device.
In the future it´ll have the laser grid to focus
Powered by SonyEricsson K750i |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
@ $hé®îNghÀm3:16
I never edit my pictures i take, be it with my K700i or my dedicated digital cameras. I prefer to spend time taking them, rather than take a quick picture and spend ages later on editing them to make them better.
I understand what you mean about wanting to see proper pictures taken with the K750, but there currently is only the odd one or two IMO - so dont bother editing the poor ones.
For example, this picture was taken by my old 3mp Sony Cybershot, resized to VGA. The picture looks great because i spent time getting the settings right. The same applies to the K750 and S700i.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
|
|
Posted: 2005-04-19 17:49
