| Author |
Post pictures taken with Satio (idou) |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
Mikely: How do you want to take good shots if your shooting indoors and against the light? Go out and take some photos in dawn or in the end of the day. Make sure your not shooting against the light.
But yeah, the sensor/optics on Satio are quite poor. And even poorer are the camera features.
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here! |
|
|
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
Poor, in your opinion only. zide, your negativity towards the Satio becomes boring quickly. I recently went on a camping holiday and took over 150 pictures which are excellent quality. So dont try to force your opinions about the Satio's camera onto people when they're posting proof in this very thread of its quality.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
quality my ass. The Satio camera SUCKS BALLS, and the software, well that sucks even more. Just look at the 0 detailed grass. A green mush. But i guess it can't be explained blind or fanatic people. Maybe some pictures look good, but so did the K810 and K750. Nothing new only a bigger picture than the K810. i tell you 0 improvement. Same poor post processing. Vivaz takes better pictures so... (I own both). Final word: mediocre.
http://norbinw.blogspot.com |
SheiKah
Joined: Dec 14, 2009
Posts: 8
PM |
Uploaded with ImageShack.us
[ This Message was edited by: SheiKah on 2010-09-05 23:44 ] |
zide
Joined: Jul 20, 2009
Posts: 481
From: Portugal
PM |
Hum.
See my photos taken with the C902, Satio or E72 in here! |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
On 2010-09-06 00:41:55, norbi_nw wrote:
quality my ass. The Satio camera SUCKS BALLS, and the software, well that sucks even more. Just look at the 0 detailed grass. A green mush. But i guess it can't be explained blind or fanatic people. Maybe some pictures look good, but so did the K810 and K750. Nothing new only a bigger picture than the K810. i tell you 0 improvement. Same poor post processing. Vivaz takes better pictures so... (I own both). Final word: mediocre.
I guess the strengths of the Satio's camera can't be explained to blind or fanatic people who just have to hate the Satio because it doesn't happen to have the features they would like....
0 detailed grass?? From those camping pics of etaabs, the grass looks pretty good to me. It seems like you are comparing the Satio to a DSLR...
Grass is the hardest of any texture for a digital camera to get right.
yes, grass looks mushy, but you'll find that true of even expensive compact digital cameras.
|
HxH
Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: GMT+7
PM |
Outstanding performer within good light outdoor (it will be good at night if strong light enough) shot I'm pleased with it.
Low light condition even outdoor aren't good to satisfy me even resize picture still notice noise and grain easily.
Satio have very small aperture when compare to ELM and C901  shouldn't miss this.
I brought it with me last two months sea trip, less shot that disappointed me
About camera menu and features it adequate and user friendly
I never seen any mobile change their functional less than 3 sec oops!
[ This Message was edited by: HxH on 2010-09-06 09:23 ] SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
Guess u didnt own K810... EV change instantly.. Macro is on in 1 sec.
About the green mush, you blind people realise what did you say when nokia entered the 1.3-2 megapixel war? Against the K750.. ALL nokia pictures where like oil paintings (thats what i and all of you said), and since the K800 all SE are the same. Im not comparing it to a digital camera, but FFS add some improvement over the K810. It's the same as a C905 but bigger picture. And i have already showed sample crops of other phones vs. the C905 (grass and tree shots). I dont know where they are, but i did this long time ago, and you could clearly see how other phones (not all, 1-2) take way better pictures. But again, you cant argue with blind men. Im not saying its shit, im saying its mediocre. The pixon 12 has better detail. Samsung always has better detail. My hdd died out, i had some old shots with my w800 there, unmodified camera, and it blew the Satio away in some situations, and grass was nicely detailed. Just search for the crops i posted if you are interested.
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]hootout/shots/gsmarena_004.jpg
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]hootout/shots/gsmarena_010.jpg
http://www.gsmarena.com/showp[....]hootout/shots/gsmarena_037.jpg
SE are always grainy red-is washed out oil paintings...
[ This Message was edited by: norbi_nw on 2010-09-06 11:07 ] http://norbinw.blogspot.com |
HxH
Joined: Dec 26, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: GMT+7
PM |
Then buy K810 put your SUC(K)TIO on sell, all matter end
And we will enjoy posting pic for our SATIO.
SONY x Sexy x Sleek x Solid x Stunner x Stylish : Nozomi/Kagura with Love. |
Acelew
Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Posts: 62
From: Moscow
PM |
yeah,i love my Satio d most,it takes best pic for me.. |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
i WOULD sell my satio but who do you think i can fool here with it? In my country people buy Nokia and Samsung, and alot of people who want a smartphone are documented, and can see that Satio sucks. I wanted to trade it with someone for a X10 + some cash difference from me. No luck ofc.
It can take nice shots when there is alot of light and outside. Thats it. I really dont use it anymore only for calling. So make me an offer and i will sell it to you (if you like it so much be a collector, get 2).
Pity because it has the hardware potential.. It can be a monster phone... but it is = to shit if its unhacked.
Yet you are angry at me but you havent said anything about the sample crops.
I like watching how you guys post pictures, especially anouk. But in most cases it sucks monkeyballs even compared to the Elm (ask the modders).
http://norbinw.blogspot.com |
norberto877
Joined: Jan 17, 2008
Posts: 80
PM |
a couple more pictures
 |
max_wedge
Joined: Aug 29, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Australia
PM, WWW
|
@norbi_nw, there is something wrong with those crops. The satio images look resized, there are compression artifacts from jpg compression not found on an unresized pic. Also they are slightly larger, as if the pics were taken from further away then enlarged. It may just have something to do with the different focal lengths of the pixon and satio. (30 to 35mm)
In anycase, the Pixon 12 is a great camera phone, no doubt. But you should check the GSM Arena Pixon12/Satio comparison closer - the cameras came out as a tie overall. They were full of praise for both cameras. So if Satio is as good as Pixon, or Pixon as good as Satio so what? How does this make Satio a crap cameraphone??
btw, regarding complaints of the speed of the camera ui, which personally I don't find too bad, about the same as C905, this is what gsmarena have to say:
Both of the handsets perform admirably in this test. Even though they have 50 percent more information to process than their 8MP predecessors, they still manage to be faster. We find the results of the Satio particularly impressive as smartphones usually have much slower camera interfaces than feature phones. That and the fact that it manages to do better in the most frequently used shooting-with-preview scenario are enough for us to pronounce it the winner here.
You shouldn't also forget that the Satio comes with the ultra fast BestPic burst shooting mode, which takes up to 9 shots in a rapid succession in full resolution.
[ This Message was edited by: max_wedge on 2010-09-07 02:55 ] |
norbi_nw
Joined: Nov 27, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Romania, Timisoara
PM |
Again, im not saying its crap, its mediocre. Vivaz is better and Elm too. And non of those 2 where advertised as entertainment unlimited. Its the first and still only 12mpx camera from sony, and still they wont make it more better. It could easily blow everything away, i know that, but the crap software (the software is the huge crap here) makes it mediocre. Idiot SE developers arent interested in further tuning. They are really really dumb IMO. Should get a Nobel prize for dumbness. Never did SE improve their phones camera quality. I bet much more can be done with it, at least they should have made it full unlocked so we the customers take care of further modding. Samsung is always beating SE in details. omnia HD beat the C905 in details and the Pixon12 is beating Satio in details. Colors are ok in both phones, SE is always red-ish. Some shots where failed on GSMarena, but the phone is not a joke. Too bad it came with a crappy OS. Thats why i am mad, 1 phone has good OS (clearly im not working about the satio here) and one has good camera.. One can do this good and the other something else. I dont know why cant we get all in one phone.
So again you cant convince me that Satio is more then mediocre, because i owned ALOT of phones and i have saw the evolution of some high end phones. I am not blinded by SE nor by other manufacturers. Im just saying it can do more..
http://norbinw.blogspot.com |
Acelew
Joined: Aug 30, 2010
Posts: 62
From: Moscow
PM |
Original |
|
|
Posted: 2010-09-05 05:59
