| Author |
Hybrid Camera Driver for W800i/K750 |
ady_k4e
Joined: Jun 11, 2006
Posts: 70
PM |
thanks. |
|
|
HarvJH
Joined: Jan 30, 2006
Posts: 319
From: Essex, UK
PM |
Aksd have you got any new drivers coming out soon? |
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
about this v9.86 camdriver, what best setting (normal/fine, night mode off/on etc) u all used for taking picture & video recording ?? 
  800i R1BC002 |
K`
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
Posts: 34
PM |
i don't mean to be rude, but i really want 2.71 pic quality but 9.86 video recording, so i try to combine both of them become a new driver, 2.71 pic quality, 9.86 video recording, 9.86 shutter speed..and tried the vidrec+night mode setting..no crash..i'm using R1CA..
just want to share (renamed the driver to 5.3)
http://rapidshare.de/files/29559118/camdriver0.dat
thanks aksd & ady_k4e
[ This Message was edited by: K` on 2006-08-16 03:52 ] |
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
what i can say is the new camdriver 9.86 is good.....
shutter speed improve, actually this what i looking for.....
so need to test more n more .... so far really satisfy with it
800i R1BC002 |
chakme
Joined: Jul 22, 2006
Posts: 38
From: Brazil
PM |
@K`
Hi man !! I can't test this camdriver at this time... i'm kinda busy ... but what do you (the "creator" of this camdriver) think about it ?? Is that working really with a mix of the both driver's ?? 'cause if you did it, i think it will be the best one of all ...
Thanks for now ... |
K`
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
Posts: 34
PM |
@chakme :
after doing some comparison, i found that the pic quality of the driver (color, sharpness, contrast) same as 2.71, since i use the hex-es from 2.71, well, i'm not an expert, there might be some differences on noise,etc (that's why i put it on esato, so people can judge it  ), but so far, for me it's the same as 2.71 pic quality, and the 9.86 fast shutter speed still there, plus the video recording from 9.86
no problem
[ This Message was edited by: K` on 2006-08-16 04:57 ] |
chestervn
Joined: Aug 16, 2006
Posts: 25
PM |
Hi, Im very new here hi again ya
First of all, i wanna say sorry if my English is bad and my replies are not so polite, cause i'm Vietnamese
i've read through all pages of this topic and what i feel is that:
I DUN UNDERSTAND MUCH ABOUT THEM
All of you are expert, and you always talk about what you expert, ignoring the questions of new member - How to install, use, by far plug-in or.... That we don’t understand
i appreciate your contribution very much, and i need you guyz help me
i have W800 and I’m interested in these things, my firmware version is R1BC002 - china just update and i just know how to use Far for 2 days, dun know how to install Camdriver....
What the meaning of the algorithm and do i have to change some lines or values (such as ISO, Spot, contract, Auto Focus Range),or it's already changed with new version of cam Driver that i just need to overwrite the current on by using Far?- so that I just need new version and run …without any adjustment?
After install, the settings menu will change or not? Or we have to change in FS?
If you can, send me some screenshots to vietdu_anh0205@yahoo.com
And again,
|
thegunners
Joined: Feb 02, 2006
Posts: 17
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-16 05:55:25, K` wrote:
@chakme :
after doing some comparison, i found that the pic quality of the driver (color, sharpness, contrast) same as 2.71, since i use the hex-es from 2.71, well, i'm not an expert, there might be some differences on noise,etc (that's why i put it on esato, so people can judge it ), but so far, for me it's the same as 2.71 pic quality, and the 9.86 fast shutter speed still there, plus the video recording from 9.86
no problem
[ This Message was edited by: K` on 2006-08-16 04:57 ]
|
|
So your camdriver is a combination between 2.71 and 9.86 ? |
K`
Joined: Aug 08, 2006
Posts: 34
PM |
@thegunners :
ya, i guess you can say so... |
e_erzan
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-16 04:48:34, K` wrote:
i don't mean to be rude, but i really want 2.71 pic quality but 9.86 video recording, so i try to combine both of them become a new driver, 2.71 pic quality, 9.86 video recording, 9.86 shutter speed..and tried the vidrec+night mode setting..no crash..i'm using R1CA..
just want to share (renamed the driver to 5.3)
http://rapidshare.de/files/29559118/camdriver0.dat
thanks aksd & ady_k4e
[ This Message was edited by: K` on 2006-08-16 03:52 ]
|
|
|
2uk3y
Joined: Jul 12, 2006
Posts: 214
From: Visit Malaysia 2007
PM |
just tested this 2 new driver.......
9.86 by ady_k4e
5.3 by K'
u all see the different is it ??
800i R1BC002 |
e_erzan
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2006-08-16 04:48:34, K` wrote:
i don't mean to be rude, but i really want 2.71 pic quality but 9.86 video recording, so i try to combine both of them become a new driver, 2.71 pic quality, 9.86 video recording, 9.86 shutter speed..and tried the vidrec+night mode setting..no crash..i'm using R1CA..
just want to share (renamed the driver to 5.3)
http://rapidshare.de/files/29559118/camdriver0.dat
thanks aksd & ady_k4e
[ This Message was edited by: K` on 2006-08-16 03:52 ]
|
|
Let me try this one.... |
e_erzan
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM |
It seems better....nvm,im trying it now....hehe |
e_erzan
Joined: Aug 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Singapore,Tanglin
PM |
It seems alot sharper!Yeah!:D
 |
|
|
Posted: 2006-08-15 17:21
800i R1BC002
