| Author |
Post a picture (and video) taken with your K750i |
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@super - Nice room pal, was that taken in the normal mode or extended?
[addsig] |
|
|
Superluminova
Joined: Feb 24, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: ...Mummies Tummy!
PM |
couldn't say mate, i don't have the phone, i got the photos from M-R the freaky thing is that the uy who took those pictures has the same bedding sheets as me!!!!!
any back on topic!
OBEY GAINT |
Supa_Fly
Joined: Apr 16, 2002
Posts: > 500
From: Toronto, Ontario
PM, WWW
|
Well I'm impressed with the resolution of the pictures taken thus far, even though Esato does resize them.
That said Esato cannot damage the quality of the colors taken. Arez, the large photo you posted at the bottom of page 3 is odd; in that reds no longer pose a problem. However, greens dont quite come out that good; this seems to be an issue with most cmos cameras, not sure if its ccd/cmos in the K750.
Look at the grass, light greens seem to be ok, but darker greens have some kind of purplish hue, not quite a purple fringe affect, just looks like a dibble of purple was mixed in the the dark green. Other than that this phone is pretty serious with the color. looks like just one firmware update is all it takes to get it just right.
Gads the price drop of my wife's k700 is just hurting. |
manfran
Joined: Mar 23, 2003
Posts: 289
From: PHILIPPINES
PM |
@Superluminova, that watch shot is way too sharp for a phone cam, man! is that from a k750?!!! i hope you're not pulling our eggs....i mean legs. |
etaab
Joined: Jan 23, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: UK - South Yorkshire
PM |
I didnt know REO even owned a K750i.. or does he ? 
That watch picture, although good could have come from any camera since we cannot see the EXIF information.
I dont even think it was anything special, i think the K750i can produce much better than that even if it was taken by a K750i.
Check me out on Instagram ! search for etaab ! |
masterp
Joined: May 28, 2004
Posts: 250
From: nederland
PM |
another one from me hope it is better then the things i posted so far
:edit: another one 
_________________
proud owner of a  p910i , k750i , and a hbh-600 , gave my k700 to my little brother ( said he finally got a decent phone  )have a branded (t-mobile)t610 for sale
[ This Message was edited by: masterp on 2005-05-21 11:14 ] |
ares
Joined: Dec 11, 2003
Posts: > 500
From: Coimbra, Portugal
PM |
@etaab, the watch photo is FROM A K750!!! It was taken yesterday by a dutch guy (jesper from mr)...heīs been shooting like mad since he got the phone....itīs a great photo that shows the potential of k750īs cam
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
If that Slazenger watch image was taken from the K750i's - 2 MP cam, well I am just at AWE  here ! Going back to the issue of the cam's sharp resolution, I read in one of the threads here last year, that the human eye has an equivalent of 7 MP camera clarity. I asked this to my brother-in-law, whose family is in the film (negative) industry for decades now and told me that the human eye has an INFINITE resolution of image clarity, much far incomparable with the digicam's MP equivalent, how true 
[addsig] |
vivek_h
Joined: Apr 11, 2005
Posts: 152
From: Mumbai, India
PM |
Quote:
|
On 2005-05-21 15:43:23, JN wrote:
If that Slazenger watch image was taken from the K750i's - 2 MP cam, well I am just at AWE here ! Going back to the issue of the cam's sharp resolution, I read in one of the threads here last year, that the human eye has an equivalent of 7 MP camera clarity. I asked this to my brother-in-law, whose family is in the film (negative) industry for decades now and told me that the human eye has an INFINITE resolution of image clarity, much far incomparable with the digicam's MP equivalent, how true
|
|
if that 7mp thing u said was true, there wud be no point in making cameras higher than 7mp....cause our eye wudnt be able to see it properly.....  |
shyam335
Joined: May 25, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: 127.0.0.1
PM |
damn,those pics from k750 looks so good
There are a terrible lot of lies going around the world, and the worst of it is half of them are true - Winston Churchill
We shape our buildings; thereafter they shape us - Winston Churchill |
turt
Joined: Dec 31, 2004
Posts: 236
PM |
Well the point of having 7MP cameras is to zoom in the picture and have a decent quality for printing 
|
REO
Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: U.S.A.
PM |
iphone rocks... |
carkitter
Joined: Apr 29, 2005
Posts: > 500
From: Auckland, NZ
PM |
@masterp
Those two pics of the dog, one pic said 508Kb and the other was 561Kb. Does the 2 megapixel K750i really take photos that are over 1/2 a MB in size? Wouldn't this fill the memory in like, oh, 5 minutes or so? How long does it take to open the photo folders? Do you fall asleep waiting for the photos to transfer via Bluetooth?
If the photo files are that size, one has to wonder how long it will be before we see 2GB and 4GB memory stick duo?
[ This Message was edited by: carkitter on 2005-05-21 15:22 ] |
numb
Joined: Feb 07, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
If you take more than 128 photos in highest quality and resolution in less than 5 minuttes and only have the standard 64mb memorystick then yes it would be full.
If you need more space for more pictures then just buy larger memorysticks.
The size of each photo depends on how much jpg compression is used, 500kb for a 2mp shot is not that much, my normal digicam pictures in the same resolution is atleast 1500kb.
To keep quality you have to not compress it to much, the more compression used, the lower quality. If 500kb pr. photo seems like much then just select a lower qualitysetting or a lower resolution.
You cant have both high quality and extremely low filesize, thats a contridiction of terms.
|
*Jojo*
Joined: Oct 15, 2003
Posts: > 500
PM |
@reo - Nice controller mates! Transparent casing . . .
@vivek - You have a point pal.
[addsig] |
|
|
Posted: 2005-05-21 04:09
