| Author |
Excellent 5mp shooters: Elm versus C901 |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
that proves that once Elm get a modded driver,its bye-bye C901
Hmm, what makes you think so?
|
|
|
anouk82
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM |
the lens needs cleaning mate...but as i said Raider(god) vs original camdriver mission failed. |
anouk82
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM |
On 2010-06-07 22:12:19, Raiderski wrote:
that proves that once Elm get a modded driver,its bye-bye C901
Hmm, what makes you think so?
cause Raider, its not too big of a difference and Elm is on its first days without properly modded camdriver.time will tell... |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
But camera drivers can't change pixel quality which is what we should be looking at
Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010!  ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
anouk82
Joined: Apr 13, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: Athens,Greece
PM |
On 2010-06-07 22:28:22, mriley wrote:
But camera drivers can't change pixel quality which is what we should be looking at
ok so we must stop use modded camdrivers  pixel quality is one parameter out of....hundreds.For example changing sharpness parameter can destroy or embrace a photo.That is what we should be looking at... |
mriley
Joined: Oct 03, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: UK
PM |
No, obviously camera drivers are great, but if its not a super mode one then editing is just the same. super mode is amazingly useful
Pixel quality isn't a parameter its the quality of the camera. We should look at things like noise reduction from 100% crops instead of parameters like saturation/sharpness/brightness/contrast which can all be changed very easily afterwards. It depends on how you look at it, that's my view.
Unless you are looking at the original parameters the camera chooses without the idea of editing them, but why let the people in charge of the camera module in Elm/C901 decide what sharpness/saturation etc.. is the best when you can easily change it yourself? There is no 'better parameter' as some people like very saturated photos and others like very sharp photos, one isn't "better quality" than the other, the same can't be said for pixel quality and noise reduction, these control photo quality --> the real detail at full size...
We can just compare full size which is the most important and see which has the most potential considering editing too...
C901 tends to produce photos lacking in saturation and sharpness for my taste, Elm has strong contrast but strange colors in low light, all which can be changed.
I wouldn't be surprised if most people didn't agree 
[ This Message was edited by: mriley on 2010-06-08 15:08 ] Esato's Newbie of the year and Most Helpful Member 2010! ------------------- Life is just a ride, enjoy it while you can |
Bonovox
Joined: Apr 13, 2008
Posts: > 500
PM |
I do 
Phone?? What phone?? |
xclbr
Joined: May 18, 2010
Posts: 113
From: PH
PM |
IMO:
-Elm can match C901 (when it comes to taking pictures in daylight)
-But Elm can't beat C901 (Elm performs poorly in lowlight and lacks xenon flash, which C901 has) |
groovepeppy
Joined: Dec 05, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Parijs van Java, Indonesia
PM |
can't wait for someone to mod Elm's camdriver...
Black Sensation Z710e - Black Apollo 9360 |
Navar
Joined: May 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Jordan
PM |
C901 better in color much than elm.maybe elm in quilty but c901 cleary have much nice and warm color's
http://en.islamway.net/ |
wawawee
Joined: Nov 01, 2009
Posts: 326
PM |
why dont we try to post shots with both original camdriver to compare?
|
Navar
Joined: May 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Jordan
PM |
Yea wawe you are right.
http://en.islamway.net/ |
wawawee
Joined: Nov 01, 2009
Posts: 326
PM |
@navar
its wawawee..hehe
|
jake20
Joined: Jan 23, 2009
Posts: > 500
From: USA
PM |
its not even close in my opinion.. the XENON flash makes the C901 100x more valuable than Elm..
|
Navar
Joined: May 02, 2008
Posts: > 500
From: Jordan
PM |
@wawawee i know  but i was lazy to count how many w your name have
Edite: wawawee i think you are egyptian?
[ This Message was edited by: Navar on 2010-06-27 05:59 ] http://en.islamway.net/ |
|
|
Posted: 2010-06-07 22:12
