Author |
Catch Life in HD With Sony Ericsson Vivaz |
domipost Joined: Mar 18, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Leiden, Netherlands PM, WWW
|
Yeah, good idea! Make it cheaper than the manufacturing price! That would mean loads of profits!
|
|
Dups! Joined: Sep 24, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: GMT +2 PM |
It's not what you do or even how you do it but in what state of mind you do it: Dups! 2009 |
sunrise_ Joined: Jan 20, 2006 Posts: 325 PM |
New pics and more:
http://www.eprice.com.tw/mobile/talk/?prod_id=3495&tid=4340789
|
chaos7 Joined: Aug 10, 2007 Posts: 38 From: Berlin, Germany PM |
More pics and videos
here: http://www.mobile01.com/newsdetail.php?id=8822 and
here: http://www.sogi.com.tw/newfor[....]cle_list.aspx?Topic_id=6110810
[ This Message was edited by: chaos7 on 2010-01-27 21:25 ] |
mediar Joined: May 05, 2008 Posts: > 500 From: Varna, Bulgaria PM, WWW
|
This site is one of the buggiest and laggiest I've ever seen. It always crash my browser, without exception.
The best mobile phone brand died with Sony Ericsson's death. Shame on you Sony for killing it! And, of course, for ruining the Xperia brand... Mediar's Site |
motvikt Joined: Jun 03, 2009 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2010-01-27 18:23:09, domipost wrote:
Yeah, good idea! Make it cheaper than the manufacturing price! That would mean loads of profits!
"They should practically give the vivaz away (make it really cheap) to restore their credibility."
Was debating with myself whether or not to to write it that way instead of just writing "make it cheaper", but then I thought people will understand (even wrote make it cheap behind it)... Well guess not, on the internet you gotta make it simple...
Sorry if I confused you, I meant make it cheap like 5800 or something, maybe even cut the price so they make no profit on it in the beginning.
|
rss_ndrsn Joined: Aug 27, 2005 Posts: > 500 PM |
It's quite disappointing to know that Vivaz is only capable of recording 720p @ 24 fps. I hope the commercial version is able to record at 30 fps. |
JAGUY85 Joined: Oct 17, 2003 Posts: > 500 From: Jamaica PM |
I am loving the new photos and video. The Vivaz is really a nice addition. I just hope pricing is reasonable...come on !! Not much delays, good pricing...aggressive marketing!
My  History: T310.K700>K750>W810>K800>W850>K800>K810>P1>X10a>? S. B. R. Jr. |
Karun Joined: Nov 09, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: India PM, WWW
|
The vivaz is manufactured at a cost of around 200 euros hence a retail price of 300-350 euros is the minimum they'll be looking at. If they manage to price it around that then vivaz has the potential to be a winner.
|
Tsepz_GP Joined: Dec 27, 2006 Posts: > 500 From: Johannesburg, South Africa PM |
I am actualy getting more and more excited about the Vivaz when i read about it being cheaper than Satio as it is it looks like Satio maybe free on my contract but i think i want the all Black Vivaz its the ONE SE smartphone im looking forward to.
Phone: iPhone 15 Pro Max Black Ti 512GB Tablet: iPad Pro 11” 2020 Space Gray 256GB Watch: Series 3 Nike Edition Space Gray Droid: Huawei Mate 40 Pro 256GB |
se_dude Joined: Nov 07, 2007 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2010-01-27 23:56:42, motvikt wrote:
On 2010-01-27 18:23:09, domipost wrote:
Yeah, good idea! Make it cheaper than the manufacturing price! That would mean loads of profits!
"They should practically give the vivaz away (make it really cheap) to restore their credibility."
Was debating with myself whether or not to to write it that way instead of just writing "make it cheaper", but then I thought people will understand (even wrote make it cheap behind it)... Well guess not, on the internet you gotta make it simple...
Sorry if I confused you, I meant make it cheap like 5800 or something, maybe even cut the price so they make no profit on it in the beginning.
If they dont make any money on this, whats the point? O_O |
>500 Joined: Jan 24, 2006 Posts: > 500 PM |
On 2010-01-28 03:07:22, rss_ndrsn wrote:
It's quite disappointing to know that Vivaz is only capable of recording 720p @ 24 fps. I hope the commercial version is able to record at 30 fps.
looked ok on youtube though. we'll see what happens
|
domipost Joined: Mar 18, 2007 Posts: > 500 From: Leiden, Netherlands PM, WWW
|
On 2010-01-27 23:56:42, motvikt wrote:
On 2010-01-27 18:23:09, domipost wrote:
Yeah, good idea! Make it cheaper than the manufacturing price! That would mean loads of profits!
"They should practically give the vivaz away (make it really cheap) to restore their credibility."
Was debating with myself whether or not to to write it that way instead of just writing "make it cheaper", but then I thought people will understand (even wrote make it cheap behind it)... Well guess not, on the internet you gotta make it simple...
Sorry if I confused you, I meant make it cheap like 5800 or something, maybe even cut the price so they make no profit on it in the beginning.
I was actually referring to the fact that the price is pretty good with it's 400 at start of sales. It's one of the most powerfull phones and beats the crap out of X6 in every way, and that one is 500 now. If they make it much cheaper, they won't make any profit anymore, which is not really the way to go.
|
motvikt Joined: Jun 03, 2009 Posts: > 500 PM |
If they dont make any money on this, whats the point? O_O
To sell some phones create a buzz, restore the company name, etc etc. Its like GM (the motor company) selling volt with a loss in the beginning to restore credibility. Basic economy, get people to like the brand again.
Well whatever. All Im saying is that SE probably wont sell it very cheap anyway and people will buy other phones instead. A phone like this should be sold for 350 Euro, like the 5800. 5800 became popular because of its price (in my opinion it was a really shitty phone)
This phone needs to be a big success.
[ This Message was edited by: motvikt on 2010-01-28 11:55 ] |
gharknes1 Joined: Sep 28, 2004 Posts: 231 PM |
no zenon flash................24fps
why don't SE just make a perfect device that everyone will want and flood the market instead of going to market with many devices that have loads of shortcommings that nobody wants because there is basic stuff missing, the satio was almost there except for the omission of a few basic things that spoil it
they seem to think that I will buy a satio if I want to take pics then a c905 if I want music etc etc so i will have like 3 SE devices in my pocket to use depending on what I'm doing, this is quite simply flawed, I want one device that satifies all, isn't that what apple tried to do. What they need are 3 flagship devices based on the 3 operating systems, that have equal capabilities and no shortcomings, then people get to choose the OS they want rather than a mishmash of capabilities, it would also reduce development costs only having to support 3 models, and if they are good enough they will capture the market share they need. |
|