| Author |
K800 vs C902 pictures please |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
another ugly pic from K800, remember guys "it never will have the same details & lightness like from C902"
ok... bye bye thread
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-24 10:17 ] |
|
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-08-24 00:40:57, Raiderski wrote:
do you remember hot pixels (red, green, blue) on K800 pics when ISO is growing up? well, ISO500 picture from C902 don't have this pixels, can we open the champagne now? hold on, there is also chroma noise on both pics which is quite normal, level of this noise on both pictures seems to be identical. C902 is more sensitive on red/pink color (more noise) while K800 sensitivity seems to be identical on all colors
ok, at least C902 don't have hot pixels to ISO500, this is good improvement! everything else doesn't matter for now
The hot pixels didnt disappear
by magic, the c902 has much more powerful noise reduction sure theres no hot pixels but alot more detail has been lost id rather have the hot pixels. |
razec
Joined: Aug 20, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Pearl of the Orient Seas
PM |
@Raidersky:
Just a question to ask, how is K800 with a modded camdriver in terms of low light details? i hope the nasty N-R on original driver was at least minimized 
~19 years at Esato |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
razec
http://www.esato.com/board/viewtopic.php?topic=170579&start=1365
there is a post for you
|
plankgatan
Joined: May 20, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: Sweden fur alle
PM |
about details & lightness....
try this with your K800/K810 
edit. Raderski... sunset pictures is nothing hard for a cell phone to handle. its enough with light to get good quality even with a K700.
try instead some indoor pictures with some simple lamps who shines, then you really see if the camera handle low light good or bad.
(ps... dont get me wrong. i love k800/K810 picture quality, i just love C902 quality little more )
_________________
I  C902,  W810 &  T29
------------------------------------
http://www.flickr.com/photos/21179102@N07/
(t610, t630, k700, k750, k800, k810, k850)
[ This Message was edited by: plankgatan on 2008-08-24 12:58 ] |
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
On 2008-08-24 08:35:53, plankgatan wrote:
(ive been taken to many low light pics with k800/k810 to know the difference)
lol... Show just one low light pic with your k800/k810...
With original camdriver you can't make some good low light pic with k800/k810... Raiderski show how k800/k810 is good in low light(real low light)
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-08-24 15:13 ] |
yanyanyan881
Joined: Jul 16, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
C902 wins K800/K810 for sure. My k810 cant take better pics than C902 photos in forums. There's always a blur in every pics i took. Maybe its becoz of the dust under the lens. |
borg_
Joined: Feb 20, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Algarve - Portugal
PM |
Great macro @Plank 
Xperia ZL White + C905 Ice Silver +  MW600 + MBW-150 Executive + /// T39m  Ericsson Technology |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
do we have some kind of competition here? no, I'm not interested
I know a lot about sunset photography that's why I'm surprised that you called sunset pic as low-light which is not true, nevermind. indoor pic will be later, I hope to see this kind of pic from you too (full size of course)
dont get me wrong... i just love C902 quality little more
ok, as I wrote before I am not questioning quality of C902 pics but I don't like when somebody is questioning quality of K800 pics
|
milan91
Joined: Jun 04, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Europe
PM |
  http://www.ImageShack.us" />
And we have horse for race 
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/milanche91
Ericsson 628>3210>3310>3410>3510>siemens mc60>K750i>> 2x nokia 6630>>w810i>>K800i+2GB modded to max
[ This Message was edited by: milan91 on 2008-08-24 17:21 ] |
AbuBasim
Joined: Nov 04, 2005
Posts: > 500
PM |
On 2008-08-24 17:45:08, Raiderski wrote:
Great shot! Was the disk that dusty when you opened the cover?
|
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
as I promised earlier...
K750 LED on the floor
25W lightbulb od the desk
light from the fridge
25W lightbulb, room in reality is darker than this photo
milan91
let's ride!
AbuBasim
thx! it's dusty because it was decoration of my room's wall BTW. it is 1GB in 2.5" from my old Amiga
_________________
K800 R1KG001
raider.4shared.com
flickr.com/photos/raiderek
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-24 21:49 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
will we ever see any C902 full size pic in low-light and night conditions or we have to believe in this?
http://img.eprice.com.tw/img/news/7117/a47_original.jpg
how many times we saw comments like "C902 is better than K800 in low-light/night"? many times but we could never see any picture in full size. aren't pictures speak louder than words?
pathetic...
give us ISO400 or higher! give us exposure 1/8s or lower!
[ This Message was edited by: Raiderski on 2008-08-25 09:44 ] |
Vipera ammodytes
Joined: Sep 22, 2004
Posts: > 500
From: Serbia
PM |
raider that link dont work, so i uploaded photo to imageshack
[img=http://img246.imageshack.us/img246/9693/a47originalqy7.th.jpg]
_________________
[ This Message was edited by: Vipera ammodytes on 2008-08-25 10:57 ] |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
Vipera ok
anyone here to defend C902 low-light and night?
|
|
|
Posted: 2008-08-24 11:16
MW600 + MBW-150 Executive + /// T39m 
Ericsson Technology
http://www.ImageShack.us"
