| Author |
N1™ 3.05 SM, Camdriver for k790/k800/k810/k818 & N1™ 2.5 Final camdriver1 for /k800/k810. |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
number1 if you ve could remove that damn 906kb limit from main you would be a SE super hero.And by the way it would be nice to hace 1mb+ pics,and the other thing would be that camdrivers wouldn t crash anymore.Am i right?
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-05-14 16:37 ] |
|
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
On 2008-05-14 17:36:57, kmzoltan wrote:
number1 if you ve could remove that damn 906kb limit from main you would be a SE super hero.And by the way it would be nice to hace 1mb+ pics,and the other thing would be that camdrivers wouldn t crash anymore.Am i right?
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-05-14 16:37 ]
the limit is not in the driver, it's the main firmware or cam module yes if it was removed we could enjoy 1mb+ pics with no crashing. |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
could you take a look at this image please i think this is the part when the camera can t allocate more buffer size.http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm173/kmzoltan/?action=view¤t=cam.jpg
please answer and tell me your opinion.
,,Could not allocate more than % bytes(software modification required),, what s that all about?
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-05-14 17:30 ] |
jomateixa
Joined: Dec 09, 2007
Posts: > 500
From:
PM |
On 2008-05-14 18:28:44, kmzoltan wrote:
could you take a look at this image please i think this is the part when the camera can t allocate more buffer size.http://s296.photobucket.com/albums/mm173/kmzoltan/?action=view¤t=cam.jpg
please answer and tell me your opinion.
,,Could not allocate more than % bytes(software modification required),, what s that all about?
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-05-14 17:30 ]
That are only text messages, not the part in firmware where do you change the buffer size. Anyway K800 has a f**kin' CMOS sensor and in the case we'll be able to increase size we couldn't see he difference., cause JPEG Q=90 is already good.
[ This Message was edited by: jomateixa on 2008-05-14 18:06 ] |
kmzoltan
Joined: Apr 02, 2007
Posts: 58
PM |
what about Raiderski can someone contact him?Because he was the first who find this in the main,and i think that he could modify it.
Jomateixa an Number1 i have a another question:How did you two managed to learn hex and edit camdrivers?What tools do you use?If u don t want to talk in the forum then PM me.THnks
[ This Message was edited by: kmzoltan on 2008-05-14 18:47 ] |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
it hasn't been found in the main, and it's possible it could be limited by the actual cam module itself not the firmware.
you don't even have to learn hex windows calculator converts decimal to hex and the driver opens in notepad. |
eddie2020
Joined: Apr 28, 2008
Posts: 331
PM |
lolx... this will b crazy with 1mb ++ photo |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
kmzoltan your idea is good but as Joma wrote: "those are text labels only". however if we know address of text then we can find code from where this text is called. this point in code is very near memory allocation code. unfortunately you have to know a lot about ARM code, reverse engineering, disassembling code in IDA, bla bla... etc. pity...
i was doing things like that only for Motorola 68k so i'm quit. if someone who knows ARM will pull up this issue then 1+MB photo will be realized (of course if hardware memory is more than 1MB)
is this worth? in my personal opinion, more than 1MB photo will not increase quality. "a bit better" is not worth it
cheers
|
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
is this worth? in my personal opinion, more than 1MB photo will not increase quality. "a bit better" is not worth it
cheers
A bit better is better than nothing. |
sadeghi85
Joined: Oct 13, 2007
Posts: 341
PM |
On 2008-05-14 22:42:19, number1 wrote:
A bit better is better than nothing.
Better? really you think 1mb+ pic will be better in quality? |
number1
Joined: Sep 12, 2007
Posts: > 500
From: UK,kent,Sittingbourne
PM |
a little bit yes, not as much data will be lost in compressing it. |
Raiderski
Joined: Jul 03, 2006
Posts: > 500
From: Poland, Hell, Mountains
PM, WWW
|
the best solution is to have possibility to enable 1+MB size and then see what we can expect to clarify results and satisfy some users  some people like to have big files, others not - everything for everyone
|
jrocks0829
Joined: Mar 05, 2008
Posts: 35
From: Davao City, Philippines
PM, WWW
|
i think it would be more nice to have 1mb+ pics since as what i've observed on some other digital cameras they have 1mb+ size per pic thus resulting to a good picture quality.. and also i saw some cameras that generates 900+kb somehow have less quality.
My Blog @ [[http://www.josephsator.info]]
Photos shot with S.E. k800i Number 1, 3.0 Shootersmode-> http://www.flickr.com/photos/josephrocks |
mirrage24
Joined: May 07, 2008
Posts: 101
From: Philippines
PM |
sum samples with 3.0....
Landscape scene + Mode 1+ WB:cloudy
portrait scene + Mode 1 + WB: cloudy
nightprotrait scene + Mode 2 + WB: auto
|
stat5bot
Joined: Jan 16, 2008
Posts: 67
PM |
On 2008-05-13 02:24:26, stat5bot wrote:
i reformatted my computer..
now i lost the installation for XS++ again.
anybody could a share a download link so that i could try this driver? thanks a lot!
up... |
|
|
Posted: 2008-05-14 17:36
